Gujarat Court July 1962 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
State of Gujarat Vs. Lasanmal Manumal Mangalani and anr.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jul-28-1962
Reported in: 1963CriLJ533; (1963)GLR270
Shelat, J.1-10. x x x x x x11. It was next contended by Mr. Baxi that the Chemical Analyser's certificate was not admissible in evidence inasmuch as the Assistant Chemical Analyser who has signed the certificate is not the Assistant Chemical Analyser to the Government of Gujarat. Relying upon our judgment in Criminal Appeal No. 424 of 1961, D/- 19-6-1962 (Guj), where we considered the provisions of Section 510 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Mr. Baxi argued that the Chemical Analyser or the Assistant Chemical Analyser whose certificate is made admissible under Section 510, Cr.P.C. must be a Chemical Analyser or an Assistant Chemical Analyser to the Government of the State where the prosecution is launched and, therefore, the Assistant Chemical Analyser, who has signed (the certificate in this case, being the Assistant Chemical Analyser attached to the State of Maharashtra, the certificate was not admissible. Now the raid and the seizure of the bottles in this case took place on Janu...
Manilal Maganlal Mistry Vs. Jasumatiben D/O Mistry Ramjibhai Bavjibhai
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jul-25-1962
Reported in: (1964)5GLR407
P.N. Bhagwati, J.1. This Revision Application arises out of a suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for a declaration that the marriage between the plaintiff and the defendant was null and void on the ground that the defendant was impotent at the time of the marriage and continued to be so until the institution of the suit. The suit was obviously filed by the plaintiff against the defendant under Section 12 of the Hindu Marriage Act. In the suit an application was made by the defendant under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act praying that the plaintiff be directed to pay to the defendant the expenses of the suit and maintenance pendente lite. The learned Civil Judge made an order on the application on 18th January 1960 directing the plaintiff to pay to the defendant a sum of Rs. 100/- in respect of the expenses of the suit and a sum of Rs. 40/- per month as and by way of maintenance during the pendency of the suit. The plaintiff thereafter applied for time for two months ...
State Vs. Dhulaji Bavaji
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jul-19-1962
Reported in: AIR1963Guj234; 1963CriLJ273; (1962)GLR409
Shelat, J.1. This is an appeal against an order of acquittal by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Kalol, whereby he acquitted the accused Dhulaji Bavaji of the charges under Section 66(1)(b) and Section 85(1)(i) and Section 55(1)(iii) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949.2. On the 23rd of October 1959, P. S. T. pesal with a police Patty had gone to make prohibition raid in the village Indroda in Kalol Taluka. While they were returning they came to village Shertha. In consequence of certain information received there, the police party went to a place called Thakarda vas where they found the accused in a state of intoxication and lying on a public road. The Police Officer found that the accused was not able to take care of himself and not able to walk steadily and his breath was smelling of liquor. He was also not able to talk in a coherent manner. A Panchanama of the physical condition of the accused was thereafter recorded and the accused was then sent to the Medical Officer...
Bai Hajrabibi D/O. HuseIn Habib Vs. Shaikh Hamed Husein
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jul-18-1962
Reported in: (1963)4GLR483
P.N. Bhagwati, J.1. This Revision Application is directed against an order passed by the Civil Judge Junior Division Olpad rejecting an application of the plaintiff for deleting issues Nos. 3 5 and 6 and not referring them to the Mamlatdar for his decision under the provisions of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the Tenancy Act). The suit in which this order was made was filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for recovery of possession of certain lands situate within the jurisdiction of the Court of the Civil Judge Junior Division Olpad. The plaintiff alleged that the defendant was a tenant of the plaintiff in respect of the suit lands and that since the defendant had denied the title of the plaintiff in respect of the suit lands the plaintiff was entitled to recover possession of the suit lands from the defendant. The defendant in his written statement denied that the plaintiff was the sole and exclusive owner of the suit lands and c...
ibrahim Akbarali Vs. State and anr.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jul-16-1962
Reported in: 1963CriLJ664; (1963)GLR493
ORDERP.N. Bhagwati, J.1. This Revision Application is directed against an order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Baroda, dismissing a Revision Application preferred by the accused against an order of the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Chhota Udepur, rejecting the application of the accused for a direction against the State not to proceed with the sale of certain forest produce pending the hearing and final disposal of the complaint filed by the State against the accused. The Range Forest Officer of Jetpur-Pavi filed a complaint against the accused in the Court of the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Chhota Udepur, for offences under clauses (e), (f) and (g) of Sub-section (1) of Section 26 of the Indian Forest Act on the allegation that the accused had in a forest, in respect of which a notification had been-issued by the State Government under Section 4, caused damage by negligence in felling trees and cutting timber, made charcoal by burning trees and removed the forest p...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›