Gujarat Court September 1984 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mangalbhai Rayajibhai Mistri Vs. Special Secretary, Revenue Deptt. and ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Sep-04-1984
Reported in: (1985)2GLR754
D.H. Shukla, J.1. The petitioner, Mangalbhai Rayajibhai Mistri of Broach, is aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and order passed by the Joint Secretary in Revision Application, dated 4-1-1979 whereby the Joint Secretary upheld the order passed by the Collector (a copy of which is not on record) whereby the Collector had passed an order confiscating a parcel of land bearing Survey No. 86 situated in Village Maktampura, Taluka and District Broach on the ground that the respondent No. 2, Maganbhai Devabhai of Maktampura, Broach had violated Section 5(3) of the Bombay Inferior Village Watans Abolition Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') by entering into an agreement to sell the same parcel of land to the petitioner. The petitioner has assailed the above-stated orders of the Collector as well as the order passed by Revision by the Joint Secretary, dated 4-1-1979, on the ground that the orders are illegal, contrary to law and ultra vires.2. Respondent No. 2, Maganbhai ...
Bhaktibhai Gopalji Bhakta Vs. Collector of Surat and ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Sep-03-1984
Reported in: (1985)1GLR481
S.A. Shah, J.1. The petitioner herein claims that he is the finder of the preasure as also that the treasure was found from the land belonging to him and, therefore, he has challenged the order of the Collector, Surat, and the judgment and order of the Special Secretary, dated 29-8-1978, rejecting the claim of the petitioner both on facts as well as by application of Sections 20 and 21 of the Indian Treasure-Trove Act, 1978 (hereinafter referred to ,as 'the Act') on the ground that the petitioner has failed to give notice as required under Section 4 thereof, and if he is the owner and not the finder, then for punishment under Section 21 of the Act.2. As disclosed from the Order dated 13-12-1977 (Annexure 'A' to the petition) of the Collector, during the digging of the foundation of the new residential building of the petitioner, on 8-2-1977 the Labourers found out silver coins and all of them, except a few, were given by them to the petitioner. However, it appears that neither the peti...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›