Gujarat Court June 1986 Judgments
Dilip K. Doshi and anr. Vs. Vice Chancellor and ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jun-27-1986
Reported in: (1987)1GLR411
R.A. Mehta, J.1. The question is regarding admission to the Part-time Post Diploma Degree Course (Electronics & Communications). There is no dispute that the two petitioners are eligible for admission to this course as they have passed Diploma in Electronics and Radio Engineering (DERE) after passing Standard XII (Science) examination.2. The contention of the petitioners is that the respondents Nos. 5, 6 and 7 are not eligible and not entitled to be admitted to this course and if these respondents are excluded from admission, the petitioners would get the same. These respondents have been admitted to this course in December 1985 or January 1986 and the semester examination is commencing from 30-6-1986 (three days hereafter) and the petitioners have stated that if they are entitled to be admitted, they are entitled to appear at the examination so that they will not lose their valuable semester or year of the academic career.3. The respondents Nos. 5, 6 and 7 have not passed the Standard...
Tag this Judgment!Ramjibhai Barjulbhai Vs. Bhaglabhai Jeshlabhai and ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jun-26-1986
Reported in: (1987)1GLR143
A.M. Ahmadi, J.1. One Barjul Lala owned agricultural land bearing survey No. 303/2 admeasuring about 18 gunthas in village Barumal, taluka Dharampur, District Valsad. He died leaving behind him five sons, namely, (1) Mansur, (2) Jeram, (3) Jeshla, (4) Ramji (the petitioner) and (5) Patalia. The first two had separated from the joint family during their life time and have since expired. Their heirs do not claim any share in this property. The land, therefore, belonged to Jeshia, Ramji and Patalia as joint owners or co-owners. Jeshla parted with his undivided share in the land in favour of the petitioner, Ramji, for Rs. 468/-. It appears from the order of the Deputy Collector, Valsad, annexure-A, that no registered document has yet been executed in this behalf.2. Respondent No. 1 is the son of Jeshla who transferred his urdivided share in the land to the petitioner for Rs. 468/-. He made an application to the Mamlatdar, Dharampur, complaining that the transfer was in violation of the pro...
Tag this Judgment!Union Government of India Vs. Bai Satyabhama and ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jun-26-1986
Reported in: I(1987)ACC52
R.C. Mankad, J.1. These two appeals and the cross objections arise out of the judgment and award dated August 16, 1977, passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nadiad (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal). Mr. A.G. Pandit, learned Counsel for the respondents in First Appeal No. 1177/77, however sought permission to withdraw the cross objections before the effective hearing of the Appeal. Permission was granted and therefore the cross objections stood disposed of as withdrawn before the effective hearing of the appeal.2. The respondents are the widow and daughter of deceased Bal-krishna Purshottam. The respondents filed claim petition before the Tribunal claiming compensation for the death of the deceased - Balkrishna Purshottam (hereinafter referred to as the deceased), who died as a result of injuries received by him in an accident which took place between about 4.00 and 5.00 P.M. on November 4, 1976 on Vidyanagar Road, District-Kheda. The case of the respondents was that wh...
Tag this Judgment!Chinubhai Kalidas and Brothers Vs. Union of India
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jun-25-1986
Reported in: 1995(77)ELT814(Guj); (1987)1GLR147
Mehta, J.1. The Petitioner firm by this Petition under Arts. 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India has moved this Court for appropriate writs, orders and directions to quash and set aside the order of the Collector, Customs, Ahmedabad-respondent No. 2 herein dated February 25/27, 1986 rejecting the Petitioner's application for grant of licence under Regulation No. 5 of the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 1984 and cancelling the temporary Customs House Agents Licence issued to the petitioner with effect from the date of the said order, and also praying for directions enjoining respondent No. 2 to renew the said temporary licence in favour of the Petitioner so as to enable the Petitioner to carry on business of customs house agents till the applications of the petitioner for permanent licence are finally decided according to law. 2. A few facts need be noticed in order to appreciate the contentions raised in this petition. The firm of M/s. Chinubhai Kalidas & Brothers as c...
Tag this Judgment!PravIn Narayan Luhar Vs. Deputy Police Commissioner and anr.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jun-24-1986
Reported in: 1988CriLJ1339
P.R. Gokulkrishnan, C.J.1. Rule,2. Mr. G.D. Bhatt waives service of rule.3. This is a petition which requires the order passed by the Government of Gujarat Under Section 60 of the Bombay Police Act to be quashed and set aside. The short facts of the case are that the petitioner was exteraed by the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Surat City, under Section 56 of the Bombay Police Act from the limits of the City of Surat, the area under the jurisdiction of Surat Police Commissioner, Surat Rural, Bharuch and Bulsar Districts for a period of two years. The allegations are as follows:1. He is a terrific and fanatical man, and he commits terrific offences like robbery, rape and black-marketing of cinema tickets either he himself or with the help of his associates.2. He commits the offences punishable under Sections 16 and 17 of the IPC and the offences wherein the force and violence are used and he is preparing for that.3. He kidnaps forcibly the innocent persons passing on the road and beats ...
Tag this Judgment!Shivlal Thakershi Gotecha and ors. Vs. the Competent Authority and ors ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jun-20-1986
Reported in: AIR1987Guj155; (1987)1GLR267
ORDER1. In these three petitions the common question which requires determination is whether the Urban Land Tribunal constituted under S. 33, Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, hereinafter referred to as the Urban Land Ceiling Act', has jurisdiction to dismiss the appeal for default or whether the provisions of O. 41, R. 17, Civil P.C., are applicable to the Tribunal and that the Tribunal can dismiss the appeal for default.2. In . Special Civil Application No. 2635/86 the Additional Urban Land Tribunal and Ex-Officio Secretary to the Government, Revenue Department, Ahmedabad, by the order dt. 15th Mar., 1986 dismissed the appeal No. APL/UL/RAJKOT138/1983 filed under S. 33, Urban Land Ceiling Act on the ground that when the appeal was called out, neither the appellants nor their advocate were present. Restoration application was filed by the petitioner. In the said application number of grounds for restoration were given. The Tribunal dismissed the said application by holdin...
Tag this Judgment!New India Assurance Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Gujarat Electricity Board an ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jun-18-1986
Reported in: II(1986)ACC479; [1987]62CompCas364(Guj)
Kapadia, J.1. The present revision application is filed by the petitioners against the order passed on application at exhibit 60 in Special Civil Suit No. 92 of 1982 by the learned Joint Civil Judge (SD), surendranagar, on December 6, 1985. By the said application, it was prayed that the issue regarding jurisdiction and maintainability of the suit be decided first. The learned civil judge, by the aforesaid order, has dismissed the said application with no order as to costs. 2. The short facts of the case can be stated as under: 3. On or about November 11, 1979, at about 11.00 p.m. the jeep bearing the number GTQ 7944 was driven by the driver of the Gujarat electricity Board, Shri Juvansing, and it was going to the Muli for the purpose of the Electricity Board's work. He was driving the jeep on the correct side. When he reached a place between Surendrangar Lok Vidyalaya and Shakpar, public carrier belonging to original defendant no. 1, Bharead Deva Mepabhai, and driven by defendant No. ...
Tag this Judgment!Shrivas Rajeshkumar Satyanarayana Vs. Chairman, Selection Committee an ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jun-17-1986
Reported in: AIR1987Guj4
ORDER1. The petitioner who has passed the Higher Secondary Examination (Standard XII) with Science Stream in the month of March 1985 has filed this petition and prayed for a writ and/or direction or order directing the respondents to give admission to the petitioner for Instrumentation and Control Branch in the reserved quota reserved for Socially and Educationally Backward Class (hereinafter referred to as 'S.E.B. Class'). The petition has been subsequently amended and a further prayer has been made for a Writ, direction or order quashing and setting aside the order dt. 23-1-1986 (Annexure 'h') whereby respondent No. 3 has held that the petitioner did not belong to S.E.B. Class And, therefore, cancelled the certificate (Annexure 'a') issued by the Social Welfare Officer, Ahmedabad District.2. There is no dispute that if the petitioner is found to belong to the S.E.B. Class, he will get admission in the reserved quota for Instrumentation and Control Course at Bhavnagar for which he has...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›