Delhi Court June 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dr. Neha Chauhan vs Himanshu Pokharia
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jun-17-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 1042/2026 & CM APPL. 38688/2026 DR. NEHA CHAUHAN ..Petitioner Through: Ms. Zeba Khair, Ms. Sitwat Nabi & Ms. Harshita Singhal, Advs.VersusHIMANSHU POKHARIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sagar, Sr. Adv. with Ashok Kumar Jha, Adv. along with Respondent in person & Ms. Khyati Raje, Minor Child.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAORDER% 17.06.20261. In compliance of the order dated 15.06.2026, the Respondent along with minor child is present in the Court.2. During the pre-lunch session, the Court had interacted with the minor child as well as the Petitioner. The Petitioner and the minor child also spent one and a half hours with each other during the course of the day.3. When the matter was taken up again during the post-lunch session, thelearned Counsel for the Parties, after interacting with the Petitioner and the minor child, submitted that some understanding has been arrived at between the Parties to the...
Abhishek Singh vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jun-17-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 2239/2026 & CRL.M.A. 18043/2026 ABHISHEK SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Himanshu Kundu, Adv.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for the StateCORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAINORDER% 17.06.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. CRL.M.A. 18043/2026 (Exemption)2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. BAIL APPLN. 2239/20263. The present application has been filed under Section 483 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking extension of the interim bail granted to the Applicant/Petitioner by this Court vide order dated 29.05.2026 in Bail Application No. 1567/2026 in FIR No. 337/2024 registered at Police Station Patparganj Industrial Area under Sections4. Learned counsel for the Applicant/Petitioner submits that the Applicantwas granted interim bail to take care of his wife and to complete the admission formalities of his...
Kklk College of Pharmacy vs Pharmacy Council of India
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jun-17-2026
$~SB25 & 26* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 8247/2026 & CM APPL. 39022/2026 PRAKASH MAHAVIDYALAYA ..Petitioner Through: Mr. Mayank Manish, Mr. Ravi Kant & Mr. Vineet Upadhyay, Advs.VersusPHARMACY COUNCIL OF INDIA ..Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh & Mr. Divyansh Singh, Advs. AND + W.P.(C) 8248/2026 & CM APPL. 39023/2026 KKLK COLLEGE OF PHARMACY ..Petitioner Through: Mr. Mayank Manish, Mr. Ravi Kant & Mr. Vineet Upadhyay, Advs.VersusPHARMACY COUNCIL OF INDIA ..Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh & Mr. Divyansh Singh, Advs.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAORDER% 17.06.20261. The learned Counsel for the Petitioners states that the Petitioners would like to withdraw the present Petitions with liberty to file fresh Petitions, if required.2. Accordingly, the present Petitions as well as the pending Applications are dismissed as withdrawn. TEJAS KARIA, J (VACATION JUDGE) JUNE 17, 2026 gsrThis is a digitally signed order. The aut...
Jagdish Lal & Ors. vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jun-17-2026
$~SB-19* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 8190/2026, CM APPL. 38914/2026 & CM APPL. 38915/2026 JAGDISH LAL & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Shlok Sudhan, Advocate.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vikas Chopra, Standing Counsel with Neeraj Kumar, Advocate for MCD.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAORDER% 17.06.20261. Learned Counsel for the Petitioners submits that the Petitioners wish to withdraw the present Writ Petition.2. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. TEJAS KARIA, J (VACATION JUDGE) JUNE 17, 2026/smsThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/06/2026 at 10:46:21...
Abhishek vs the State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jun-17-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 2252/2026 ABHISHEK .....Petitioner Through: Mr. D.V. Goyal, Advocate.versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar- APP for State (through VC). Inspector Om Vir Singh (PS Samaypur Badli).CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAORDER% 17.06.20261. The present Application has been filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking Interim Bail for a period of four weeks to appear for his examination.2. The learned Counsel for the Applicant submitted that the examschedule of the Applicant starts with effect from 18.06.2026 to 20.06.2026 for the 2nd Semester University Exams. It is further submitted on behalf of the Applicant that the exam schedule was received by the Applicants parents on 15.06.2026 at 4:00 PM.3. The Applicant is registered in the Bachelor of Arts (B.A.) course in S.M.R.C.K. College, Bazar Samiti, Samastipur, Bihar-848104, and videorder dated 16.03.2026, this ...
Khatiza Begam vs Salma Khan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-16-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on: 18th March, 2026 Pronounced on: 16th June, 2026+ RSA 17/2025SMT. KHATIZA BEGAM W/o Late Sh. Sheikh Mohd. Hakim R/o H. No. F-206, Phase- II J.J. Colony, Sector- 3, Pappan Kalan New Delhi-110075 .....Appellant Through: Ms. Namita Roy and Ms. Gopa Biswas, Advocates.versusMS. SALMA KHAN D/o Sh. Mumtaz Khan R/o B-192 & 193, Sector- 3 Phase- III, J.J. Colony, Pappan Kalan, Dwarka, New Delhi- 110075 .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mohd Moonis Abbasi, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J. 1. The present Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as CPC) has been filed against the Judgment and Decree dated 14.10.2024 passed in RCA No.RSA 17/2025 Page 1 of 18 Signature Not Verified Signed By:VIKAS ARORA Signing Date:16.06.2026 17:50:44 1157/2024, whereby the learned ADJ set aside the Judgment dat...
