Gujarat Court January 1987 Judgments
State of Gujarat Vs. Babu Allas Roni Manilal
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jan-21-1987
Reported in: (1987)1GLR590
D.H. Shukla, J.1. The Appellant, State of Gujarat, is aggrieved by the acquittal judgment of the respondent-accused, Babu @ Roni Manilal, rendered by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bhavnagar, in Sessions Case No. 102 of 1984, acquitting the respondent-accused of the charges under Sections 363, 366 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code.2. The facts, shortly stated, are that the prosecutrix, Bai Minakshi, daughter of Maganlal Bhikhabhai of village Rajpara, had gone on 9-7-1984 at about 4-00 p.m. to the dispensary of Dr. Patel for being treated for fever, diarrhoea and vomit. She was accompanied by her sister, Jyotsna. However, Jyotsna returned alone and told her mother Parvatiben that Minakshiben, the prosecutrix was admitted in the hospital and she had asked her to convey that her father should go to look after her health the next day. Therefore, Parvatiben on the next day went to Dr. Patel's dispensary at Talaja to inquire after Minakshiben, but Dr. Patel told her that he had admini...
Tag this Judgment!Manharlal I. Shah Vs. Yogeshkumar Kanaiyalal Saraia and ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jan-21-1987
Reported in: (1987)1GLR608
G.T. Nanavati, J.1. This petition is filed by the original informant whose sister Anita died in suspicious circumstances on 14-9-1985. She was married to Yogeshkumar, respondent No. 1 about four months before the date of her death. She died at her husband's place and the information which was conveyed to the relatives of Anita and others was that she had committed suicide by hanging. No post mortem examination was allowed to be performed. The petitioner's case is that no proper action was taken by the local police; and, therefore, he moved the higher police authorities and thereafter an offence came to be registered at Nadiad Town Police Station against respondents No. 1 to 5 for the offences punishable under Sections 306, 498-A, 201, 176 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code. Respondent No. 2 is the brother of respondent No. 1; and respondent No. 3 is his sister. Respondent No. 4 is the mother of respondent No. 1. Respondent No. 5 is his maternal uncle.2. After completing the investigation...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›