Gujarat Court March 1980 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
State Bank of India Vs. M.V. Raval
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Mar-03-1980
Reported in: (1981)22GLR86
A.M. Ahmadi, J.1. By this Writ Petition the State Bank of India challenges the Award passed by the Industrial Tribunal dated 19th September 1979 whereby the Tribunal held that the services of the respondent, M.V. Raval, were illegally terminated and directed his reinstatement with full back wages with effect from the date of termination. The Tribunal further directed the petitioner-Bank to pay the arrears of wages within one month from the date of the publication of the award in the Gazette.2. The facts giving rise to this petition, briefly stated, are as under. The respondent was employed as a Clerk in the Mehsana Branch of the petitioner Bank by their letter dated 10th October 1974. His services were, however, terminated on 9th June 1975 without assigning any reason and without making payment in lieu of notice. The workman thereupon made representations to the Bank and ultimately approached the Conciliation Officer, Government of India, for intervention under the provisions of the In...
Hasmukhlal Harilal Ghelani Vs. Fakir Dadasha Kadarsha and anr.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Mar-03-1980
Reported in: (1981)22GLR262
G.T. Nanavati, J.1. The petitioner is a Sarpanch of Shivrajgadh Gram Panchayat. On 10-6-1976, the Panchayat passed a Resolution on the basis of some complaints received by it against opponent No. 1. The said complaints were to the effect that (he activities of opponent No. 1 were prejudicial to the maintenance of public order, and, therefore, it was necessary that appropriate action under the provisions of the MISA should be taken against him. After referring to the said complaints, it has been stated in the Resolution that the Collector and D.S.P. of Rajkot should be requested to take immediate action against opponent No. 1 before any untoward incident took place or before the situation deteriorated any further. According to opponent No. 1 the contents of the said Resolution are defamatory; and, therefore, he has filed a complaint against the petitioner and 13 others who were parties to the said Resolution, for an offence punishable under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code, in the C...
Kantilal Manilal Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat-ii
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Mar-01-1980
Reported in: (1980)18CTR(Guj)378; [1981]130ITR411(Guj)
P.D. Desai, J.1. The assessee, a partnership firm, was a dealer in medicines. It return of income for the assessment year 1969-70, the previous year being S. Y. 2024, was filed on May 12, 1969. The assessee returned an income of Rs. 7,874. In the course of the assessment proceedings, the ITO found, upon verification of the cash book of the assessee, 26, 1967, was not correctly made. The total which should have been struck at Rs. 14,105 was actually worked out at Rs. 17,605. The cash book thus reflected excess cash in the sum of Rs. 3,500 in the hands of the assessee. When asked to explain, the assessee pointed out that the discrepancy was the result of a totaling mistake and that the same was set right by an entry made in the cash book on October 2, 1968, whereunder the cash balance as on that day was reduced by Rs. 3,500. According to the assessee, the sum of Rs. 3,500 was, in fact, never in its hands during the interfering period. The ITO found the explanation to be untrue because on...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›