Gujarat Court June 1967 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ajitrai Shivprasad Mehta Vs. Bai Vasumati
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jun-20-1967
Reported in: AIR1969Guj48; (1969)GLR253
J.B. Mehta, J.1. The petitioner husband has filed this appeal under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, hereinafter referred to as 'the Act', as his original petition for obtaining decree of the nullity of his marriage or for divorce had been dismissed by trial Court.2. The short facts which have given rise to this appeal are as under :--3. The petitioner and the respondent are Brahmins by caste. The petitioner is deaf and dumb from the birth. The petitioner's father originally resided at Umreth, while the original place of residence of the respondent is Vaso. But the parents of both parties had been residing at Ahmedabad since many years. According to the petitioner he was married to the respondent at Vaso on 15th April 1954 according to the religious rites and as per the custom of the community. It is the petitioner's case that he relied upon the representations made by the respondent's father to the petitioner's father. After the marriage the respondent came to reside with the petitioner ...
Nandkishore Sakarlal Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jun-19-1967
Reported in: (1968)0GLR121; (1967)IILLJ806Guj
1. Criminal Appeals Nos. 861 to 863 of 1965 are filed against an order passed by the City Magistrate, Eleventh Court, Ahmedabad, in each of the criminal cases convicting Nandkishore Sakarlal, the occupier of the Sarangpur Cotton ., Ahmedabad, for having committed an offence under S. 63 read with S. 92 of the Factories Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), and sentencing him in each case to pay a fine of Rs. 210, in default to undergo simple imprisonment for one month. 2. Criminal Appeals Nos. 1154 to 1156 of 1965 are filed by Nandkishore Sakarlal, the occupier of the Sarangpur Cotton ., Ahmedabad (hereinafter referred to as the factory), against the orders of acquittal passed by the learned Magistrate acquitting Manecklal Jinabhai Kot, the manager, Harivallabh Maganlal, the supervisor, stamping department, and Chandulal Lallubhai the timekeeper of the Sarangpur Cotton ., of the charge under S. 63 read with S. 92 of the Act. All these appeals raise common questions of law and ...
Shah Champshi Kunverji Vs. Soni Bhailal Dauji
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jun-19-1967
Reported in: AIR1968Guj189; (1967)GLR1043
(1) The facts giving rise to this appeal are quite simple. Soni Bhailal Damji of Bhuj obtained a decree for a sum of Rs. 1329-3-6 together with costs of the suit and future interest against the appellant-defendant in Regular Civil Suit No. 8 of 1952 in the Court of the Civil Judge (J.D.) at Bhuj. The suit was decided on 31-12-52. A decree in pursuance of the judgment was drawn up and signed by the learned judge on 2-2-53. The plaintiff judgment-creditor thereafter filed Darkhast No. 12 of 1956 in the same Court for recovering the amount due under the decree against the defendant-judgment-debtor. That was filed on 27-1-56. Before registering the Darkest, the office had raised a point as to how the Darkhast was in time. From the endorsement made on the Darkhast application, it appears that after hearing the learned advocate for the judgment creditor the Darkhast was ordered to be registered. Notice was directed to be issued to the judgment-debtor. The notice had come back unserved as the...
Narandas Tolaram and ors. Vs. Bhagsingh Kirpalsingh Khalsa and anr.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jun-07-1967
Reported in: 1968CriLJ1136
ORDERJ.M. Sheth, J.1. This is a revision petition filed by the original opponents Nos. 1 to 4 under Section 485 of the Criminal P.C. against the order passed by the learned Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Mehsana, in exercise of his powers under Section 145(4), Proviso 3, in a proceeding taken out by the present opponent No. 1 against the present petitioners, under Section 145 of the Criminal P.C.2. The preliminary facts giving rise to this revision petition are briefly stated as under:The opponent No. 1, Sardar Bhagsingh Kirpal singh Khalsa is a partner of M/s. Raj Construction Company, Ahmedabad. The present petitioners are the office-bearers and leading members of the Mehsana Sindhi Co-operative Housing Society, Mehsana. As stated at the Bar by the learned Advocate Shri Sheth, the petitioners Nos. 1 and 2 are the Chairman and Secretary of the said society respectively and the petitioners Nos. 3 and 4 are the members of the Managing Society of the said Society M/s. Raj Construction Co. ar...
Keshavlal Pehhalabhai Patel and anr. Vs. the State of Gujarat and anr.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jun-07-1967
Reported in: AIR1968Guj266; 1968CriLJ1418; (1967)8GLR1061
ORDER(1) The petitioners, who were the original accused Nos. 1 and 2, were charge-sheeted to the Court of the City Magistrate, Ahmedabad. They were accused of offences punishable under Sections 420-120B of the Indian Penal Code. The case was instituted upon a police report. On 11th January, 1967, it was ascertained that copies of the police-papers, referred to in Section 173 of the Civil Procedure Code were furnished to both the accused and the case was adjourned to 12th January, 1967 for the statement and charge by the learned City Magistrate, Ahmedabad, Mr. H. K. Damani. On account of the sick-note of the Defence advocate, the case was adjourned to 16th January, 1967 for the above said purpose. On that day, the learned City Magistrate framed the charge, Ex. 2 against the present petitioners for the aforesaid offences. The statements of the accused were recorded and the case was adjourned to 23rd January 1967 for evidence. On 23rd January, 1967, the petitioner No. 1, Bhikhabhai gave a...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›