Delhi Court May 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Independent Schools Federation of India (Regd.) and Anr. vs the Union ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5248/2019 INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS FEDERATION OF INDIA (REGD.) AND ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ravi Prakash Gupta, Adv. (M: 9871467663)versusTHE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Manisha Singh, Adv. for CBSE.CORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAINORDER% 04.05.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner- IndependentSchools Federation of India (Regd.) under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, through its National President, Mr. G.P. Gupta. 3. The Petitioner- Society is a registered association of private educational Societies, running unaided private schools.3. The petition has been filed inter alia, assailing the rules contained in Chapter 8 of the new CBSE Affiliation Bye-laws, 2018 upon self-financed unaided private schools affiliated to CBSE.4. The specific challenge is in respect of Regulation 7.2, 7.5.1, 7.5.2, 7.6 of C...
Yogender Chandolia vs Vishesh Ravi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ EL.PET. 10/2020 & I.A. 8728/2020, I.A. 11988/2020 YOGENDER CHANDOLIA .....Petitioner Through: Mr Arvind Kumar Gupta, Mr. C. Prakash, Mr Abhiesumat Gupta, Ms. Anushree Rawat and Mr Ashish Singh, Advocates.versusVISHESH RAVI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rishikesh Kumar and Ms. Sheenu Priya, Advocates. Ms. Rohini Prasad, Ms. Ashika Ranjan, Ms. Samridhi Srivastava, Advs. for R-11CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASADORDER% 04.05.20261. The present Petition under Section 80 read with Section 100(1)(b) &(d) of Representation of People Act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as RPAct), has been filed by the Petitioner seeking a declaration of the election of Returned Candidate / Respondent No.1 from the Assembly Constituency23, Karol Bagh (hereinafter referred to as AC-23), for the General Election, held in 2020 to the Legislative Assembly of NCT ofDelhi, as null and void on the ground of false and mis-representative...
Arun Kumar Sharma vs Lawyers Chambers Allotment Committee & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 8944/2022 & CM APPL. 26910/2022 ARUN KUMAR SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohit Gupta, Mr. Chandan Malik, Mr. Ankit Aggarwal and Mr. Tarun Kaushik, Advocates with petitioner in person.versusLAWYERS CHAMBERS ALLOTMENT COMMITTEE & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Avni Singh, Adv.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 04.05.20261. On instructions, Mr. Avni Singh, learned counsel appearing for therespondents submits that the matter be remitted back to respondent no.1- Lawyers Chambers Allotment Committee [LCAC], as the LCAC is open to reconsider in accordance with law.2. In view of the aforesaid, this petition stands disposed of with direction to LCAC to reconsider the petitioners case in accordance with law, afteraffording the opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The impugned orderis, therefore, set aside, which was stayed by the Court on 01.06.2022.3. Let the reconsideration be done within fou...
Bhupendra Singh & Ors. vs Mr Bhupendra Singh Bhalla & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 832/2022 BHUPENDRA SINGH & ORS. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Bhola Dagar, Adv.versusMR BHUPENDRA SINGH BHALLA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Jitendra Kumar Tripathi (ASC)CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 04.05.20261. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no instructions have been received from the petitioner in the present matter. As such, he is unable to address arguments.2. In the circumstances, the present petition stands dismissed-in-default for non-prosecution. SACHIN DATTA, J MAY 4, 2026/at/slThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/05/2026 at 11:59:48...
State of Nct of Delhi vs Deepak
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.A. 236/2021 STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Appellant Through: Mr. Aman Usman, APP with Mr. Manvendra Yadav, Adv. and SI Sandeep Bishnoi, PS Mayapuri.versusDEEPAK .....Respondent Through: Mr. Dinesh Malik, Adv. along with respondent in person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJAORDER% 07.05.20261. Nominal roll is filed which is taken on record.2. The learned counsel for the respondent prays that in view of thefact that the respondent has already undergone imprisonment of more than 5 years and 7 months, he be now extended the benefit of Probation of Offenders Act, 1958.3. Without expressing any opinion on the same, the respondent is granted liberty to move appropriate application in this regard.4. In the mean time, as we have convicted the respondent foroffences under Section 363/366/342 IPC and Section 6 of POCSO Act, let a report be called from the Delhi State Legal Services Authority (DSL...
