Delhi Court May 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sarthak Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. vs Telecom Regulatroy Authority of Ind ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on: 07.04.2026Judgment pronounced on: 29.05.2026Judgment uploaded on: 29.05.2026+ W.P.(C) 7982/2013, CM APPL. 18654/2015 and CM APPL. 9X MEDIA PVT. LTD. & ORS .....Petitioners Through:versusTELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA.....Respondent Through:+ W.P.(C) 7983/2013B4U BROADBAND (INDIA) PVT. LTD. & ORS.....Petitioners Through:versusTELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA.....Respondent Through:+ W.P.(C) 7984/2013TV VISION LIMITED & ORS.....Petitioner Through:versusTELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA.....Respondent Through:+ W.P.(C) 7985/2013SUN TV NETWORKS LIMITED .....Petitioner Through:Signing Date:29.05.2026W.P,(C) 7982/2013 and connected matters Page 1 of 68versusTELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA.....Respondent Through:+ W.P.(C) 7987/2013E 24 GLAMORU LIMITED .....Petitioner Through:versusTELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA.....Respondent Through:+ W.P.(C) 7988/2013PIONE...
Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation vs Aarti Kanda & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on : 30th April 2026 Pronounced on : 29th May 2026 Uploaded on : 30th May 2026+ MAC.APP. 20/2022 & CM APPL. 4585/2022UTTAR PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORTCORPORATION.....Appellant Through: Mr. Shadab Khan, Advocate.versusAARTI KANDA & ORS......Respondents Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate with Mr. Ritik Singh, Advocate for R-1 to 3.+ MAC.APP. 444/2023POOJA & ORS. .....Appellants Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate with Mr. Ritik Singh, AdvocateversusMOHD GULZAR & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shadab Khan, Advocate forR-2.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYALJUDGMENTANISH DAYAL, J.1. These appeals arise out of the same accident, being, MAC. APP.No. 20/2022, which has been filed by the Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (hereinafter, Corporation) assailing theKUMAR CHOUDHARY MAC.APP. 20/2022 & MAC APP. 444/2023 Page 1 of 19impugned judgment and award dated 12th November 2021 [here...
Sandeep Bidhuri vs State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 523/2026 & CRL.M.(BAIL) 1069/2026SANDEEP BIDHURI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Arjun Mahajan with Mr. Raghvendra N. Budholia, Mr. Shahbaj Singh, Mr. Harshit Kapoor, Ms. Bhavya Arora, Advocates.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shoaib Haider, APP for the State.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 29.05.2026 The present matter has been listed today i.e. 29.05.2026, since 28.05.2026 was declared a holiday.2. By way of the present petition filed under section 483 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioner seeks regular bail in case FIR No.0515/2025 dated 30.08.2025 registered under sections 103(1)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 at P.S.: Kalkaji, South East Delhi.3. Notice on this petition was issued vid order dated 05.02.2026.4. Status Report dated 27.03.2026 has been filed in the matter.5. Nominal Roll dated 25.05.2026 has be...
Preeti Bhutani & Anr. vs Ashwani Goyal & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 216/2026 & CM APPL. 37534/2026PREETI BHUTANI & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajeshwari H. And Ms. Garima Joshi, Advs.versusASHWANI GOYAL & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Beenashaw N. Soni, Mr. Harsh Ahuja, Mr. Rishabh Saxena, Mr. Nakul Singh and Mr. Himanshu Verma, Advs. for R-1 and 2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 29.05.20261. The Local Commissioner has completed the exercise and has filed thereport. The Local Commissioner is present in Court and submits that an amount of Rs.3,500/- was realized by disposing of the infringing material to a scrap dealer. Let the said amount be appropriated by the Local Commissioner towards the expenses incurred.2. Let the parties pay an additional sum of Rs.50,000/- each to the LocalCommissioner.3. With the destruction of the infringing material the controversybetween the parties stands substantially resolved.4. Respective...
Zenith Flooring Services Pvt. Ltd vs Mis Prism Jhonson Ltd
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 305/2026 & CM APPL. 8231/2026ZENITH FLOORING SERVICES PVT. LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Himanshu Kapoor, Advocate through VC.versusMIS PRISM JHONSON LTD .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 29.05.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. In view of the Notification bearing No. 77/I-G-4/Gen1.-I/DHC dated26th May, 2026, the present matter is taken up today, i.e., 29th May, 2026.3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that he seeks permission towithdraw the present petition.4. Keeping in view the submissions of the learned Counsel for thepetitioner, the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, JMAY 29, 2026/MR/TPThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning t...
