Delhi Court May 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Super Disco Ispat Pvt. Ltd. vs Ravi and Singh Communication
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 21st April, 2026 Pronounced on: 29th May, 2026+ TR.P.(C.) 54/2026 & CM APPL. 16961/2026 SUPER DISCO ISPAT PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vidit Gupta and Mr. Trivesh Sharma, Advocates.versusRAVI AND SINGH COMMUNICATION .....Respondent Through: Mr. Uttam Datt, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rishi Raj Sharma, Ms. Sonakshi Singh, Mr. Kumar Bhaskar, Mr. Naman Kumar and Mr. Subhash Chand, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMAJUDGMENTAMIT SHARMA, J.1. The present petition under Section 24 read with Section 151 of theCivil Procedure Code, 19081, seeks the following prayers: -a) Allow the present Petition and transfer the C.S.(COMM.) No. Pvt. Ltd.' pending before the Court of Ld. District Judge (Commercial Court-01), North - West District, Rohini Courts, Delhi to this Hon'ble Court to be tried and adjudicated alongwith C.S.(COMM.) No. 137/2026 titled as 'Super Disco Ispat Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Ravi and...
Govind Ballabh vs State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1121/2026 GOVIND BALLABH .....Applicant Through: Dr. Ajay Chaudhary and Ms. Nikita Chaudhary, Advs.versusSTATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Raghuinder Verma, APP for the State with Ms. Upasana Bakshi and Ms. Nikita Manish, Advocates SI Priyanka, PS.: AlipurCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 29.05.2026 CRL.M.A. 17418/2026 (For withdrawal of bail application)1. By virtue of the present application, the applicant seeks to withdrawthe present bail application being BAIL APPLN. 1121/2026.2. For the reasons stated in the therein, the present application isallowed and disposed of.BAIL APPLN. 1121/20263. In view of the order passed hereinabove, the present bail applicationis dismissed as withdrawn.4. The date of 20.07.2026 is cancelled.SAURABH BANERJEE, J.MAY 29, 2026/bhThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi...
Jaiprakash Power Ventures Ltd Jpvl vs M S Kasturi Lal Har Lal Limited ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 582/2026 JAIPRAKASH POWER VENTURES LTD JPVL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pawan R Upadhyay, Mr. Piyush Gupta, Ms. Aditi Anup, Mr. Himanshu Rao, AdvocatesversusM S KASTURI LAL HAR LAL LIMITED KLHL .....Respondent Through: Ms Ruchira Gupta, Ms Sumriddhi Agrawal, Mr Mohtisham Ali, Mr Nitender Yadav, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASADORDER% 29.05.20261. This is a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration & ConciliationAct, 1996 for appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.2. Learned Counsel for the Respondent states that the Letter of Awarddated 27.05.2024 has been issued by Jaypee Nigrie Super Thermal Power Plant, which has been described as a company. Attention of this Court has also been drawn to the notice issued under Section 21 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act wherein notice has been issued on behalf of Jaypee Nigrie Super Thermal Power Plant. ...
Dhanuka Agritech Ltd. vs Union of India Through the Secretary & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 20 February 2026 Pronounced on: 29 May 2026+ LPA 215/2023 & CM APPLs. 15489/2023 & 74892/2025 DHANUKA AGRITECH LTD. ....Appellant Through: Ms. Shoba Ramamoorthy, Mr. Ankit Virmani and Ms. Devanshi Sharma, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA THROUGHTHE SECRETARY & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vardhman Kaushik, Adv., Mr. Nishant Gautam CGSC, Ms. Kavya Shukla, Mr. Vineet Negi., Mr. Naman Sharma, Ms. Theresa, Mr. Vibhav V. Nath Advs. for UOI Mr. Arvind Nigam, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Gaurav Barathi, and Mr. Harsh Gupta, Advs. for R-4CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKARHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA% JUDGMENT29.05.2026C. HARI SHANKAR, J.A. The lis1. Consequent to a decision taken in the 349 th meeting of theRegistration Committee1 on 9 July 2014, the Directorate of Plant1 RC hereinafterKUMAR LPA 215/2023 Page 1 of 43Protection, Quarantine and Storage2 granted registration to ...
Rishab Global Industries Private Limited & Anr. vs Prrasch Enterprise ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 323/2026RISHAB GLOBAL INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR......Plaintiffs Through: Ms. Shrutika Misra and Ms. Diya Banerjee, Advocates.versusPRRASCH ENTERPRISE PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS......Defendants Through: Mr. Jayesh K. Sainik, Advocate for D-1, D-2 and D-3. Ms. Harsshita Pothiraj, Advocate forD-5.Mr. Varun Pathak, Mr. Akhil Shandilya and Ms. Nitya Nath, Advocates for D-6. Ms. Priya Goyal and Ms. Aakriti Gupta, Advocates for D-8.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELAORDER% 29.05.2026 I.A. 15760/2026 (Under Order XXIII Rule 3, CPC)1. This is a joint application filed on behalf of the parties i.e. plaintiffs andthe defendant nos.1, 2 and 3 under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as CPC).2. Learned counsel for the parties i.e. plaintiff and the defendant nos.1, 2and 3 state that the inter se disputes between the parties have been se...
