Delhi Court May 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sh Raj Kishor Rai vs the State (N.C.T.) Delhi, & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-05-2026
$~25 & 26* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 4260/2023 & CRL.M.A. 15998/2023 SH RAJ KISHOR RAI .....Petitioner VC) THE STATE (N.C.T.) DELHI, & ORS. .....Respondents State/R-1 with SI Sunny Khatri, PS Aman Vihar and + CRL.M.C. 4261/2023 & CRL.M.A. 16000/2023 RAJ KISHORE RAI .....Petitioner VC) STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondent State/R-1CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 05.05.20261. Both the petitions being connected have been taken up together.2. Dispute is essentially within the family and when the petitioner hadCRL.M.C. 4260/2023 & CRL.M.C. 4261/2023 1 filed separate complaints and also prayed for investigation under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., his such applications were dismissed by the concerned Magisterial Court.3. He challenged aforesaid orders by filing separate revision petitions and his such revision petitions were dismissed by the learned Sessions Court videorder dated 30.09.2022.4. These orders are under challe...
Manjit Singh vs M/S Capitol Estates Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on: 27th February, 2026 Pronounced on: 05th May, 2026 + RFA 283/2021, CM APPL. 25354/2021 & CM APPL. 13405/2026 MANJIT SINGH S/o Late Major Madan Singh R/o H-31, Ground Floor, Masjid Moth, Greater Kailash-II, New Delhi. .....Appellant Through: Mr. Achin Goel and Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocates.versusM/S CAPITOL ESTATES PVT. LTD. Apartment No.107 B/1, The Capital Court, Olof Palme Marg, Munirka, South West Delhi, Delhi. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vaibhav Kalra, Ms. Neha Bhatnagar and Ms. Yashika Jorwal, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAJ U D G M E N TNEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.1. Appeal under Section 96 read with Order XLI Rule 1 of CPC hasbeen filed on behalf of the Appellant Manjit Singh against Final Order and Decree dated 09.04.2021, whereby Suit of the Plaintiff / Respondent for Specific Performance, Damages, etc., has been decreed against Appellant for Rs.1,30,00,000/- along with propor...
Pawan Kaul vs Delhi Development Authority & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 8555/2021, CM APPL. 27307/2022 PAWAN KAUL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohit Siwach, Mr. Karan Sharma, Mr. Harsh Gautam and Ms. Khyati Goel, Advs.versusDELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Arun Birbal, Adv. Mr. Devvrat Yadav, SPC with Mr. Gaurav Patel, GPCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKARHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLAJUDGMENT (ORAL)% 05.05.2026C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. This writ petition assails judgment dated 14 October 2020 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal1 in OA 1543/2020.2. By the impugned judgment, the Tribunal has dismissed the OA which had been filed by the petitioner before it.3. The facts are brief.4. On 24 June 2019, the petitioner was promoted from the post of1 the Tribunal hereinafter Digitally Signed By:AJIT Page 1 of 11 Junior Secretarial Assistant2 to Senior Secretarial Assistant3 in the Delhi Development Authority4.5. While he was employed as SSA, t...
Richa Paliwal & Ors. vs State(Govt of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3682/2024 & CRL.M.A. 20296/2025 RICHA PALIWAL & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Rimika Chauhan, Advocate.versusSTATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP for the State.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 05.05.20261. The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present petition.2. Accordingly, the present petition, along with pending application, stands dismissed as withdrawn.3. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J MAY 05, 2026/zp/apThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/05/2026 at 11:10:04...
Mahua Gupta & Anr vs Binay Bhushan & Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 562/2019 MAHUA GUPTA & ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Shohit Chaudhry, Adv. with petitioner-in-personversusBINAY BHUSHAN & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Abhinav Sharma, Mr. Ujjwal Jain, Advs. for DoECORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 05.05.20261. In view of the order dated 05.05.2026 passed in W.P.(C) 11955/2019 and W.P.(C) 11969/2019, the present contempt petition has become infructuous and hence, is dismissed. JASMEET SINGH, J MAY 5, 2026/spThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/05/2026 at 11:59:38...
Leena Paulose vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-05-2026
$~P-1* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 08.04.2026Pronounced on: 05.05.2026Uploaded on: 05.05.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 1802/2024 & CRL.M.A. 18038/2025, CRL.M.A. 32923-32924/2025 LEENA PAULOSE .....PetitionerversusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Appearances:- For Petitioner: Mr. Anant Malik, Mr. Paul John, Mr. Kunal Narwal & Ms. Ananya Chandra, Advocates. For Respondent: Mr. Sanjay Jain, Senior Advocate with Mr. Akhand Pratap Singh, SPP & Mr. Nishank Tripathi, Mr. Krishna Mohan Chandel, Ms. Samriddhi Dobhal, Mr. Apoorv Paliya, Advocates.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANJUDGMENT1. By way of this application under Section 439 of the Code ofCriminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC] (corresponding to Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS]), the petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with FIR No. 208/2021, dated 07.08.2021, lodged at Police Station Special Cell, Delhi. The FIR was originally registered under Sections 170/384/385/388...
Rajesh Gupta vs Anup Mittal
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(OS) 450/2023, I.A. 14118/2023 RAJESH GUPTA .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sachin Bansal and Ms. Arti Sharma, Advocates.versusANUP MITTAL .....Defendant Through: Ms. Shraddha Bhargava, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASADORDER% 05.05.20261. The present Suit has been filed with the following prayers:i. Pass a decree in favour of the Plaintiff and against the Defendant, thereby directing the Defendant to permanently abstain from making any defamatory statements against the Plaintiff. ii. Pass a decree, directing the Defendant to issue a public apology in a newspaper of the Plaintiffs choosing or as mandated by this Hon'ble Court, disseminated across India, rescinding the defamatory statements made by the Defendant. iii. Pass a decree in favour of the Plaintiff and against the Defendant for damages to the tune of INR 2,50,00,000/-, and future interest at the rate of 12% per annum. iv. Pass such other order(s) as ...
State (Gnctd) vs Manoj Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 24.03.2026Judgment pronounced on: 05.05.2026Judgment uploaded on: 08.05.2026+ CRL.REV.P. 649/2024 STATE (GNCTD) .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State along with SI Akash.versusMANOJ KUMAR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manish Rohilla, Mr. Pradeep Kumar Yadav, Mr. Mahesh Arasu, Mr. Abhishek Singh and Mr. Aman Singh, Advocates + CRL.REV.P. 699/2024 RAJESH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anand Shankar and Mr. Amit Kumar, Advs.versusTHE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State along with SI Akash. Mr. Manish Rohilla, Mr. Pradeep Kumar Yadav, Mr. Signature Not Verified CRL.REV.P. 649/2024 & connected matter Page 1 of 24 Mahesh Arasu, Mr. Abhishek Singh and Mr. Aman Singh, Advocates for R-2.CORAM:HONBLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAJUDGMENTDR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J1. By way of the present revision petitions, the petitioners, i...
Rajesh Kumar vs the State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 24.03.2026Judgment pronounced on: 05.05.2026Judgment uploaded on: 08.05.2026+ CRL.REV.P. 649/2024 STATE (GNCTD) .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State along with SI Akash.versusMANOJ KUMAR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manish Rohilla, Mr. Pradeep Kumar Yadav, Mr. Mahesh Arasu, Mr. Abhishek Singh and Mr. Aman Singh, Advocates + CRL.REV.P. 699/2024 RAJESH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anand Shankar and Mr. Amit Kumar, Advs.versusTHE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State along with SI Akash. Mr. Manish Rohilla, Mr. Pradeep Kumar Yadav, Mr. Signature Not Verified CRL.REV.P. 649/2024 & connected matter Page 1 of 24 Mahesh Arasu, Mr. Abhishek Singh and Mr. Aman Singh, Advocates for R-2.CORAM:HONBLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAJUDGMENTDR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J1. By way of the present revision petitions, the petitioners, i...
Pawan Kumar vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6722/2025 PAWAN KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Santwana Agarwal and Ms. Saumya Agarwal, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Syed Abdul Haseeb, CGSC with Mr. Muhammad Aamir Khan and Mr. Syed Abdur Rahman, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 05.05.20261. The Petitioner, at present, is working as ASI (Clerk) in CISF. Ameeting of the Departmental Promotion Committee had been held and the Petitioners name has been recommended by the Committee on 05.09.2023 for promotion to the rank of SI (Ministerial), however, actual promotion has been withheld on account of criminal case registered by Petitioners wife against the Petitioner under Sections2. Through the present petition, the Petitioner prays for promotion as SI (Ministerial) on ad-hoc basis.3. It is contended that the Petitioner could not be denied promotionon account of a pending criminal case...
- ‹ Prev
- 421
- 422
- 423
- 424
- 425
- 427
- 428
- 429
- 430
- 431
- Next ›
- Last »