Delhi Court May 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sh. Azharuddin Khan @ Azru & Anr. vs State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3442/2026 SH. AZHARUDDIN KHAN @ AZRU & ANR. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sandesh Jha, Advocate.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 05.05.20261. Petitioners herein seek quashing of FIR No. 43/2022 dated 09.08.2022,registered at Police Station Cyber Police Station, Outer North District for commission of offences under Sections 420 and 120-B IPC, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.2. According to learned counsel for petitioner, there are only two accusedpersons and they both have been charge-sheeted for offence under Section 420 read with Section 120-B IPC. They submit that the concerned complainant has already settled the matter with the accused persons and, therefore, it is a fit case where the proceedings should be quashed.3. Learned APP for St...
Chandra Prakash vs Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5999/2026 CHANDRA PRAKASH .....Petitioner Through: Counsel (Appearance not given)versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ankur Yadav, SPC with Ms. Anupriya Yadav, Adv. and Mr. Akash Chandrayan, GP. DC Markhanday Mishra, Insp. Sanjay Kumar and SI Atul Sen.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 05.05.2026 CM APPL. 29410/2026 [exemption from filing original / certified copies of orders / documents]1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 5999/2026 & CM APPL. 29411/20263. Through the present writ petition, the Petitioner prays for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus to re-fix Petitioners pensionary benefits by granting one notional increment.4. Learned counsel representing the Respondents submits thatnecessary relief has already been granted to the Petitioner vide orderdated 27.04.2026.5. Consequently, the pres...
Ruby Newton vs State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3464/2026 RUBY NEWTON .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Deeksha Sharma, Adv. with petitioner in personversusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for the State with Ms. Upasna Bakshi, Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh and Mr. Gourav Singh, Advs. with SI Sunit, PS: Jagat Puri Mr. Nitesh Gupta, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in personCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 05.05.20261. By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.382/2022 dated 21.10.2022 registered at PS: Jagat Puri, Delhi under Sections 379 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and all proceedings emanating therefrom, in view of the Memorandum of Understanding dated 28.04.2026 [Annexure B] arrived at between the petitioner and the respondent no.2 which is accompanied by their respective proofs of identities.2. Issue notice.3. Learned APP for...
Surya Prakash Soni vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6091/2026 & CM APPL. 29988/2026(Stay), CM APPL. 29989/2026 (Direction) SURYA PRAKASH SONI .....Petitioner Through: Appearance not given.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Himanshu Pathak, SPC with Mr. Mohit Gupta, Adv. Mr. Vinod Sawant, Law Officer, Insp. Aturv and Mr. Ramniwas Yadav, CRPF.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMAORDER% 05.05.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950, seeks the following prayers: -A. Issue a writ in the nature of Certiorari or direction for quashing and setting aside the impugned order dated 07.04.2026, issued under section 3 B of the Public Premises Act, 1 97 1 by the Estate Officer, Directorate of Estate, whereby the Petitioner was asked to immediately vacate the said premises, i.e, Government Accommodation at 503 D, Tyagraj Nagar, Delhi.B. Pass any other and further order(...
Sadhna Bhardwaj vs Dgp Tihar Jail & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 1453/2026 SADHNA BHARDWAJ .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh & Mr. Manish Kumar, Advs.versusDGP TIHAR JAIL & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC with Mr. Arjit Sharma and Ms. Sakshi Jha, Advs. with SI Arun Kr. PS: PaharganjCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 05.05.20261. By virtue of the present petition under Article 226 of theConstitution of India, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs: a) Issue an appropriate writ, order, or direction directing the Respondents to immediately conduct the required cardiac medical procedure of the Petitioners husband in a time- bound manner. b) Direct the Respondents to present complete medical records of the Petitioner's Husband from 01.04.2026 till date c) Direct the Respondents to allow the family members of the Petitioners husband, on a rotational basis and one at a time, to remain present and provide necessary attend...
Ambience Pvt Ltd vs Moran Plantation Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-05-2026
$~63 to 65* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P. (MISC.) 9/2026 & I.A. 12460/2026 MORAN PLANTATION PVT LTD .....Respondent + O.M.P. (MISC.) 10/2026 & I.A. 12461/2026 MILI MARKETING PVT LTD .....Respondent + O.M.P. (MISC.) 11/2026 & I.A. 12462/2026 PARASRAMKA HOLDINGS PVT LTD .....RespondentCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 05.05.20261. These petitions are filed under Section 29A(4) and 29A(5) of theArbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking following prayer: O.M.P. (MISC.) 9/2026 Pvt. Ltd vs M/s Moran Plantation Pvt. Ltd and M/s. Moran Plantation Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M/s. Ambience Pvt. Ltd.& Anr. consolidated as M/s. Moran Plantation Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M/s. O.M.P. (MISC.) 10/2026 Pvt. Ltd vs M/s Mili Marketing Pvt. Ltd and M/s. Mili Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M/s. Ambience Pvt. Ltd.& Anr. consolidated as M/s. Mili Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M/s. O.M.P. (MISC.) 11/2026 Pvt. Ltd vs M/s Parasramka Holdings Pvt. Ltd and M/s. Parasramka Holdings...
Avishek Nunia & Anr. vs Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-05-2026
$~44 and 51* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6076/2026 and CM APPL. 29946/2026 AVISHEK NUNIA & ANR. .....Petitioners(51) + W.P.(C) 6110/2026 and CM APPL. 30014/2026 UTHAMARAJA M .....PetitionerCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 05.05.20261. This order shall dispose of the above-captioned two (02) Writ Petitions, wherein identical reliefs have been sought.2. For ready reference, the prayer made in W.P.(C) 6076/2026 isreproduced as under: A direction to the Standing Screening Committee of the Respondent/CISF at CISF Headquarters, New Delhi to decide the correctness and antecedents of the documents produced by the Petitioner Nos. 1 & 2, showing proof in support of the fact that no case/FIR is pending against them, within two weeks, as no caseswhatsoever are pending against the Petitioners herein3. As is evident, the only prayer made by the Petitioners is for adirection to the Standing Screening Committee (...
Salman Qureshi vs State (Gnct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1739/2026 SALMAN QURESHI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vikram Singh Pawar, Mr. Dinesh Bhaduria, Mr. Utkarsh Soni, Mr. Jai Choudhary and Mr. Siddharth Goyal, AdvocatesversusSTATE (GNCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 05.05.2026 CRL.M.A. 14024/2026 & CRL.M.A. 14025/2026 (exemption)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Applications stand disposed of. BAIL APPLN. 1739/20263. By way of the instant application, the applicant seeks grant of regularbail in case arising out of FIR bearing no. 001/2026, registered at Police Station GTB Enclave, Delhi for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 311/3(5)/324(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (hereafter BNS) and Section 25/27 of Arms Act, 1959.4. Briefly stated, the facts of the present case are that the present FIR was registered on the statement of the ...
Jai Bhagwan vs Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-05-2026
$~45, 47,49 & 50* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6089/2026, CM APPL. 29981/2026 and CM APPL. ABINASH NANDA .....Petitioner (47) + W.P.(C) 6100/2026, CM APPL. 30003/2026 and CM APPL. YASHUL SHARMA .....Petitioner (49) + W.P.(C) 6104/2026, CM APPL. 30007/2026 and CM APPL. JAI BHAGWAN .....Petitioner(50) + W.P.(C) 6108/2026, CM APPL. 30012/2026 and CM APPL. GURU DATT BHATT .....PetitionerCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 05.05.20261. Learned counsel representing the Petitioners, upon realizing thatthe representations submitted by the Petitioners are still pending consideration, seeks permission to withdraw the present batch of four Writ Petitions in order to pursue the said representations.2. In view of the aforesaid position, the present four Writ Petitions, along with pending applications, are dismissed as withdrawn.3. A photocopy of the order passed today be kept in the connected matters.ANIL KSHETARPAL, ...
Kamal Alias Amandeep vs the State Govt Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1738/2026 KAMAL ALIAS AMANDEEP .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sujit Kumar, Mr. Rohit Singh, Mr. Roshan Kumar, Ms. Supriya, Advoates.versusTHE STATE GOVT NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Priyanka Dalal, APP with SI Pawan Kr.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 05.05.2026 CRL.M.A. 14002/2026(exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. BAIL APPLN. 1738/20261. Applicant seeks extension of interim bail granted to him by this Court on 20.04.2026.2. The mother of the applicant was found admitted in PGI Rohtak and was, reportedly, suffering from breast cancer.3. As per the report submitted by the prosecution on 20.04.2026, themother had already undergone surgery on 16.04.2026 and the surgery was in relation to a lump suspected to be cancerous. Interim bail was granted, while observing as under:- 6. Undoubtedly, there are other family members of the applicant who have taken care of the mother of applic...
- ‹ Prev
- 417
- 418
- 419
- 420
- 421
- 423
- 424
- 425
- 426
- 427
- Next ›
- Last »