Bansur Mahavidhyalaya & Anr. vs National Council for Teacher Education ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2026
$~J* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIJudgment reserved on: 07.05.2026Judgment pronounced on: 29 .05.2026+ W.P. (C) 3746/2026BANSUR MAHAVIDHYALAYA & ANR ....Petitioners Through: Mr. Trideep Pais, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sahil Ghai, Mr. Anuj Kishore Saxena, Mr. Sahil Khurana, Ms. Sakshi Jain, Ms Saloni Ambastha, Advs.versusNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR....Respondents Through: Mr. Anuj Kapoor, Mr. Shivom Sethi Mr. Nandeesh Nanda, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHJUDGMENT1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioners under Article226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following prayers: i. Declare that public notices dated 25.08.2025 and 12.09.2025, seeking institutes to apply afresh for transition, are not applicable upon the Petitioner Institute; and/orW.P. (C) 3746/2026 Page 1 of 16 ii. Direct the Respondents to decide on merit the Petitioners application dated 05.03.2024 for transition from 4-year Integrated BA/B.Sc....
Varun Puri vs Banwari Lal Saraf
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 21.05.2026Judgment delivered on: 29.05.2026+ CRL.REV.P.(NI) 89/2026 & CRL.M.A. 9342/2026 1) VARUN PURI .....PetitionerversusSHYAM KISHAN SARAF .....Respondent+ CRL.REV.P.(NI) 192/2026 & CRL.M.A. 15804/2026 & CRL.M.A. 2) RAMAN PURI .....PetitionerversusSHYAM KISHAN SARAF .....Respondent+ CRL.REV.P.(NI) 193/2026 & CRL.M.A. 15888/2026 & CRL.M.A. 3) VIKRAM PURI .....PetitionerversusSHYAM KISHAN SARAF .....RespondentAND+ CRL.REV.P.(NI) 90/2026 & CRL.M.A. 9347/2026 4) VARUN PURI .....PetitionerversusBANWARI LAL SARAF .....Respondent+ CRL.REV.P.(NI) 189/2026 & CRL.M.A. 15622/2026 & CRL.M.A. 5) VIKRAM PURI .....PetitionerversusBANWARI LAL SARAF .....Respondent+ CRL.REV.P.(NI) 191/2026 & CRL.M.A. 15732/2026 & CRL.M.A.Signature Not Verified CRL. REV. P. (NI) 89/2026 & Page 1 of 206) RAMAN PURI .....PetitionerversusBANWARI LAL SARAF .....RespondentMemo of Appearance For the Petitioner...
Venktesh Daswani vs National Board of Examination in Medical Sciences ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2026
$~J* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIJudgment reserved on: 13.05.2026Judgment pronounced on: 29 .05.2026+ W.P.(C) 5824/2026 & CM APPL. 30162/2026 DR AMAN CHOUDHARY Petitioner Through: Ms. Tanvi Dubey & Mr. Yash Dubey, Advs.versusNATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATION IN MEDICALSCIENCES Respondent Through: Ms. Ruchira Gupta and Ms. Sumriddhi Agrawal, Advs.+ W.P.(C) 4491/2026 & CM APPL. 21859/2026 VENKTESH DASWANI Petitioner Through: Dr. Alakh Alok Srivastava and Mr. Arpit Dangi, Advs.versusNATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATION IN MEDICALSCIENCES AND OTHERS Respondents Through: Ms. Ruchira Gupta and Ms. Sumriddhi Agrawal, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Sandeep Kumar Mahapatra, CGSC with Ms. Mrinmayee Sahu, Mr. Tribhuvan and Ms. Anushka Sarraf, Advs. for R-3. Mr. Deepansh Sharma, GP for R-3. Ms. Tanvi Dubey, Adv. for R-8.Digitally Signed W.P.(C) 5824/2026 & W.P.(C) 4491/2026 Page 1 of 31CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHJUDGMENTW.P.(C) 4491/20261. This is a writ petition filed...
Ashok Kumar Singh vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2026
$~J* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment pronounced on: 29.05.2026 + W.P.(C) 1021/2016, CM APPL. 4449/2016 &4263/2017 LAKSH VIR SINGH YADAV .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 3918/2021, CM APPL. 19941/2021JORAWER SINGH MUNDY @ JORAWAR SINGH MUNDY.....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 6790/2021, CM APPL. 21682/2024 ASHUTOSH KAUSHIK .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 8209/2021 SHEKHAR SINGH JADAUN .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 8557/2021 JAIDEEP MIRCHANDANI & ANR. .....PetitionersversusUNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATION AND IT & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 12620/2021 MOHAMMED UMAR ASHRAFI .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH MINISTRY OF INFORMATIONAND BROADCASTING & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 11553/2021, CM APPL. 35651/2021 ATUL DIKSHIT .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA & OR...
Mr. Gajendra Mishra vs Pokhrama Foundation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 273/2026 & I.A. 8231/2026 MR. GAJENDRA MISHRA .....Petitioner Through:versusPOKHRAMA FOUNDATION .....Respondent Through: Mr. Pareesh Virmani, AdvocateCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASADORDER% 29.05.2026 Since 28.05.2026 was declared as a holiday on account of Id-ul-Zuha, these matters are being heard today, i.e. 29.05.2026.THIS MATTER HAS BEEN RECEIVED ON TRANSFER1. The present Petition under Section 29A(4) & (5) of the Arbitrationand Conciliation Act, 1996 has been filed by the Petitioner for extending the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal.2. Material on record indicates that an Arbitral Tribunal was constitutedby this Court vide Order dated 10.04.2024 in ARB.P.969/2023. Since the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal has expired on 26.12.2025, the present Petition has been filed for extending the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal.3. It is stated that final arguments have been h...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »