Delhi Court May 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Yashul Sharma vs Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-05-2026
$~45, 47,49 & 50* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6089/2026, CM APPL. 29981/2026 and CM APPL. ABINASH NANDA .....Petitioner (47) + W.P.(C) 6100/2026, CM APPL. 30003/2026 and CM APPL. YASHUL SHARMA .....Petitioner (49) + W.P.(C) 6104/2026, CM APPL. 30007/2026 and CM APPL. JAI BHAGWAN .....Petitioner(50) + W.P.(C) 6108/2026, CM APPL. 30012/2026 and CM APPL. GURU DATT BHATT .....PetitionerCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 05.05.20261. Learned counsel representing the Petitioners, upon realizing thatthe representations submitted by the Petitioners are still pending consideration, seeks permission to withdraw the present batch of four Writ Petitions in order to pursue the said representations.2. In view of the aforesaid position, the present four Writ Petitions, along with pending applications, are dismissed as withdrawn.3. A photocopy of the order passed today be kept in the connected matters.ANIL KSHETARPAL, ...
Deepak & Anr. vs State (Govt of Nct of Delhi ) & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3466/2026 DEEPAK & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. S.K. Tiwari, Mr. Gopesh Tripathi and Ms. Aarti Minj, AdvocatesversusSTATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ) & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State. Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate for R-2 and 3.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 05.05.2026 CRL.M.A. 14058/2026 (exemption)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 3466/20263. By way of the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of theFIR bearing No. 505/2025, registered at Police Station Alipur, Outer North, Delhi, for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 115(2)/126(2)/79/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (hereafter BNS') and all consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.4. Issue notice. The learned APP accepts notice on behalf of the State.5. All the petitioners and respondent no. 2 & 3 are...
Aayan Khan vs Nemat Jahan
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.REV.P.(MAT.) 248/2026 AAYAN KHAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar Jha and Mr. Ratnakar Martiyar, Advs.versusNEMAT JAHAN .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 05.05.2026 CRL.M.A. 14083/2026 (Delay of 110 days in filing the present petition)1. By virtue of the present application, the petitioner seeks condonation of delay of 110 days in filing the present petition.2. Considering the assertions made therein, the present application is allowed and the delay of 110 days in filing the present petition is condoned.3. The present application is disposed of. CRL.REV.P.(MAT.) 248/2026, CRL.M.A. 14084/2026 (Stay), CRL.M.A. 14085/2026 (for exemption)4. By virtue of the present petition under Section 438 read withSection 442 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the petitioner seeks the following reliefs:- (a) to set-aside/ amend/ modify the order dated 23.09.2025 and 03....
Jitender Garg vs Bses Yamuna Power Limited & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6122/2026 JITENDER GARG .....Petitioner Through: Petitioner (in-Person).versusBSES YAMUNA POWER LIMITED & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sandeep Prabhakar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vikas Mehta, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAORDER% 05.05.20261. The Petitioner, an employee of the Respondent Company andformerly with Delhi Vidyut Board [DVB], asserts that he acquired AMIE (Electrical Engineering) qualification in March, 2015, which stands duly reflected in his service record. It is his case that on the basis of the said qualification, he became eligible for consideration for promotion to the post of DGM (E/M) with effect from April, 2015. However, according to the Petitioner, he was granted promotion only in the year 2016 on the basis of his diploma qualification.2. The grievance of the Petitioner is that despite having submitted representations dated 15th September, 2025, 10th October, 2025 and 17th...
Reward Business Solutions Pvt Ltd vs Joint Director Directorate of Enf ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6113/2026 and CM APPL. 30051/2026, CM APPL. 30052/2026, CM APPL. 30053/2026 REWARD BUSINESS SOLUTIONS PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Prakash, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Priyamvada Singhania, Mr. Aman Malik, Mr. Varun Kalra, Ms. Sneha Barange, Mr. Ali Khan with Mr. Krishan Kumar,.Adv.,versusJOINT DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi Standing Counsel for ED with Mr Sangeet Sibou, Mr Aniket Kumar Singh and Mr Priyansh Raj Singh Senger, Advocates.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 05.05.20261. Mr. Ravi Prakash learned senior counsel for the petitioner after making brief submissions seeks permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to take appropriate remedy before the appropriate forum.2. The liberty, as prayed, is granted. The petition, along with pending applications, stands dismissed as withdrawn.3. All rights and contentions of the parties are left...
Sunil Pawar vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6082/2026, CM APPL. 29971/2026 & CM APPL. SUNIL PAWAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Saroj Kumar, Advocate (ThroughversusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Siddhant Soti, Advocate for R-1 and R-2/MCD Ms. Richa Dhawan, SPC for UoI with Mr. Anuj Chaturvedi & Ms. Yashita Jain, Advocates for R-3. (ThroughCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 05.05.2026 CM APPL. 29972/2026 (exemption)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 6082/20262. The present writ petition has been filed seeking direction torespondent-MCD to stop unauthorised construction being carried out at property No.210-A, Ward No.2, Near Durga Apartment, Mehrauli, New Delhi by respondent no.4. Photographs of the unauthorised construction have been filed along with the writ petition.3. Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent-MCD on advance notice W.P.(C) 6082/2026 Page 1 of 2submits that the show cause noti...
Rajiv Kumar Rana vs Consolidation Officer & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6068/2026, CM APPL. 29862/2026 RAJIV KUMAR RANA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Smita Maan, Mr. Vishal Maan, Ms. Hasrat Jaur Sandhu and Mr. Abhay Gahlot, Advocates.versusCONSOLIDATION OFFICER & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Lalltaksh Joshi and Ms. Minu Kumari, Advocates for R-1, 2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAORDER% 05.05.20261. The Petitioners grievance arises out of alleged non-compliance oforder dated 30th December, 2002 passed by the Financial Commissioner,Delhi in Case No. 244/2002-CA titled Chhattar Singh vs. Consolidation Officer (Narela).2. Considering that the present petition has been instituted after nearly24 years from the passing of the said order, this Court heard counsel for the Petitioner at some length both to understand the controversy and to ascertain whether any explanation was forthcoming for this extraordinary delay.3. The case set up by the Petitioner is that during consolidation pro...
Raj Lal Bhagat vs State of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3438/2026 RAJ LAL BHAGAT .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhinav Sekhri, DHCLSC, Advocate, Mr. Vishwajeet Bhati and Mr. Aru Vashisht, Advocates along with petitioner (in-person).versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Kiran Bairwa, APP for the State. Mr. Bipin Bihari Singh, AIR, Ms. Mahua Bose and Ms. Tanvee Bose, Advocates for R-2 and 3 along with R-2 and 3 (in-person). SI Ashutosh Mishra and SI Vinod Kumar.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 05.05.2026 CRL.M.A. 13954/2026 (exemption) Exemption granted, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 3438/2026 By way of the present petition filed under section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioner seeks quashing of case FIR No.0629/2018 dated 22.09.2018 registered under sections 323/354/506/509 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) at P.S.: Mehrauli, South Delhi.2. The petition i...
Manshi Gupta vs Govt. of Delhi N.C.T & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 796/2026 MANSHI GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: None.versusGOVT. OF DELHI N.C.T & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Dhruv Rohatgi, Mr. Dhruv Kumar and Ms. Chandrika Sachdev, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 05.05.2026 CM APPL.29969/2026 (Exemption)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of. CM APPL.29970/2026 (seeking condonation of delay in re-filing the petition)3. This is an application filed by the petitioner seeking delay of 16 days in re-filing the petition.4. Considering the averments made in the application, the same is allowed and the delay of 16 days stands condoned.5. The application stands disposed of. CONT.CAS(C) 796/20266. None appears for the petitioner.7. The present petition alleges wilful disobedience of the directions contained in the order dated 22.04.2025, passed in W.P.(C) 5086/2025.8. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that necessarycompl...
Sh Baljeet Singh Gill vs Exl Service.Com (India) Private Limited
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 369/2026 & I.A. 12560/2026 SH BALJEET SINGH GILL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Tarun Kashyap, Adv.versusEXL SERVICE.COM (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Ms. Renu Gupta, Ms. Pratiksha Jalan, Mr. Hardik Malik, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 05.05.20261. This petition is filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of period for concluding the arbitration proceedings.2. Learned counsel for the respondent has no serious objection to the prayer made.3. In view of the above, the time period for conclusion of the proceedings is extended by six months.4. This petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. AVNEESH JHINGAN, J MAY 5, 2026 haThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server...
- ‹ Prev
- 418
- 419
- 420
- 421
- 422
- 424
- 425
- 426
- 427
- 428
- Next ›
- Last »