Gujarat Court September 1986 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Amritlal Veljibhai Patel Vs. District Supperintendent of Police and an ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Sep-04-1986
Reported in: (1987)1GLR475
A.P. Ravani, J.1. The petitioner was employed as an armed constable. As per order dated July 7, 1980 he was employed on temporary basis on the conditions mentioned in the order. The petitioner's services have been terminated by order annexure-D dated August 31, 1981 on the ground that his services were not required. The petitioner has challenged the legality and validity of this order.2. In the facts and circumstances of the case it is not necessary to go into any other contention except one, namely, that the petitioner's services have been terminated while his juniors are retained in service. This fact is not controverted by the respondents. On the contrary, in paragraph 6 of the affidavit-in-reply it is admitted that juniors to the petitioner are continued in service. It is contended that on that ground there is no discrimination because 'every individual is enlisted on probation of two years and each case has to be judged separately'. The contention raised by the respondents that th...
Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. K.K. Baxi and ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Sep-02-1986
Reported in: (1987)1GLR417
P.R. Gokulakrishnan, C.J.1. This Letters Patent Appeal is against the order of the learned single Judge passed in Special Civil Application No. 1305 of 1984. In this Special Civil Application the petitioners therein prayed for quashing and setting aside the orders of the Central Government dated 8th December, 1982 and 22nd September, 1983 which are Annexures 'B' and 'C respectively to the Special Civil Application. It is further prayed for declaring the administrative instructions issued in letter dated 6th June, 1978 as void ab initio being inconsistent with the statutory rules and/or being otherwise not applicable for determining the seniority of the petitioners therein. It is further prayed in the Special Civil Application to direct the Central Government to fix the year of allotment of the petitioners at 1969 and 1967 respectively under the seniority rules. After elaborately discussing the various provisions in the rules, namely, the Indian Administrative Service (Regulation of Sen...
Ambaram Nathuram Purani and anr. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Sep-01-1986
Reported in: (1987)1GLR282
R.A. Mehta, J.1. This petition was originally filed for the relief of granting the surplus land under the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') to the petitioners belonging to backward class and economically weaker section of the seciety. Prayer (b) was for ordering the respondents to allot 8157 sq. mts. out of Final Plot No. 32 for constructing houses for the members of the petitioner No. 2-Society. This land originally belonged to a textile mill of which the members of the petitioner No. 2-Society were or are employees. At the hearing of this petition, prayer (b) was deleted at the request of the Learned Counsel for the petitioners and the petition has been prosecuted as public interest litigation on the ground that the auction of the surplus land at market value is contrary to the public interest, common good and ultra vires the provisions of the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act and its purposes. There is also a prayer for declaring ...
Ambararn Nathurarn Purani and anr. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Sep-01-1986
Reported in: AIR1987Guj199
R.A. Mehta, J.1. This petition was originally filed for the relief of granting the surplus land under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act) to the petitioners belonging to backward class and economically weaker section of the society. Prayer (b) was for ordering the respondents to allot 8157 sq. mts. out of final plot No. 32 for constructing houses for the members of the petitioner No. 2-Society. This land originally belonged to a textile mill of which the members of the petitioner No. 2-Society were or are employees. At the hearing of this petition, prayer (b) was deleted at the request of the learned Counsel for the petitioners and the petition has been prosecuted as public interest litigation on the ground that the auction of the surplus land at market value is contrary to the public interest, common good and ultra vires the provisions of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act and its purposes. There is also a prayer for declari...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›