Gujarat Court March 1962 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jaswantlal Chunilal Brahmbhat Vs. Narsinhbhai Nathabhai Patel
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Mar-02-1962
Reported in: (1963)4GLR157
P.N. Bhagwati, J.1. The defendant in this Revision Application challenges an order made by the Second Joint Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedabad and contends that the order is contrary to the provisions of Section 8A of the Court-fees Act 1870 The Revision Application arises out of a suit filed by the plaintiff to recover possession of certain premises from the defendant. The plaintiff filed the suit on the ground that the defendant was a gratuitous licensee in respect of the premises and that the licence having been determined the defendant was bound and liable to hand over possession of the premises to the plaintiff. The plaintiff valued the subject matter of the suit for the purpose of Court-fees and jurisdiction at Rs. 21,200/-. The defendant in his written statement raised in the main three contentions. The first contention was that the defendant was not a licensee but was a tenant of the plaintiff at the rent of Rs. 65/- per month. The second contention was that the suit being a...
State Vs. Harilal Jethalal
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Mar-01-1962
Reported in: AIR1963Guj36; 1963CriLJ286; (1963)GLR50
Miabhoy, J.1. This is an appeal from an appellate order dated November 4, 1960, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Gondal, acquitting the respondent Harilal Jethalal of the offences under Section 27, read with Section 18 (a) (i) and (2) of the Drugs Act, The respondent was prosecuted before the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Upleta, for the above offences. The learned Magistrate found that the offences had been established and sentenced the respondent to pay a fine of Rs. 100/- for each of the offences, in default, to suffer simple imprisonment for two months for each offence. The respondent went in appeal to the Sessions Court at Rajkot and the appeal was disposed off by the learned Additional Sessions Judge who reversed the order of conviction and sentence.2. The facts leading up to this prosecution are not in dispute. The respondent conducts a cutlery-cum-medicine shop at Upleta under the firm name of M/s Hiraial Jethalal and Co. He has obtained a licence, u...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›