Delhi Court May 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -4 vs Kross Diamonds Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
$~31, 32, 33 & 34* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 675/2025 + ITA 676/2025 + ITA 677/2025 + ITA 678/2025 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -4 .....Appellant Through: Mr. Gaurav Gupta, SSC with Mr. Shivendra Singh, JSC, Mr. Yojit Pareek, JSC and Mr. Surya Jindal, Advs.versusKROSS DIAMONDS PVT. LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. M P.Rastogi, Ms. Kaushik, Mr. Ram Naresh, Mr. Deepak Malik and Mr. Shivam Malik, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARORDER% 04.05.20261. All these appeals involve common facts and propose identicalquestions of law, for which we are deciding them by a common order. For the purpose of clarity and convenience, facts of ITA No. 675/2025 are however, being taken into consideration.2. The respondent/assessee deals in diamonds, which he imports fromvarious countries in accordance with the provision of Customs Act, 1962 and other relevant law. During the course of assessment proceedings, the Assessing O...
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -4 vs Kross Diamonds Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
$~31, 32, 33 & 34* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 675/2025 + ITA 676/2025 + ITA 677/2025 + ITA 678/2025 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -4 .....Appellant Through: Mr. Gaurav Gupta, SSC with Mr. Shivendra Singh, JSC, Mr. Yojit Pareek, JSC and Mr. Surya Jindal, Advs.versusKROSS DIAMONDS PVT. LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. M P.Rastogi, Ms. Kaushik, Mr. Ram Naresh, Mr. Deepak Malik and Mr. Shivam Malik, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARORDER% 04.05.20261. All these appeals involve common facts and propose identicalquestions of law, for which we are deciding them by a common order. For the purpose of clarity and convenience, facts of ITA No. 675/2025 are however, being taken into consideration.2. The respondent/assessee deals in diamonds, which he imports fromvarious countries in accordance with the provision of Customs Act, 1962 and other relevant law. During the course of assessment proceedings, the Assessing O...
Ganesh Kumar Mahto vs State Through S.H.0 of P.S Moti Nagar Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 27.04.2026Judgment pronounced on: 04.05.2026+ CRL.A. 1484/2025 AMAR UGARSEN BHARADWAJ .....Appellant Through: Mr. Amit Rao, Advocate with Ms. Siya Yadav and Mr. Hasan Ali, AdvocatesversusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Utkarsh, APP for State with Inspector Mukesh and SI Jitender Singh + CRL.A. 1491/2025 UMA SHANKAR YADAV .....Appellant Through: Mr. Siddharth Satija, Advocate (DHCLSC) with Mr. Akash Sachan, AdvocateversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Utkarsh, APP for State with Inspector Mukesh and SI Jitender Singh CRL.A. 1484/2025, CRL.A. 1491/2025 & CRL.A. 1612/2025 Page 1 of 58 + CRL.A. 1612/2025 GANESH KUMAR MAHTO .....Appellant Through: Mr. Amit Rao, Advocate with Ms. Siya Yadav and Mr. Hasan Ali, AdvocatesversusSTATE THROUGH S.H.O. OF P.S. MOTI NAGAR DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Utkarsh, APP for State with Inspector Mukesh and SI Jitender SinghCORAM:HON...
Pravez Khan vs Directorate of Enforcement
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 23.04.2026Judgment pronounced on: 04.05.2026+ BAIL APPLN. 4618/2024, CRL.M.A. 37776/2024, CRL.M.(BAIL) PRAVEZ KHAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Madhav Khurana, Sr. Advocate Mr. Rohan Wadhwa, Mr. Arun Kanwa, Mr. Amit Badsera, Mr. Sagar Suri, Mr. Vittal B., Mr. Varun Rawat, Mr. Lakshay Sahrawat and Mr. Alok Kumar, Advocates.versusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT .....Respondent Through: Mr. Arkaj Kumar, Standing Counsel with Mr. Aakarsh Mishra, Mr. Karsh Sarosh Rebelo and Ms. Bhavna Gandhi, Advocates. IO/Assistant Director Parveen Yadav in person. + BAIL APPLN. 4787/2024 NEERAJ CHAUHAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankit Verma, Mr. Arvind Mishra, Mr. Ved Prakash Verma, Mr. D. Kumar and Mr. Sachin Verma, Advocates.versusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT .....Respondent Through: Mr. Arkaj Kumar, Standing Counsel with Mr. Aakarsh Mishra, Mr. Karsh Sarosh Rebelo and Ms. Bhavna Bail Applications 4618/2024 & connected matters Page 1 ...
Payoneer Inc. vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax International Taxat ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 17838/2025 & CM APPL. 73655/2025 PAYONEER INC. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Salil Kapoor, Mr. Sumit Lalchandani & Mr. Kunal S Savani, Advocates.versusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION CIRCLE (2) (2) (2) DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Abhishek Maratha, SSC with Mr. Apoorv Agarwal, Mr. Viplav Acharya, JSCs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARORDER% 04.05.20261. Informing that petitioners return income has been accepted and theorder in this regard has been passed, Mr. Sumit Lalchandani, learnedcounsel for the petitioner, does not press the present writ petition.2. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed as withdrawn.3. The pending application is also disposed of accordingly.DINESH MEHTA, J.VINOD KUMAR, J.MAY 4, 2026/nk This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by s...
M/S Ltc Commercial Company Private Limited vs Small Farmers Agribusine ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 15/2026 M/S LTC COMMERCIAL COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rishabh Kapoor, Mr. Jatin Gulia, Mr. Siddharth Rana, Mr. Kunal Malik, Mr. Sourav Drall, Mr. Lokesh Yadav and Mr. Vivek Shekhawat, Advs.versusSMALL FARMERS AGRIBUSINESS CONSORTIUM, HARYANA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shekhar Raj Sharma, Addl. AG, (Haryana) with Ms. Nidhi Narwal and Ms. Srishti Jain, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJANORDER% 04.05.2026 I.A. 31/2026 (seeking condonation of delay in re-filing the petition under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963 r/w Order VIII Rule 1 CPC by petitioner)1. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay in re-filing the present petition is condoned.2. The application stands disposed of. ARB.P. 15/20263. The present petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter, the Act) seeking appointment ofan Arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute b...
Satnam Kaur Bedi vs the Govt of Nct Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 18596/2025 & CM APPL. 77310/2025 SATNAM KAUR BEDI .....Petitioner Through: None.versusTHE GOVT OF NCT DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Vaishali Gupta, Panel Counsel (Civil) GNCTD, Mr. Siddharth Arora, Advocates for R-1. Ms Shehnaz Ali, Adv. for R-2.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 04.05.20261. None has appeared for the petitioner despite the matter being called out in second round.2. Petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J MAY 4, 2026/PThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/05/2026 at 13:06:43...
House of Diagnostics Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. vs Paritosh Jain
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA(COMM) 688/2025 & CM APPL. 77514/2025 HOUSE OF DIAGNOSTICS HEALTHCARE PVT. LTD. .....Appellant Through: Mr. Harsh Jain, Adv. along with Mr. Sanjay Tyagi, ARversusPARITOSH JAIN .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yogesh Swaroop, Ms. Babita, Ms. Shivangi Singh, Advs.CORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAINORDER% 04.05.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present appeal has been filed by the Appellant under Section 96of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 read with Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, inter alia, challenging the impugned final judgment and decree dated 5th June, 2025, passed by the ld. District Judge, Commercial Court-01, Shahdara, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in CS (Comm) No. 424/2024 titled Paritosh Jain v. M/s House of Diagnostics Healthcare Pvt. Ltd..3. Vide the impugned judgment and decree, the commercial suit forrecovery has been decreed in the following terms:- 35. In these ci...
Lovee Narula vs Directorate of Enforcement
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 23.04.2026Judgment pronounced on: 04.05.2026+ BAIL APPLN. 4618/2024, CRL.M.A. 37776/2024, CRL.M.(BAIL) PRAVEZ KHAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Madhav Khurana, Sr. Advocate Mr. Rohan Wadhwa, Mr. Arun Kanwa, Mr. Amit Badsera, Mr. Sagar Suri, Mr. Vittal B., Mr. Varun Rawat, Mr. Lakshay Sahrawat and Mr. Alok Kumar, Advocates.versusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT .....Respondent Through: Mr. Arkaj Kumar, Standing Counsel with Mr. Aakarsh Mishra, Mr. Karsh Sarosh Rebelo and Ms. Bhavna Gandhi, Advocates. IO/Assistant Director Parveen Yadav in person. + BAIL APPLN. 4787/2024 NEERAJ CHAUHAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankit Verma, Mr. Arvind Mishra, Mr. Ved Prakash Verma, Mr. D. Kumar and Mr. Sachin Verma, Advocates.versusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT .....Respondent Through: Mr. Arkaj Kumar, Standing Counsel with Mr. Aakarsh Mishra, Mr. Karsh Sarosh Rebelo and Ms. Bhavna Bail Applications 4618/2024 & connected matters Page 1 ...
Arun Kumar vs Paramesh Sivamani & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 04.05.2026 + CONT.CAS(C) 1926/2025 ARUN KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Raj Singh Phogat, Adv. (through v/c)versusPARAMESHSIVAMANI& ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Jagdish Chandra, Ms. Aishwarya Sinha and Ms. Maanya Saxena, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTASACHIN DATTA, J. (ORAL) CM APPL.29528/2026 (filed on behalf of respondents seeking recalling / modification of order dated 23.02.2026)1. It is pointed by way of this application that the judgment dated11.11.2025, passed by this court in W.P.(C) 5080/2024 & connected matters (of which contempt is alleged in the present proceedings), has been stayed by the Supreme Court vide order dated 12.03.2026 in SLP (C) No. 1. Issue notice, returnable in six weeks.2. Notice on behalf of the respondent has been accepted by Mr. Devendra Kumar Shukla, Advocate-on-Record.3. In the meantime, the effect and operation of the impugnedorder shall remain stayed.2. T...
- ‹ Prev
- 453
- 454
- 455
- 456
- 457
- 458
- 459
- 461
- 462
- 463
- Next ›
- Last »