Gujarat Court December 1985 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dr. Poornima M. Shah Vs. Gujarat Stree Kelvani Mandal and ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Dec-04-1985
Reported in: (1986)1GLR714
S.A. Shah, J.1. In this petition interesting question regarding Jurisdiction of the Gujarat Affiliated Colleges Services Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal') arises for decision.2. The petitioner who was the Principal of the Gujarat Stree Kelvani Maudal, Ahmedabad, a College affiliated to the Gujarat University under the Gujarat Affiliated Colleges Services Tribunal Act, 1982 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act')was suspended by the College authority, and the decision was ratified by Vice-Chancellor of the Gujarat University the petitioner challenged the said decision before the Tribunal. On interpretation of Section 14(5) of the Act, the Tribunal came to the conclusion that it had no jurisdiction to entertain and decide the application of the petitioner against her suspension and dismissed the same by its order dated 29-8-1985. Being aggrieved by the said Judgment and order of Tribunal, the petitioner has filed.3. Mr. B.P. Tanna, learned Advocate for the petitioner ha...
Rajput Ranjitsing Jatubha Vs. Vinay Vyas, Sub-divisional Magistrate an ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Dec-04-1985
Reported in: (1986)1GLR478
S.B. Majmudar, J.1. In this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner has challenged the order of externment passed against him by the sub-divisional Magistrate, Palanpur under Section 56 read with Section 39 of the Bombay Police Act and as confirmed in appeal with modification by the Deputy Secretary, Home Department, State of Gujarat.2. The main grievance made by Mr. Raval for the petitioner is that the show cause notice served on the petitioner is hopelessly vague as it given no idea whatsoever to the petitioner as to which nefarious activities were alleged to have been committed in a given area or locality and for which period such nefarious activities were allegedly committed so that the petitioner could have given effective reply to the same. A copy of the show cause notice was placed for our scrutiny.It shall be taken on record of these proceedings. The said show cause notice issued under Section 59 of the Act is in Gujarati. When translated into English, th...
Kantilal Dharamdas Kachoriya Vs. Chief Officer, Palanpur Nagar Palika ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Dec-04-1985
Reported in: (1986)2GLR1214
A.P. Ravani, J.1. In Special Civil Application No. 2787 of 1984 leave to add party is granted. Mr. D.K. Trivedi, Asst. Government Pleader appears on behalf of the newly added party.2. These two petitions are directed against the respondent-Palanpur Municipality. By a Resolution dated February 28, 1984 by which the Municipality decided to construct shopping centre near Power House compound and construct about 300 shops. The Municipality, by the impugned Resolution, further decided that initially all the 300 shops may not be constructed and disposed of and 159 shops be constructed and be sold. It was further decided by the Municipality that for the shops which would be in the front line, premium of Rs. 45.000/- should be taken and for the rest of the shops which would be in the rear part of the shopping centre, premium of Rs. 30,000/- should be taken. The amount of premium was required to be paid by the person concerne in three instalments. It was also resolved that one who-so-ever gets ...
Ramabhai Chhipabhai Koli and ors. Vs. Nathabhai Mavjibhai Parmar and o ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Dec-03-1985
Reported in: (1986)2GLR1396
A.P. Ravani, J.1. The petitioners are the members of Vadodara District Panchayat, Vadodara and all of them have been elected and appointed as members of the Social Justice Committee by a resolution passed in the general body meeting of the District Panchayat held on May 18, 1981. The legality and validity of the resolution was challenged before the Development Commissioner inter alia on the ground that the Social Justice Committee did not consist of any member of Scheduled Caste and therefore, the constitution of the committee was in contravention of the provisions of Section 131 of the Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1961 (hereafter referred to as the Act) and the provisions of Rule 3 of the Gujarat Taluka and District Panchayats Social Justice Committee (Constitution and Functions) Rules, 1976 (hereafter referred to as the Rules). The Development Commissioner held that out of ten members of the Social Justice Committee no member belonged to the Scheduled Caste and, therefore, the constitutio...
AmIn Alias Balam Nurohmedmemon Vs. B.K. Jha, Commissioner of Police an ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Dec-02-1985
Reported in: (1986)1GLR473
A.M. Ahmadi, J.1. The detenu has been taken in detention under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Ordinance, Act, 1985, with a view to preventing him from acting in any manner prejudicial to the maintenance of public order in the City of Ahmedabad. The ground of detention disclose that investigations are pending against the detenu for the possession of liquor, etc; in six cases registered between 1982 and 1985. After setting out the six cases the grounds of detention proceed to state 'Thus you are known as a person dealing in illicit liquor'. Thereafter the detaining authority states that because of this activity of the detenu, there is an atmosphere of danger and fear or insecurity amongst the residents of the locality. The order further recites that since the detenu indulges and continues to indulge in such activities, the maintenance of public order is or is likely to be adversely affected. Except the mechanical reproduction of the requi...
Dr. Arvind C. Shah Vs. State of Gujarat
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Dec-02-1985
Reported in: (1986)1GLR481
N.H. Bhatt, J.1. This application is filed by one Panel Doctor, so called popularly, panel being prepared by the Employee's State Insurance Corporation constituted order the Employee's State Insurance Act, 1948. The Applicant herein and his compounder have been chargesheeted by the Police Inspector, Anti-Corruption Bureau, Ahmedabad for the offence punishable under Sections 161 and 165-A of the Indian Penal Code and also under Section 5(1)(d) punishable under Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, the allegation against them being that this petitioner, while working as a Panel Doctor under the E.S.I. Scheme, Ahmedabad, had accepted Rs. 35/- from one Hansraj Vishwasbhai Chunara for issuing a certificate. This amount was accepted by his compounder, the original accused No. 2 on behalf of the accused No. 1 and, therefore, both the accused were stated to have committed the aforesaid offence.2. The State proceeded on the assumption that the accused and his compounder were public ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›