Gujarat Court January 1980 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
K.T. Doctor Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat Iv
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jan-09-1980
Reported in: (1980)15CTR(Guj)43; [1980]124ITR501(Guj)
Divan, C.J. 1. In this reference, at the instance of the assessee, the following three question have been referred to this High Court for its opinion : 'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in law in permitting the revenue to raise the contention to the effect that independently of section 60 of the Income-tax Act, the business in question belonged to the assessee and not to the K. T. Doctor Family Trust (2) If the answer to the above question No. 1 is in affirmative, was the Tribunal justified in law in deciding the said contention without remanding the case to the lower authorities for good reason after giving reasonable opportunity to the assessee to lead necessary evidence on the said question (3) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in law in holding that the business carried on by the assessee was not carried on by him for and on behalf of the K. T. Doctor Familm Trust 2. The fac...
Nadiad Nagarpalika, Nadiad Vs. Vithalbhai Zaverbhai Patel and ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jan-08-1980
Reported in: AIR1980Guj161; (1980)GLR792
ORDER1. This is a revision application by the Nadiad Municipality, the, defendant in the Special Civil Suit No. 208 of 1975, filed by the respondents original plaintiffs against the municipality in the court of the Civil Judge, (S. D.) Nadiad. The suit is filed for recovery of possession of the suit land on the ground that the petitioner-municipality has trespassed upon the land of the plaintiffs, who are trustees of a registered public trust. The Municipality appeared in the suit and inter alia contended that the petitioner-municipality had been put into possession of the suit land by the then Manager of the Public Trust for the purpose of, making a public garden on the suit land and acting on that permissive possession, the Municipality had put up a public garden for the use of the public, after incurring heavy expenditure. The Municipality, therefore, contended 'that the suit for possession, which was filed without the permission of the Charity Commissioner is required under Section...
Bhil Seva Mandal, Dahod and ors. Vs. Naik Shana Daboda and ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jan-07-1980
Reported in: AIR1980Guj163; (1980)0GLR784
ORDER1. This is a revision application by the original defendant of the Civil Suit No. 10 of 1978, pending in the Court of the Civil Judge (J. D.) Baria in Panchmahals District. This application is directed against the order passed by the learned trial Judge below on the opponents (plaintiffs) application Ex. M As per the order passed by the learned trial Judge, the issue about tenancy being issue No. 8 at Ex. 16 was deleted by the learned Judge at the instance of the opponents-plaintiffs. The original defendants have, therefore, invoked the revisional jurisdiction of this court, by contending that jurisdictional illegality has been committed by the learned trial Judge by deleting the said issue.2. The opponents-plaintiffs have filed the suit against these petitioners' defendants for possession of a piece of land on the ground that the defendants are trespassers on the land of their ownership. The defendants inter alia contend m the suit that they are tenants (farmers) on the land. Bec...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›