Nbcc India Ltd. vs Richa Construction Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
$~82 & 83* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of decision: 04.05.2026 + O.M.P. (COMM) 481/2018 M/S RICHA CONSTRUCTION CO. .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Madhumita Bhattacharjee & Mr. Keshav Bansal, Advs.versusM/S N.B.C.C. (I) LTD. .....Respondent Through: Ms. Kanika Singh, Adv. + O.M.P. (COMM) 355/2019 NBCC INDIA LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Kanika Singh, Adv.versusRICHA CONSTRUCTION LTD. .....Respondent Through: Ms. Madhumita Bhattacharjee & Mr. Keshav Bansal, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANAVNEESH JHINGAN, J. (ORAL)1. These two petitions are filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short the Act) against the award dated 28.06.2018.2. The brief facts are that the Naval Dockyard, Mumbai awarded acontract for construction of technical buildings for central machine shop at Naval Dockyard, Mumbai to the respondent/ National Building Construction Corporation Limited (for short NBCC) for an Signed By:HONEY O...
Commissioner of Income Tax vs Rural Electrification Corp Ltd
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
$~82 to 85* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 1393/2010 + ITA 1397/2010 + ITA 1401/2010 + ITA 1402/2010 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX .....Appellant Through: Mr. Gaurav Gupta, SSC, Mr. Shivendra Singh and Mr. Yojit Pareek, JSCs and Mr. Surya Jindal, Adv.versusRURAL ELECTRIFICATION CORP LTD .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mayank Nagi, Mrs. Husnal Syali Nagi and Mr. Tarun Singh, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARORDER% 04.05.2026 CM APPL. 29496/2026 (EARLY HEARING) in ITA 1393/2010 CM APPL. 29494/2026-EARLY HEARING in ITA 1397/2010 CM APPL. 29493/2026-EARLY HEARING in ITA 1401/2010 CM APPL. 29495/2026-EARLY HEARING in ITA 1402/20101. Present applications have been filed by the respondent-assessee inter alia stating that the respondent has applied for settlement of the dispute under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 (DTVSV).2. Learned counsel for the respondent submitted that since the disputehas been settled and th...
Zubair Ahmed Proprietor of M/S Alpha Bioceuticals vs Musheer Ahmed Pro ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 385/2024 ZUBAIR AHMED PROPRIETOR OF M/S ALPHA BIOCEUTICALS .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Amit Gupta, Advocate.versusMUSHEER AHMED PROPRIETOR OF M/S LUCKNOW MEDICINE COMPANY .....Defendant Through: Mr. Deepak Rikhari, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJANORDER% 04.05.20261. The present suit has been filed by the plaintiff praying for a money decree in the sum of Rs.2,95,00,958/- along with interest.2. During pendency of the present suit, parties were referred tomediation vide order dated 16.12.2025, where the parties have arrived at a settlement, terms whereof have been reduced in writing in the form of settlement agreement dated 19.01.2026.3. The settlement agreement dated 19.01.2026 has been received from the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre (SAMADHAN), and is on record. The said settlement agreement has been signed by both the parties.4. Learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties affirm th...
Delhi Development Authority vs Krishan Kant Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 8896/2025 & CM APPL. 38022/2025 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vaibhav Agnihotri, ASC DDA with Ms. Suruchi Khandelwal, Adv.versusKRISHAN KANT SHARMA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Abhishek Kumar and Mr. Birpal Singh, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKARHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLAJUDGMENT (ORAL)% 04.05.2026C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. This writ petition is directed against order dated 6 October 2022 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal1 in OA 4583/2018 and 21 April 2025 in CP 106/2023.2. We may note, at the outset, that, though the order dated 21April 2025 in CP 106/2023 renotified the contempt petition for 3 July 2025, subsequently, the Tribunal has disposed of the contempt petition in view of the pendency of this writ petition.3. OA 4583/2018, preferred by the respondent before the Tribunal, sought release of the respondents retiral benefits, including pension, GPF and gra...
M/S Pachouli Aesthetic and Wellness Pvt Ltd vs 3A Wellness and Hospita ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 741/2025 M/S PACHOULI AESTHETIC AND WELLNESS PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Jessica V, Adv.versus3A WELLNESS AND HOSPITALITY .....Respondent Through: Ms. Jia Kapur, Mr. Manoj Gaud and Ms. Romsha Goel, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 04.05.20261. In view of the settlement arrived between the parties in Mediation Centre, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition.2. The settlement be taken on record.3. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. AVNEESH JHINGAN, J MAY 4, 2026/PaThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/05/2026 at 11:35:02...
- ‹ Prev
- 446
- 447
- 448
- 449
- 450
- 452
- 453
- 454
- 455
- 456
- Next ›
- Last »