Delhi Court May 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Lovee Narula vs Directorate of Enforcement
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 4935/2025 LOVEE NARULA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Arup Sinha, Advocate.versusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAORDER% 18.05.2026 CRL.M.A. 15825/2026 (modification of order dt. 04.05.2026)1. In view of nature of this application, no notice is required to beissued. The applicant Lovee Narula seeks modification of order dated 04.05.2026 to the limited extent of marking presence of learned senior counsel Mr. Sandeep Sharma, who had appeared on his behalf and had addressed arguments.2. I categorically remember and even record reflects that Mr. SandeepSharma, Senior Advocate had appeared and addressed arguments on behalf of the applicant. Even my rough notes bear his name. Apparently, since on the day of closure of arguments, Mr. Sharma, Senior Advocate could not appear, his name is not reflected in the final order dated 04.05.2026.3. Therefore, the applicati...
Ht Media Pvt. Ltd. vs Gnct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THEHIGH COURTOF DELHIAT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5473/2018 HT MEDIA PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner Through:Ms. Raavi Birbal, Advocate with Mr.Arun Pathak, AGM legalversusGNCT OF DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through:Mr. Anubhav Gupta, Panel Counsel for GNCTD with Mr. Kartik Sharma,Advocates Mr.Sudhir Kumar Sharma and Mr.Utkarsh Kumar, Advocates for respondent No.2CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIORDER% 04.05.2026 CM APPL. 29392/2026 (joint application for disposal of the petition in terms of settlement between the parties before Mediation)1. By way of present joint application filed on behalf of the parties, theCourt is informed that the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement videMediation Settlement dated 09.04.2026, before Delhi Mediation Centre, Rouse Avenue District Courts, NewDelhi.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that,in compliance of theaforesaid Settlement Agreement, a cheque bearing No.801706 dated 14.04.2026for a sum of Rs.5,00,000/-, drawn on...
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi vs Janak Raj Gupta and Co.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 360/2026 CM APPL. 29433/2026-DELAY OF 638 DAYS IN RE-FILING PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI .....Appellant Through: Mr. Gaurav Gupta, SSC, Mr. Shivendra Singh and Mr. Yojit Pareek, JSCs and Mr. Surya Jindal, Adv.versusJANAK RAJ GUPTA AND CO. .....Respondent Through: Appearance not givenCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARORDER% 04.05.20261. Learned counsel for appellant submitted that the tax effect in the instant appeal falls below the limit prescribed in CBDT Circular No.5/2024 dated 15.03.2024 read with Circular No. 9/2024 dated 17.09.2024.2. In view of the aforesaid, the appeal is dismissed. DINESH MEHTA, J VINOD KUMAR, J MAY 4, 2026/ssThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/05/2026 at 12:35:32...
M/S Nutech Contracts Pvt. Ltd. vs M/S China Construction Sausum (India ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 2138/2025 M/S NUTECH CONTRACTS PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Singh Chhikara and Mr. Ashwani Kumar, AdvocatesversusM/S CHINA CONSTRUCTION SAUSUM (INDIA) PVT. LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rohit Shubham, AdvocateCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHANSHANKARORDER% 04.05.20261. The present Petition, under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeks the constitution of an Arbitral Tribunal for settlement of disputes inter se the parties.2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions, seeks the leave of this Court to withdraw the present Petition, in view of the fact that the disputes inter se the parties stand settled.3. Leave, as sought for, is granted.4. Accordingly, the present Petition, along with pending Application(s), if any, is dismissed as withdrawn.HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J.MAY 04, 2026/rk/dj This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be...
Ujjawal Bhardwaj & Anr. vs State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDecided on: 04.05.2026 + CRL.M.C. 9293/2025 UJJAWAL BHARDWAJ & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Shinmila Ngasainao, Advocate.versusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State. SI Sanjay K., PS Hauz Khas.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN PRATEEK JALAN, J. (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 13766/2026 (Exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CRL.M.A. 13765/2026 (early hearing) By way of this application, the petitioner seeks early hearing of the captioned petition. For the reasons stated therein, the application is allowed, and the petition is taken up for hearing. The application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 9293/20251. By way of the present petition, the petitioner assails an orderpassed by the learned Sessions Court in proceedings arising out of FIR No. 404/2022 dated 18.10.2022, registered at Police Station Hauz Khas under Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) a...
M/S Richa Construction Co. vs M/S N.B.C.C. (I) Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
$~82 & 83* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of decision: 04.05.2026 + O.M.P. (COMM) 481/2018 M/S RICHA CONSTRUCTION CO. .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Madhumita Bhattacharjee & Mr. Keshav Bansal, Advs.versusM/S N.B.C.C. (I) LTD. .....Respondent Through: Ms. Kanika Singh, Adv. + O.M.P. (COMM) 355/2019 NBCC INDIA LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Kanika Singh, Adv.versusRICHA CONSTRUCTION LTD. .....Respondent Through: Ms. Madhumita Bhattacharjee & Mr. Keshav Bansal, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANAVNEESH JHINGAN, J. (ORAL)1. These two petitions are filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short the Act) against the award dated 28.06.2018.2. The brief facts are that the Naval Dockyard, Mumbai awarded acontract for construction of technical buildings for central machine shop at Naval Dockyard, Mumbai to the respondent/ National Building Construction Corporation Limited (for short NBCC) for an Signed By:HONEY O...
Indrani & Ors. vs Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on : 23.04.2026Pronounced on : 04.05.2026Uploaded on : 04.05.2026 + FAO 5/2026 INDRANI & ORS. .....Appellant Through: Mr. Rajan Sood, AdvocateversusUNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Ms. Avshreya Pratap Singh Rudy, CGSC for UOI with Ms. Usha Jamnal, Ms. Nyasa Sharma and Mr. Ankit Khatri, AdvocatesCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIJUDGMENT1. The present appeal has been filed under Section 23 of the RailwayClaims Tribunal Act, 1987 against the impugned judgment dated 28.07.2025 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Principal Bench, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) in Claim Application No. OA II(u) No.2. The brief facts of the case, as stated in the claim application are thaton 08.03.2024, one Sh. Shukru (hereinafter referred to as the deceased), along with his wife, had boarded Train no. 12427 (Reva Express) from Manikpur Junction for travelling to Anand Vihar Terminal, on the strength of a...
Central Council for Research in Unani Medicine vs Dr. Mohd. Fazil and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 10475/2018 CENTRAL COUNCIL FOR RESEARCH IN UNANI MEDICINE .....Petitioner Through: Mr. S. Sunil and Mr. Moksh Arora, Advs.versusDR. MOHD. FAZIL AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rahul Kumar, Adv. for R-1.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARORDER% 04.05.20261. Mr. Rahul Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent at the outsetpointed out that the issue involved in the present writ petition is covered against the petitioner council by a decision of this Court in the case of Writ Petition No.1691/2024 titled as Union of India through Secretary and Another v. Late Dr. Nusrat Hameed Khan through LRs Mrs Zeenat Hameed Khan and Ors., NC: 2024:DHC:877-DB on 06.02.2024.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner at this stage submitted that againstthe aforesaid judgment of the Delhi High Court, the Union of India has preferred an SLP (Diary No. 59188/2024), wherein Honble the Supreme Court, while ...
Mohd. Wahid & Ors. vs State of Nct Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 04th May, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 475/2026 & CRL.M.A. 1916/2026 & CRL.M.A. 1917/2026 MOHD. WAHID & ORS. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sayma Feroz, Advocate alongwith petitioners in person.versusSTATE OF NCT DELHI & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP for the State with ASI Rajiv. Mr. Arman Khan, Ms. Ananay Lamba, Mr. Lokesh Yadav, Advocates for R-2 alongwith respondent No.2 in person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINJ U D G M E N T (oral)1. Petitioners herein seek quashing of FIR No. 0311/2025 dated proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.2. Petitioner No.3 herein got married to respondent No.2 on 31.12.2023, as per Muslim customs and rites.3. There is no child from the abovesaid wedlock.4. On account of some temperamental differences and incompatibilities,the parties started residing separately and when a report was made to the Signed B...
Sheela Devi vs Ravi Kumar Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 04.05.2026 + CONT.CAS(C) 124/2026, CM APPL. 29747/2026 SHEELA DEVI ....Petitioner Through: Dr. L.S. Chaudhary, Dr. Ajay Chaudhary, Mr. Bharat Chaudhary, Ms. Vinita, Ms. Monika, Ms. Nikita Chaudhary, Mr. Parambir Singh, Advs. Mr. Jai Sahai Endlaw, Ms. Shambhavi Kala, Advs. for Applicant.versusRAVI KUMAR SINGH .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sandeep Tyagi (SPC) for R1.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTASACHIN DATTA, J. (ORAL)1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking initiationof contempt proceedings against the respondent no. 1 for alleged willful disobedience of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Lalita Kumari v. Govt. of U.P. & Ors., (2014) 2 SCC 1. The relevant portion of thejudgment is reproduced as under 119. . But, if the information given clearly mentions the commission of a cognizable offence, there is no other option but to register an FIR forthwith. Other considerations are ...
- ‹ Prev
- 453
- 454
- 455
- 456
- 457
- 458
- 459
- 460
- 462
- 463
- Next ›
- Last »