Delhi Court May 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sunsure Energy Private Limited vs Vikram Solar Limited & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of Decision : 04.05.2026 + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 187/2026 & I.A. 12149/2026 (EX.) SUNSURE ENERGY PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajshekhar Rao, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Dinesh Pardasani, Ms. Ekta Tyagi, Mr. Siddarth Mehra, Mr. Parag Kabra, Mr. Amrit Singh and Mr. Vasav Anantharaman, Advocates.versusVIKRAM SOLAR LIMITED & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan and Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, Senior Advocates along with Mr. Rahul Narayan, Mr. Mehul Parti, Mr. Ashwani Malhotra, Ms. Zoya Junaid, Mr. Gyanendra Singh, Mr. Ishaan K. Sharma and Ms. Radhika, Advocates for Respondent No. 1.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHANSHANKAR % JUDGEMENT (ORAL)1. The present Petition has been filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19961 seeking the following reliefs: (a) Pass an interim order restraining Respondent No. 2 from Act Signing Date:05.05.2026 Page 1 of 6honouring, negotiating...
Tarun Singh vs the State Govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
$~78, 79 & 62* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 4th May, 2026. Uploaded on: 6th May, 2026 + CRL.A. 448/2026& CRL.M.A. 13816/2026 TARUN SINGH .....Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjiv Kumar and Mr. Dheeraj Jagwani, Advs.versusTHE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ritesh Kumar Bahri, APP with Mr. Lalit Luthra and Ms. Divya Yadav, Advs. for State. SI Mukul, P.S. Keshav Puram. Mr. Pritish Sabharwal, Mr. Sanjeet Kumar, Ms. Shweta Singh & Mr. Shiv Chopra, Advs. 79 WITH + CRL.A. 449/2026& CRL.M.A. 13827/2026 TARUN SINGH .....Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjiv Kumar and Mr. Dheeraj Jagwani, Advs.versusSTATE AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ritesh Kumar Bahri, APP with Mr. Lalit Luthra and Ms. Divya Yadav, Advs. for State. SI Mukul, P.S. Keshav Puram. Mr. Pritish Sabharwal, Mr. Sanjeet Kumar, Ms. Shweta Singh & Mr. Shiv Chopra, Advs. 62 AND + CRL.A. 445/2026& CRL.M.A. 13657/2026 TARUN SINGH .....Appellant Digitally S...
Shivpuri Buildtech Pvt Ltd and Ors vs State Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 04th May, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 3418/2026&CRL.M.A. 13824/2026 SHIVPURI BUILDTECH PVT LTD AND ORS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sumit Kumar, Mr. Harsh Kirar, Advocates along with petitioners in person.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP with SI Harvinder Singh. Mr. Danish Khan, Advocate for Respondent along with respondents.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINJ U D G M E N T (oral)1. Petitioners herein seek quashing of FIR No. 100/2024 dated proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.2. The FIR in question was registered on the basis of joint complaint made by Mr. Kiran Kapoor and Ms. Babli Kapoor.3. They were joint owners of property in question, situated at New RohtakRoad, Karol Bagh, New Delhi and the accused persons approached them and claimed that they were renowned builders and, based on their assurance, a collaboratio...
Mukta Purohit vs State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3413/2026, CRL.M.A. 13780/2026, CRL.M.A. MUKTA PUROHIT .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajat Bhardwaj and Mr. Tushar Garg, Advs.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP with Ms. Upasna Bakshi, Mr. Dinesh Kumar, and Ms. Divya Bakshi, Advocates SI Rahul Lamba, PS.: Saket, DelhiCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 04.05.20261. By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner/ complainant seeks setting aside of the order dated 13.04.2026 (impugned order) passed by the learned ASJ, South District, Saket Courts, New Delhi (learned Sessions Court) in Bail Application No.669/2026 whereby interim bail has been granted to the respondent no.2/ accused for a period of three months.2. Learned counsel for the complainant primarily submits that thoughthe bail granted to the accused vide order dated 13.06.2023 passed b...
Nuclear Medicine Physicists Association of India & Ors. vs Union of In ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6064/2026, CM APPL. 29856/2026 NUCLEAR MEDICINE PHYSICISTS ASSOCIATION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Mayank Sharma, Advocate.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shashank Dixit, CGSC with Mr. Kunal Raj, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAORDER% 04.05.20261. Mr. Mayank Sharma, counsel for the Petitioner, at the outset, withoutaddressing submissions on merits, submits that inadvertently certain material particulars have not been incorporated in the petition. He, therefore, seeks leave to withdraw the petition with a liberty to file a petition afresh on the same cause of action. Leave and liberty, as prayed for, are granted.2. The petition is disposed of along with pending application(s), if any. SANJEEV NARULA, J MAY 4, 2026 nkThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code ...
Sirajuddin & Anr. vs State (N.C.T. of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.REV.P. 278/2026 & CRL.M.A. 13632/2026 SIRAJUDDIN & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Pankaj Kapoor, Advocate.versusSTATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP with Inspector Bineet Kumar Pandey and SI Rahul, PS Tilok Nagar.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAORDER% 04.05.20261. After addressing partly, learned counsel for revisionist seeks permission to withdraw this revision petition, which had been filed against framing of charge.2. Accordingly, the petition and the accompanying application are dismissed as withdrawn. GIRISH KATHPALIA, J MAY 4, 2026/drThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/05/2026 at 11:48:06...
Shabira Alish Sabina vs the State of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
$~107-Q* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3389/2026, CRL.M.As. 13682-13683/2026 SHABIRA ALISH SABINA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Praveen Yadav, Mr. Chemendra Kaushik, Advocates.versusTHE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP with SI Shivam. Mr. Sanjeet Trivedi, Advocate for R2.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 04.05.20261. The petitioner has filed this petition under Section 528 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS] (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC]) seeking quashing of FIR No. 264/2022 dated 23.05.2022, registered at Police Station Seelampur, District North-East, Delhi, under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003, alongwith all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom, on the ground of settlement.2. Issue notice. Mr. Hitesh Vali, learned Additional PublicProsecutor, accepts notice on behalf of the State. Mr. Sanjeet Trivedi, learned counsel, ...
Sanjay Kumar Meena vs Govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5967/2026 & CM APPL. 29290/2026 SANJAY KUMAR MEENA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vijay Kumar Meena, Advocate.versusGOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, SC (GNCTD) with Mr. N.K. Singh, Ms. Aliza Alam and Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat, Advocates for R-1 & 3. Mr. Uday Seth, Advocate for R-2, 4 & 5.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAORDER% 04.05.20261. The present petition seeks quashing of the communication dated 26 thFebruary, 2026 issued by Respondent No. 2 (Delhi Transco Limited), whereby the candidature of the Petitioner for the post of Assistant Electric Fitter (Post Code 77/23), pursuant to selection conducted by the Respondent No. 3 (Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board1), has been cancelled on the ground that the experience certificate submitted by him was not supported by additional documentary evidence such as salary slips, EPF records or similar material.2. Res...
Avneet Kaur & Ors. vs the State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
$~103-Q* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3378/2026 AVNEET KAUR & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Yoginder Singh Chaudhary, AdvversusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms Manjeet Arya, APP along with Mr. Abhimanyu Arya, Adv SI Rajni, SI Sohanvir Mr. Shivam Choudhary, Mr. Yogender Singh, Mr. Kunal Sharma, Mr. Ajay Saroha, Advs. for R-2 with R-2 in person.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 04.05.20261. The petitioners have filed this petition under Section 528 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS] (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC]) seeking quashing of FIR No. 520/2020, dated 26.08.2020, registered at Police Station Hari Nagar, Delhi, under Sections 323/342/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [IPC], and all proceedings emanating therefrom, on the ground of settlement.2. Issue notice. Ms Manjeet Arya, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, accepts notice on behalf of ...
Ms PS2 Consultants vs Ms Alpha Corp Development Private Limited
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 804/2026 MS PS2 CONSULTANTS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nitin Mangla and Mr. Nishchay Kapoor, Advocates.versusMS ALPHA CORP DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Surjendu Sankar Das, Ms. Annie Mittal and Mr. Vishal Rishi Srivastava, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJANORDER% 04.05.20261. By way of the present petition filed under Section 11(6) of theArbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter the Act) petitioner seeks appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudication the disputes between the parties under the agreement being work order bearing no. ACDPL/KKJ/PS2C/WO/ACWTC/2023-24/001dated 01.02.2024.2. The agreement provides for the resolution of the disputes by arbitration. Clause 44 of the work order contains an arbitration clause. The clause also provides that seat of arbitration shall be at Delhi.3. The disputes having arisen between the parties, petitioner invoked thearbitration clause by ...
- ‹ Prev
- 442
- 443
- 444
- 445
- 446
- 448
- 449
- 450
- 451
- 452
- Next ›
- Last »