Central CIVIL Pensioners Forum Acting Through & Ors. vs Union of India ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 27.03.2026Judgment pronounced on: 29.05.2026Judgment uploaded on: 29.05.2026+ W.P.(C) 12781/2024, CM APPL. 53286/2024 and CM APPL. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....PetitionersversusSUB TRILOK CHAND RETD NO. JC374073A & ANR......Respondents+ W.P.(C) 13535/2024 ASHOK KUMAR VOHRA & ORS. .....PetitionersversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents+ W.P.(C) 736/2025 and CM APPL. 3642/2025 SOHAN SINGH NEGI AND ORS .....PetitionersversusUNION OF INDIA, THROUGH ITS SECRETARYMINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS & ORS. .....Respondents+ W.P.(C) 825/2025 and CM APPL. 4069/2025 REWAT SINGH SHEKHAWAT AND ORS .....PetitionersversusSigning Date:29.05.2026 Page 1 of 50UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARYMINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS & ORS. .....Respondents+ W.P.(C) 17005/2024RETIRED RAILWAY PROTECTION FORCE EMPLOYEESASSOCIATION NORTHERN RAILWAY DELHI DIVISION.....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents+ W.P.(C) 17877...
Rama CIVIL India Construction Private Ltd Through Authorized Represent ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on: 24.04.2026Judgment pronounced on: 29.05.2026+ ARB.P. 1787/2025, I.A. 30458/2025 (U/O 1 Rule 10), I.A. O.A. 42/2026 (Seeking setting aside of the order dt. 23.01.2026 passed by the Ld. Joint Registrar (Judicial) & REVIEW PET. 187/2026 (Filed on behalf of the R-2, Seeking review of the order dt. 02.04.2026)M/S RAMACIVIL INDIA CONSTRUCTION PVT LTDTHROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVEDIRECTOR SH R N GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Avinash Trivedi, Mr. Dipanshu Gaba, Ms. Ritika Trivedi, Mr. Rahul Aggarwal, Mr. Anurag Kaushik, Mr. Jatin Arora, Mr. Rhythem Nagpal, Mr. Rishank Gola and Mr. Aryan Sangwan, Advocates.versusCENTRAL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT THROUGHITS ADDL DIRECTOR GENERAL .....Respondent Through: Mr. Vikram Jetly, CGSC along with Ms. Laavanya Kaushik, GP, Ms. Shreya Jetly and Ms. Khyaati Bansal, Advocates for Respondent No. 1. Mr. Rajshekhar Rao, Senior...
Pratibha Verma vs Abhishek Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 16.03.2026Judgment delivered on: 29.05.2026+ MAT.APP.(F.C.) 56/2024, CM APPL. 9407/2024 & CM APPL.PRATIBHA VERMA .....Appellant Through: Ms. Amulya Dhingra, Adv.versusABHISHEK KUMAR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Danish Aftab Chowdhury, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARYHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGARJUDGMENT1. The present appeal, under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act,1984 read with Order XLIII Rule 1(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, assails the Order dated 11.01.2024, passed by the learned Family Court, whereby the Appellants Application under Order IX Rule 13 of the CPC, seeking setting aside of the ex-parte decree and judgment dated 03.08.2022, came to be dismissed.2. Briefly stated, the Respondent/husband had instituted a petitionunder Section 13(1)(i) and 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, seeking dissolution of marriage on the grounds of adultery and cruelt...
Soyab vs State Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 1623/2026 SOYAB .....Petitioner Through: Mr. V.K. Sharma, Adv. alongwith petitioner in personversusSTATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for the State with Ms. Upasna Bakshi, Ms. Niketa Manish and Ms. Divya Bakshi, Advs. with SI Dayaram, PS Narela R-2 in personCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 29.05.20261. The present matter is being taken up today as 28.05.2026 wasdeclared a holiday.2. By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the petitioner seeks quashing of under Sections 323/341/354B/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) as also all proceedings emanating therefrom, in view of the (fresh) Memorandum of Understanding dated 21.05.2026 (MOU), handed over by the learned counsel for the petitioner, which is taken on record alongwith the affidavits of the parties.3. Issue notice. ...
Purshotam Kumar vs the State Goverment of Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 1311/2026, CRL.M.A. 5288/2026 PURSHOTAM KUMAR .....Petitioner Through:versusTHE STATE GOVERMENT OF NCT OF DELHI ANDANR .....Respondents Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 29.05.20261. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks, and is granted, a period oftwo weeks for filing fresh Memorandum of Understanding.2. Renotify on 28.07.2026.SAURABH BANERJEE, JMAY 29, 2026/AbThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/06/2026 at 11:28:01...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »