Gujarat Court May 1982 Judgments
Asiatic Labour Corporation Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: May-07-1982
Reported in: AIR1983Guj86
ORDERA.M. Ahmadi, J.1. This group of writ petitions which are brought under Article 226 of the Constitution relate to certain goods handling contracts given by the western Railway Administration in respect of the Sabarmati BG-MG Group 63, Bharat-pur BG-MG Group 37 and the Hapa Transhipment point. The petitioners of these petitions claim to have experience and expertise in carrying out goods handling work for the Railway Administration. Their grievance is that as the contracts in respect of the aforesaid three transhipment points were given or extended without inviting open tenders, they were prevented from competing which they were entitled to as citizens of India and. therefore, the Railway Administration had acted in violation of their constitutional rights. They, therefore, pray that the contracts executed in respect of the aforesaid transhipment points should be quashed and the railway administration should be directed to grant fresh contracts in accordance with the normal open ten...
Tag this Judgment!Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Owner and Parties Interested in Moto ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: May-04-1982
Reported in: AIR1983Guj34; (1983)1GLR292
ORDERB.K. Mehta, J.1. By order of May 4, 1982, this suit was stayed for reasons to be subsequently pronounced which are stated hereunder :On behalf of the original first and fourth defendant, the owners of vessel Hoegh Orchid, and their agents in India respectively, a notice of motion was taken out for a stay of the suit and further proceedings mainly on the ground that there was a foreign arbitration clause in the chartered party contract entered into between the plaintiffs on the one hand and the said defendants on the other. In order to appreciate the rival contentions of the parties, it is necessary to set out briefly a few facets which necessitated the filing of the present suit by the Union of India and the Food Corporation of India respectively as plaintiffs Nos. 1 and 2. On or about July 14, 1973 the Union of India, the first plaintiff herein, entered into a chartered party contract with Lief Hoegh and Co., Oslo, Norway who are the owners of the aforesaid vessel Hoegh Orchid wi...
Tag this Judgment!Court Committee, Divya Vasundhara Financiers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Kamlakar Na ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: May-03-1982
Reported in: [1984]56CompCas487(Guj); (1983)1GLR44
B. K. Mehata, J.1. By a common order of March 8, 1982, in Company Application No. 104 of 1981 and Company Application No. 232 of 1980, this court had directed the learned advocate, Mr. R. M. Desai, for the court committee to seek apppropriate directions in the matter of the rights claimed by the Divya Vasundhara Financier Pvt. Ltd., under an agreement to sell a land bearing No. 221 situate within the revenue limits of village Eksar Taluka, Borivili, Greater Bombay, said to have been executed one Kamalakar Narayan Samant in favour of the company by amending the summons in the aforesaid company applications or by taking out fresh summons within two weeks from the date of the said order, and in case of failure to seek amendment, or take fresh summons withing the stipulated period, interim relief granted by this court restraining respondent No. 1 herein from transferring and/or parting with possession of the said land in terms of the instand vacated. As regards the interin relief granted i...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›