M/S Adigear International vs Sunita Jain
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-16-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on: 13th March, 2026 Pronounced on: 16th June, 2026+ RFA 172/2020M/S ADIGEAR INTERNATIONAL [A Partnership Firm] Through its Partners, Sh. Pran Nath Khanna [wrongly mentioned as Sh. Prem Khanna], Sh. Sandeep Khanna, Sh. Sanjay Khanna and Sh. Sameer Khanna. Having its Office at: Plot No.150, Sector - 4, IMT Manesar, Gurugram, Haryana. .....Appellant Through: Mr. Gaurav Vig, Advocate.versusSUNITA JAIN W/o Late Sh. Bharat Bhushan Jain, Proprietor, M/s Bharat Cottons, C/o 316, Kucha Ghanshi Ram, Chandni Chowk, Delhi. ....Respondent Through: Appearance not given.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAJ U D G M E N TNEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.1. Regular First Appeal under Section 96 read with Order XLI Rule 1of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as CPC) hasRFA 172/2020 Page 1 of 12 been preferred by the Defendant/Appellant, M/s Adigear International against Judgment and Decree dated 11.09...
Sulakhan Singh vs Kanwarjit Singh Kochar & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-16-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on: 18th March, 2026 Pronounced on: 16th June, 2026 + RFA 286/2020 SULAKHAN SINGH S/o Shri Mota Singh Proprietor of S.S. Interiors & Constructions, At TA-28/1, Tuglakabad Extn., Kalkaji, New Delhi .....Appellant Through: Mr. Vijay Datt Gahtori, Mr. Shankar Datt Gahtori, Advocatesversus1. KANWARJIT SINGH KOCHAR2. KANWALJIT SINGH KOCHARBoth R/o H-25, Jangpura Extn., New Delhi Also at: Palam Show Room, RZ-123, Vaishali; Palam, Dabri Road, Dwarka, New Delhi -110045 .....Respondents Through: Mr. Arush Kapoor, AdvocateCORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAJ U D G M E N TNEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.1. Regular First Appeal under Section 96 read with Order XLI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as CPC) has been Signed By:VIKAS RFA 286/2020 Page 1 of 18 filed by the Appellant against the Judgment dated 19.06.2020, whereby the learned ADJ, has dismissed the Suit filed by the Plaintiff/Appel...
National Power Training Institute vs Sunehari Bagh Builders Pvt. Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-16-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on: 24th March, 2026 Pronounced on: 16th June, 2026 + RFA 54/2022 NATIONAL POWER TRAINING INSTITUTE Through its Principal Director Northern Region, Badarpur, New Delhi. .....Appellant Through: Mr. Prashant Shukla and Ms. Ojasvi, Advocates.versusSUNEHARI BAGH BUILDERS PVT. LTD. Engineers & Contractors, 306, Sunehari Bagh Apartments, Sector-13, Rohini, New Delhi. ....Respondents Through: Mr. Bharat Bhushan Dharmani, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAJ U D G M E N TNEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.1. Present Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the CPC, 1908,has been preferred on behalf of the Appellant / National Power Training Institute against Judgment and Decree dated 03.09.2021 passed by learned ADJ-02, New Delhi, whereby Application filed by the Appellant/Defendant under Order XXXVII Rule 3(5) CPC, seeking Leave to Defend, was dismissed and the Suit was decreed for a sum of Rs.59...
Sunil Vadehra vs Aithent Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-16-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on: 05th February, 2026 Pronounced on: 16th June, 2026 + RFA 546/2024 SUNIL VADEHRA S/o Shri Sohan Lal Vadehra, R/o C-34, Nizamuddin East, New Delhi .....Appellant Through: Mr. S. C. Anand Advocate.versusAITHENT TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. Through its Chief Executive Officer, A-186, Okhla Industrial Area, Phase-I, New Delhi-110020. .....Respondent Through: Ms. Venancio D'Costa and Ms. Gauri Goel, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAJ U D G M E N TNEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.1. The present Regular First Appeal under Section 96 read with OrderXLI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as CPC) has been preferred by the Appellant/Plaintiff, Sunil Vadhera, assailing the Judgment and Decree dated 18.04.2024, whereby the Suit for Recovery of Rs.8,89,381/- filed by the Appellant/Plaintiff has been dismissed, by the learned District Judge, Delhi.RFA 546/2024 Page 1 of 152. The Ap...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »