Gujarat Court January 1982 Judgments
Bhailalbhai Kanjibhal Patel Vs. Director of State Lotteries and anr.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jan-12-1982
Reported in: (1982)2GLR280
A.M. Ahmadi, J.1. The petitioner by this petition challenges the result of the bumper draw of Gurjar Laxmi, a Gujarat State Lottery, held at the Tagore Hall, Ahmedabad, on 1st January 1982 on diverse grounds. The draw was held in the presence of a panel comprising the Chairman, a Retired Judge of the Court (Mr. Justice C.V. Rane) and two members, namely. Professor S.R. Bhatt and Mr. Myanger, the Collector of Ahmedabad. By a Government Resolution dated 30th July 1981, rules known as The Gujarat State Lottery Rules, 1981 ('the Rules' for short) were formulated. Rule 25 of the Rules lays down the procedure for draws for each series. It inter alia provides that there will be six drums located in a conspicuous place at one end of the hall where the draw is conducted; that the drums will bear certain identification labels; that each one of the six drums will contain ten discs bearing digits 0 to 9; that each disc will be encased in a plastic pouch, so that its number is not seen; and that af...
Tag this Judgment!Ahmedabad Steel Craft and Rolling Mills Vs. State of Gujarat
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jan-11-1982
Reported in: [1983]52STC227(Guj)
Desai, J. 1. The assessee is a dealer registered under the Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act'). The assessee manufactures bars and angles out of iron and steel ingots, billets, scrap, etc., which it purchases from registered dealers. In the three assessment periods, namely, 6th May, 1970, to 31st March, 1971, 1st April, 1971, to 31st March, 1972, and 1st April 1972, to 19th October, 1972, the assessee effected sales of bars and angles. In the bills issued at the time of effecting those sales, no amount was separately mentioned as having been recovered as sales tax, nor was it mentioned in the bills that the sale price was inclusive of sales tax. In the books of account maintained by the assessee, however, entries were made whereunder a specific amount was bifurcated from month to month out of the amount recovered by way of sale price and it was separately shown as the amount of sales tax. At the time of furnishing the quarterly returns, the amount of sale...
Tag this Judgment!Patel Jasmat Sangaji Padalia Vs. Gujarat Electricity Board, Baroda and ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jan-11-1982
Reported in: AIR1982Guj264; (1982)2GLR104
N.H. Bhatt, J.1. This is a revision application brought to this Court by the original plaintiff of the regular Civil Suit No. 224 of 1980 pending in the Court of the Civil Judge Q. D.), Dhoraji and who was the respondent before the Appellate Authority at Gondal in the Civil Misc. Appeal No. 53 of 1980 on his Me. This applicant-plaintiff had filed the said suit in the Court of said Civil Judge (J. D.), Dhoraji for the purpose of getting an injunction against the Electricity Board, its Executive Engineer and its Deputy Engineer, restraining them from installing any pillars or electric line in his land S. No. 528 situated in the same village Moti Marad. During the pendency of the suit, he had filed an application, Ex. 20, for a temporary injunction by invoking provisions of 0. 39, Rr. 1and 2 of the Civil P. C. The learned trial Judge had passed the ex parte order below that application in the following terms:-'Heard. Read the plaint, application and affidavit. It transpires that Electrici...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›