Gujarat Court August 1974 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jekisondas Maganlal and ors. Vs. Abdul Rehman Haji Ahmedbhai and ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Aug-09-1974
Reported in: AIR1975Guj205
ORDER1. The Plaintiffs filed Regular Civil Suit No. 265 of 1966 against the defendants for recovering possession of the suit premises on the grounds that the defendants Nos. 1, 2 and 3, the original tenants, had unlawfully sub-let a part of the suit premises to the defendants Nos. 4, 5 and 6, that the defendants Nos. 1. 2 and 3 had constructed Permanent structures in the suit Premises without obtaining the permission of the plaintiffs in writing, that the defendants had committed waste in the suit premises, that the Plaintiffs require the-suit Premises reasonably and bona fide for their occupation and that the defendants Nos. 1, 2 and 3 had split up the original tenancy in two parts. The Plaintiffs also pleaded that the defendants had been denying the plaintiffs title and have not been observing the terms of the tenancy.2. The defendants in their turn challenged the validity of the statutory notice served by the plaintiffs upon the defendants Nos. 1, 2 and 3.3. The learned Trial Judge ...
Mangalaji Suraji and ors. Vs. Govindlal Samaldas Soni
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Aug-01-1974
Reported in: (1975)16GLR486
T.U. Mehta, J.1. The appellants of this appeal were proceeded against by the respondent before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Ahmedabad, for obtaining an award of Rs. 20.000/- as compensation for the injuries received by him during the course of an accident which occurred on 25th July, 1970 at about 6.00 p.m. near Gandhi Bridge traffic circle on the Wadaj side road. The learned Judge of the Tribunal having awarded the amount of Rs. 15,100/- as total compensation against the present appellants, this appeal is preferred by them. The respondent has, however, preferred cross-objections claiming the full amount of Rs. 20,000/-.2. Short facts of the case are that the respondent is a clerk of advocates working in High Court. On 25th July, 1970 after the court hours at about 6.00 p.m. he was returning home and going to his house on his scooter towards the Wadaj side. At that time he came from the Gandhi Bridge side, took a turn towards the Wadaj road near the Income-tax office and then e...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›