Delhi Court June 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mohd Rahat vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jun-12-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 2221/2026 MOHD RAHAT .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Avinash Pandey, Advocate.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for State.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 12.06.2026 CRL.M.A. 18003/2026 (Seeking Exemption)1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.2. The Application stands disposed of. BAIL APPLN. 2221/20263. First Bail Application under Section 482 BNSS read with Section 528BNSS has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner seeking Anticipatory Bail in case FIR No.0186/2026 under Section 110, 3(5) BNS registered at Police Station I.P. Estate.4. It is submitted that a neighbourhood fight had taken place and partiesof both sides got injuries. The cross-FIR No.185/2026 has been recorded. It is also submitted that some of the family members of the Applicant had also suffered injuries. The Applicants are willing to join the investigation. A prayer is made that the Anticipator...
Satya Prakash Bagla vs State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jun-10-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 824/2026 SATYA PRAKASH BAGLA .....Applicant Through: Mr. Gaurav Sarkar, Mr. Sanchit Agarwal, Ms. Aparna Iyer, Mr. Abhishek Jaiswal and Mr. Priyanshu Raj, Advs.versusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: SI Dipesh Malik, PS EOW Delhi.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAINORDER% 10.06.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. Learned counsel appearing for the Applicant submits that he wishes towithdraw the present bail application, as the Applicant has since been granted default bail by the learned Trial Court.3. In view of the aforesaid submission, the present bail application isdismissed as withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.4. The order be uploaded forthwith on the website.MADHU JAIN, J.(VACATION JUDGE)JUNE 10, 2026ab/mThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by s...
Ashok Kumar Pal vs Directorate of Enforcement
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-10-2026
$~35 & 36* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 10th June, 2026 + BAIL APPLN. 1136/2026 ASHOK KUMAR PAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. N Hariharan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Varun Chandiok, Mr. Alok Kumar, Mr. Sidharth Yadav, Mr. Arpit Mahendru, Advs.versusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT .....Respondent Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Spl. Counsel for ED and Mr. Vivek Gurnani, Panel Counsel with Mr. Pranjal Tripathi, Mr. Kanishk Maurya, Ms. Tanvi Jain, Advs. + CRL.M.C. 7670/2025 ASHOK KUMAR PAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. N Hariharan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Varun Chandiok, Mr. Alok Kumar, Mr. Sidharth Yadav, Mr. Arpit Mahendru, Advs.versusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT .....Respondent Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Spl. Counsel for ED and Mr. Vivek Gurnani, Panel Counsel with Mr. Pranjal Tripathi, Mr. Kanishk Maurya, Ms. Tanvi Jain, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAINMadhu Jain, J. (Oral)1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.BAIL APPLN. 1136/2026NEGI BAIL APPL...
Udayveer Singh vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jun-10-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 892/2026 UDAYVEER SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjeev Panda and Mr. Neeraj Kant Singh, Advs.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for the StateCORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 10.06.2026CRL.M.A. 17968/20261. Application under Section 528 of BNSS has been filed on behalf ofthe Petitioner seeking withdrawal of BAIL APPLN. 892/2026, on the ground that Supplementary Chargesheet has been filed and the Petitioner intends to file a fresh Bail Application before the appropriate Forum.2. In view of submissions made, Application is allowed.3. Accordingly, BAIL APPLN. 892/2026 along with pendingApplications, if any, stands dismissed as withdrawn.4. Next date of hearing, i.e. 06.08.2026, stands cancelled.NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA(VACATION JUDGE)JUNE 10, 2026/RThis is a digitally signed order. The aut...
Rahul@Pankaj@Fauzi vs State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jun-10-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN.1349/2026 RAHUL@PANKAJ@FAUZI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Satish Chand, AdvocateversusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Utkarsh, APP for the StateCORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 10.06.20261. Bail Application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. read with Section 482Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of the Applicant for grant of interim bail for 06 months on account of treatment of Kochs (Miliary TB+TBM) ailment.2. It is submitted in the Application that the Applicant is facing trial inFIR No. 227/2020 under Sections 307/34 IPC read with Section 27 Arms Act, P.S. Wazirabad, Delhi.3. The Applicant is suffering from serious ailments while lodged inMandoli Jail No. 13, Delhi. The Applicant was granted Interim Bail on 20.12.2025 on medical grounds. He got admitted in GTB Hospital by jail authorities and was released from judicial custody on 23.12.2025. Subsequently, he was discha...
Achin Birpalia & Ors. vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jun-10-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3499/2026, CRL.M.A. 14200/2026 ACHIN BIRPALIA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ankur Chawla, Mr. Arshdeep Singh, Mr. Gurpreet Singh, Mr. Bakul Jain, Mr. Harsh Yadav, Mr. Harshit Melti and Mr. Chetan Nagpal, Advs.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Utkarsh, APP for the StateCORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 10.06.20261. Learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present Petition.2. In view of the submissions made, the present Petition is permitted to be withdrawn.3. The Petition stands disposed of accordingly. NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA (VACATION JUDGE) JUNE 10, 2026 vaThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/06/2026 at 11:40:35...
Ramesh Chandra Dubey and Anr vs Nandlal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-10-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on: 18th March, 2026 Pronounced on: 10th June, 2026 + RFA 482/2023, CM APPL. 32132/2023, CM APPL. 67532/2023 and CM APPL. 20474/20241. RAMESH CHANDRA DUBEY S/o late Sh BR Dubey Flat No. 121 Mithila Apartment I P Extn Apartment2. SANJAY DUBEYS/o RC Dubey Flat 126 Maitri Apartment, I P Extn Patpar Ganj Delhi 110092 .....Appellants Through: Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Tushar Bhushan, Mr. Yojit Mehra and Mr. Amartya Bhushan, AdvocatesversusNANDLAL S/o Chandiram R/o II-G/25 Lajpat Nagar Delhi-24 .....Respondent Through: Ms. Priya Kumar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Deepesh Aneja and Ms. Shruti Verma, Advocates + RFA 11/2024, CM APPL. 772/2024 SANJAY DUBEY S/o RC Dubey Flat 126 Maitri Apartment, I P Extn Patpar Ganj Delhi 110092 .....Appellant Through: Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Tushar Bhushan, Mr. Yojit RFA 482/2023 & RFA 11/2024 Page1of27 Mehra and Mr. Amartya Bhushan, AdvocatesversusNANDLAL S/o Chandiram ...
Soumya Verma vs State (Nct of Delhi) & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jun-10-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL)1681/2026, CRL.M.A. 16865/2026 SOUMYA VERMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vikas Rao & Mr. Milind Modi, Advocates Petitioner through VCversusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC for the State with Mr. Sangeet Sibou, Advocate along with SI Vijaypal Singh Shubham Verma through VCCORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 10.06.20261. Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read withSection 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed to quash the FIR No. emanating therefrom.2. It is submitted that marriage of Petitioner Soumya Verma (wife) andShubham Verma (husband) was solemnized on 16.08.2021 as per Hindu Rites and Customs and out of their wedlock, one child was born. However, due to temperamental differences between Shubham Verma (Husband) and the Petitioner (wife), they started living separate...
Iti Club of India & Anr. vs Directorate General of Training
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jun-10-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ LPA 427/2026, CM APPL. 37618/2026, CM APPL. 37619/2026 ITI CLUB OF INDIA & ANR. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Ravi Chandra Prakash, Adv. (through VC)versusDIRECTORATE GENERAL OF TRAINING .....Respondent Through: Mr. Piyush Beriwal, SPC with Mr. Sarthak Rana, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAINORDER% 10.06.20261. The present Letters Patent Appeal (hereinafter, LPA) under clause Xof the Letters Patent has been filed by the Appellants against the order dated 10.04.2026 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No. 4481/2026 titled ITI Club of India & Anr. V. Directorate General of Training.2. After some submissions, the learned counsel for the Appellants seeks to withdraw the present LPA with liberty to file a review against the impugnedorder dated 10.04.2026.3. The present appeal is permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to avail remedies in accordance with law. Accordingl...
Prakash Marotrao Lonare vs Ramdas P Sandhe and Ors & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jun-10-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 1303/2026, CM APPL. 38722- 38724/2026 PRAKASH MAROTRAO LONARE .....Petitioner Through: Appearance not given.versusRAMDAS P SANDHE AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Amjad Hussain, Adv. for R-1 & 2 Mr. Nasim Anwar, Adv. for R-3.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 10.06.20261. Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filedon behalf of the Petitioner, who is Member of purported New Board of Fishcopfed, for setting aside impugned common Order dated 01.06.2026 containing the record of proceedings held on 29.05.2026 and 30.05.2026 passed by learned Sole Arbitrator, whereby Petitioners Right to address oral arguments has been closed.2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner, on query, submits that written submissions have already been filed and the matter is listed tomorrow, i.e. 11.06.2026 for clarification.3. Learned counsel for the Respondents appear on advance Notice,accept Notice an...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »