Skip to content

Delhi Court May 2026 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

May 29 2026

Savinder vs State of Delhi

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-29-2026

$~P-2* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 22.05.2026Pronounced on: 29.05.2026Uploaded on: 29.05.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 1192/2026 SAVINDER .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shivam Batra, Mr. Ram Singh, Mr. Abhishek Bhushan, Ms. Arpita and Mr. Moh. Ibrahim, Advocates.versusSTATE OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANJUDGMENT1. By way of this application under Section 483 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS], the applicant seeks regular bail in connection with FIR No. 99/2025 dated 10.12.2025, registered at Cyber Police Station, District Outer North, Delhi, under Sections2. I have heard Mr. Shivam Batra, learned counsel for the applicant,and Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor. The prosecution has also placed on record a status report dated 13.04.2026.3. Notice was issued in this application on 25.03.2026, and theInvestigating Officer was directed to inform...


May 29 2026

S and P Infrastructure Developers Pvt Ltd vs National Highways Authori ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-29-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 05.05.2026Judgment pronounced on: 29.05.2026Judgment Uploaded on: 29.05.2026+ W.P.(C) 3885/2026, CM APPL. 19062/2026, CM APPL.S AND P INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPERS PVT LTD.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Gaurav Chopra, Sr. Adv. along with Ms. Anusuya Salwan, Mr. Jatin Bansal, Mr. Divyam Suri, Mr. Afaq Sherwani, Mr. Shantanu Mishra, Mr. Jagrit Vyas and Mr. Himanshu Bindal, Advs.versusNATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain Sr. Adv.Along with Mr. Santosh Kumar, Standing Counsel, Mr. Ritik Dwivedi, Mr. Devansh Malhotra, Mr. Adithya Ramani, Mr. Nishank Tripathi, Ms. Harshita Sukhija, Ms. Rishika Agrawal and Ms. Priya Tyagi, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv. along with Mr. Sanjeev K. Kapoor, Mr. Dhritiman Roy, Ms. Sania Abbasi and Mr. Shreedhar Kale, Advs. for R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANSigning Date:29.05.2026 W.P.(C) 3885/2...


May 29 2026

Eenadu Television Private Limited vs Telecom Regulatory Authority of I ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-29-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 07.04.2026Judgment pronounced on: 29.05.2026Judgment uploaded on: 29.05.2026+ W.P.(C) 7982/2013, CM APPL. 18654/2015 and CM APPL. 9X MEDIA PVT. LTD. & ORS .....Petitioners Through:versusTELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA.....Respondent Through:+ W.P.(C) 7983/2013B4U BROADBAND (INDIA) PVT. LTD. & ORS.....Petitioners Through:versusTELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA.....Respondent Through:+ W.P.(C) 7984/2013TV VISION LIMITED & ORS.....Petitioner Through:versusTELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA.....Respondent Through:+ W.P.(C) 7985/2013 SUN TV NETWORKS LIMITED .....Petitioner Through:Signing Date:29.05.2026W.P,(C) 7982/2013 and connected matters Page 1 of 68versusTELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA.....Respondent Through:+ W.P.(C) 7987/2013 E 24 GLAMORU LIMITED .....Petitioner Through:versusTELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA.....Respondent Through:+ W.P.(C) 7988/2013 PIONEER CHANNEL FACTORY PVT. LTD...


May 29 2026

News Broadcasters Association Ors vs Union of India

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-29-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 07.04.2026Judgment pronounced on: 29.05.2026Judgment uploaded on: 29.05.2026+ W.P.(C) 7982/2013, CM APPL. 18654/2015 and CM APPL. 9X MEDIA PVT. LTD. & ORS .....Petitioners Through:versusTELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Respondent Through:+ W.P.(C) 7983/2013 B4U BROADBAND (INDIA) PVT. LTD. & ORS .....Petitioners Through:versusTELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Respondent Through:+ W.P.(C) 7984/2013 TV VISION LIMITED & ORS .....Petitioner Through:versusTELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Respondent Through:+ W.P.(C) 7985/2013 SUN TV NETWORKS LIMITED .....Petitioner Through:Signing Date:29.05.2026W.P,(C) 7982/2013 and connected matters Page 1 of 68versusTELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Respondent Through:+ W.P.(C) 7987/2013 E 24 GLAMORU LIMITED .....Petitioner Through:versusTELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Respondent Through:+ W.P.(C) 7988/2013 PIONEER CHANNEL FACTORY...


May 29 2026

Celebrities Management Pvt Ltd & Anr. vs Telecom Regulatory Authority ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-29-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 07.04.2026Judgment pronounced on: 29.05.2026Judgment uploaded on: 29.05.2026+ W.P.(C) 7982/2013, CM APPL. 18654/2015 and CM APPL. 9X MEDIA PVT. LTD. & ORS .....Petitioners Through:versusTELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA.....Respondent Through:+ W.P.(C) 7983/2013B4U BROADBAND (INDIA) PVT. LTD. & ORS.....Petitioners Through:versusTELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA.....Respondent Through:+ W.P.(C) 7984/2013TV VISION LIMITED & ORS.....Petitioner Through:versusTELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA.....Respondent Through:+ W.P.(C) 7985/2013 SUN TV NETWORKS LIMITED .....Petitioner Through:Signing Date:29.05.2026W.P,(C) 7982/2013 and connected matters Page 1 of 68versusTELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA.....Respondent Through:+ W.P.(C) 7987/2013 E 24 GLAMORU LIMITED .....Petitioner Through:versusTELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA.....Respondent Through:+ W.P.(C) 7988/2013 PIONEER CHANNEL FACTORY PVT. LTD...


May 29 2026

Ak & Anr. vs Union of India & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-29-2026

$~J* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment pronounced on: 29.05.2026 + W.P.(C) 1021/2016, CM APPL. 4449/2016 &4263/2017 LAKSH VIR SINGH YADAV .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 3918/2021, CM APPL. 19941/2021JORAWER SINGH MUNDY @ JORAWAR SINGH MUNDY.....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 6790/2021, CM APPL. 21682/2024 ASHUTOSH KAUSHIK .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 8209/2021 SHEKHAR SINGH JADAUN .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 8557/2021 JAIDEEP MIRCHANDANI & ANR. .....PetitionersversusUNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATION AND IT & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 12620/2021 MOHAMMED UMAR ASHRAFI .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH MINISTRY OF INFORMATIONAND BROADCASTING & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 11553/2021, CM APPL. 35651/2021 ATUL DIKSHIT .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA & OR...


May 29 2026

Conscient Infrastructure Pvt Ltd vs Mahesh Kapoor and Another

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-29-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIJudgment reserved on: 13.04.2026Judgment pronounced on: 29.05.2026+ O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 138/2026CONSCIENT INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD......Petitioner Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anirudh Bakhru, Mr. Divyam Agarwal, Mr. Ayush Puri, Mr. Ranvir Singh Sisodia, Mr. Kanav Madnani and Mr. Siddhant, Advocates.versusMR. MAHESH KAPOOR & ANR......Respondent Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Manu Bajaj, Ms. Parul, Mr. Krishna Gambhir, Ms. Shreya Sethi and Ms. Riya Kumar, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHANSHANKARJUDGMENTHARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J.1. The present Petition, filed by Conscient Infrastructure Pvt.Ltd.1 under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19962 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 19083, seeks certain ad interim reliefs and directions against Mr. Mahesh KapoorPetitioner A&C ActCPCDigitally Signed O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 138/202...


May 29 2026

Sameer Johry vs Union of India & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-29-2026

$~J* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment pronounced on: 29.05.2026 + W.P.(C) 1021/2016, CM APPL. 4449/2016 &4263/2017 LAKSH VIR SINGH YADAV .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 3918/2021, CM APPL. 19941/2021 JORAWER SINGH MUNDY @ JORAWAR SINGH MUNDY .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 6790/2021, CM APPL. 21682/2024 ASHUTOSH KAUSHIK .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 8209/2021 SHEKHAR SINGH JADAUN .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 8557/2021 JAIDEEP MIRCHANDANI & ANR. .....PetitionersversusUNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATION AND IT & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 12620/2021 MOHAMMED UMAR ASHRAFI .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND BROADCASTING & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 11553/2021, CM APPL. 35651/2021 ATUL DIKSHIT .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA &...


May 29 2026

Intas Pharmaceuticals Limited vs Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-29-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment Reserved on: 08.04.2026Judgment delivered on: 29.05.2026Judgment uploaded on: 30.05.2026+ RFA(OS)(COMM) 10/2026 CM APPL. 21698/2026INTAS PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED ..... AppellantversusSUN PHARMA LABORATORIES LIMITED .....RespondentAdvocates who appeared in this caseFor the Appellant : Mr. Sandeep Sethi and Mr. Amit Sibal, Sr. Advs. with Ms. Bitika Sharma, Mr Kapil Midha, Mr. George Vithayathil, Ms. Ahaana Singh Rana, Ms. Mrinalini Goyat, Mr. Aditya Prakash Mishra, Ms. Smriti Nair, Mr. Krisna Gambhir and Ms. Shreya Sethi, Advs.For the Respondent : Mr. Sachin Gupta, Mr. Rohit Pradhan, Mr. Rajat Jain, Mr. Ajay Kumar, Ms. Prashansa Singh, Ms. Mahima Chanchalani, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAJUDGMENTMANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J.Signed By:RASHMI RFA(OS)(COMM) 10/2026 Page 1 of 92INDEXSr. No. Subject Paragraph Nos.1. Factual matrix ...


May 29 2026

Suman Kumar Singh Raghav & Anr. vs Bar Council of India

Court: Delhi Orders

Decided on: May-29-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 561/2026 SUMAN KUMAR SINGH RAGHAV & ANR. .....Petitioners Through:versusBAR COUNCIL OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Preetpal Singh, Ms. Medha Sharma, Ms. Pooja, Ms. Simran Kumari and Mr. Gaurav, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 29.05.2026 The matter is taken up today as 28.05.2026 was declared a holiday on account of Id-ul-Zuha (Bakrid).1. It is submitted by learned counsel for the respondent / Bar Council ofIndia that order in B.C.I. Tr. Case No.596/2024 has been pronounced.2. In the circumstances, no further orders are required to be passed in thepresent petition.3. The same is accordingly, disposed of.4. Needless to say, the rights and remedies of the petitioner in respect ofthe aforesaid order are reserved.SACHIN DATTA, JMAY 29, 2026/clThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning th...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial