Skip to content

Delhi Court May 2026 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

May 29 2026

Vinod Kumar Rathi vs the State of Nct of Delhi

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-29-2026

$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 29.05.2026+ BAIL APPLN. 99/2026 VINOD KUMAR RATHI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kartik Kumar, Mr. Gaurav Sharma and Mr. Anil Malik Advocates.versusTHE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Hemant Mehla, APP for State with IO/Inspector Rajesh Kumar. Mr. Jitender Bhardwaj, Advocate for complainant (through video conferencing)CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAJ U D G M E N T (ORAL)Matter taken up today as 28.05.2026 was declared a holiday on account of Eid al-Adha.1. The accused/applicant seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 389/2025 of PS Bawana for offence under Section 330(2)/305/331(4)/3(5)/ 318(4)/336(3)/340(2)/61(2) of BNS.BAIL APPLN. 99/2026 Page 1 of 5 pages Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIAGIRISH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec455 69af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638,KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, ...


May 29 2026

Nutech Contracts Pvt Ltd vs Tata Projects Ltd

Court: Delhi Orders

Decided on: May-29-2026

$~65 & 66 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 110/2026 MS NUTECH CONTRACTS PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Arbaaz Khan and Mr. Ravi Chikara, AdvocatesversusMS TATA PROJECTS LIMITED .....Respondent Through:+ ARB.P. 111/2026 MS NUTECH CONTRACTS PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Arbaaz Khan and Mr. Ravi Chikara, AdvocatesversusMS TATA PROJECTS LIMITED .....Respondent Through:CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD ORDER % 29.05.2026 THESE MATTERS HAVE BEEN RECEIVED ON TRANSFER I.A. 15910/2026 in ARB.P. 110/2026 I.A. 15911/2026 in ARB.P. 111/2026 1. These Applications have been filed on behalf of the Petitioner seeking permission to withdraw the present Petitions with liberty to take steps in accordance with law.This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/06/2026 at 11:00:51 ...


May 29 2026

Ms Nutech Contracts Pvt Ltd vs Ms Tata Projects Limited

Court: Delhi Orders

Decided on: May-29-2026

$~65 & 66 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 110/2026 MS NUTECH CONTRACTS PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Arbaaz Khan and Mr. Ravi Chikara, AdvocatesversusMS TATA PROJECTS LIMITED .....Respondent Through:+ ARB.P. 111/2026 MS NUTECH CONTRACTS PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Arbaaz Khan and Mr. Ravi Chikara, AdvocatesversusMS TATA PROJECTS LIMITED .....Respondent Through:CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD ORDER % 29.05.2026 THESE MATTERS HAVE BEEN RECEIVED ON TRANSFER I.A. 15910/2026 in ARB.P. 110/2026 I.A. 15911/2026 in ARB.P. 111/2026 1. These Applications have been filed on behalf of the Petitioner seeking permission to withdraw the present Petitions with liberty to take steps in accordance with law.This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/06/2026 at 10:58:37 ...


May 29 2026

Avg Logistics Limited vs M/S Shree Shyam Palace

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-29-2026

$~26 & 27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 17/2026 AVG LOGISTICS LIMITED .....Decree Holder Through: Mr. Nakul Grover, Adv.versusM/S SHREE SHYAM PALACE .....Judgement Debtor Through: Mr. Ravi Dev Sharma, Ms. Ritika Tawar and Mr. Prince Sharma, Advs. 27 + ARB. A. (COMM.) 15/2026, I.A. 1720/2026 (Stay), I.A. 1721/2026 (Ex. From filing the certified copy of the impugned order dt. 29.12.2025), I.A. 1722/2026 (Addl.Doc.) & I.A. 1723/2026 (Seeking permission to file longer synopsis and list of dates) SHREE SHYAM PALACE .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Dev Sharma, Ms. Ritika Tawar and Mr. Prince Sharma, Advs. versus AVG LOGISTICS LTD .....Respondent Through: Mr. Nakul Grover, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR ORDER % 29.05.2026 I.A. 15785/2026 (For settlement on behalf of the parties) in ARB. A. (COMM.) 15/20261. The present Application, under Section 30(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act...


May 29 2026

Shree Shyam Palace vs Avg Logistics Ltd

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-29-2026

$~26 & 27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 17/2026 AVG LOGISTICS LIMITED .....Decree Holder Through: Mr. Nakul Grover, Adv.versusM/S SHREE SHYAM PALACE .....Judgement Debtor Through: Mr. Ravi Dev Sharma, Ms. Ritika Tawar and Mr. Prince Sharma, Advs. 27 + ARB. A. (COMM.) 15/2026, I.A. 1720/2026 (Stay), I.A. 1721/2026 (Ex. From filing the certified copy of the impugned order dt. 29.12.2025), I.A. 1722/2026 (Addl.Doc.) & I.A. 1723/2026 (Seeking permission to file longer synopsis and list of dates) SHREE SHYAM PALACE .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Dev Sharma, Ms. Ritika Tawar and Mr. Prince Sharma, Advs. versus AVG LOGISTICS LTD .....Respondent Through: Mr. Nakul Grover, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR ORDER % 29.05.2026 I.A. 15785/2026 (For settlement on behalf of the parties) in ARB. A. (COMM.) 15/20261. The present Application, under Section 30(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act...


May 29 2026

Rewat Singh Shekhawat and Ors vs Union of India Through the Secretary ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-29-2026

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on: 27.03.2026 Judgment pronounced on: 29.05.2026 Judgment uploaded on: 29.05.2026 + W.P.(C) 12781/2024, CM APPL. 53286/2024 and CM APPL. 17282/2026 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through:versusSUB TRILOK CHAND RETD NO. JC374073A & ANR. .....Respondents Through:+ W.P.(C) 13535/2024 ASHOK KUMAR VOHRA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through:versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through:+ W.P.(C) 736/2025 and CM APPL. 3642/2025 SOHAN SINGH NEGI AND ORS .....Petitioners Through:versusUNION OF INDIA, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS & ORS. .....Respondents Through:+ W.P.(C) 825/2025 and CM APPL. 4069/2025 REWAT SINGH SHEKHAWAT AND ORS .....Petitioners Through:versus Signature Not Verified Signed By:JAI NARAYAN W.P.(C) 12781/2024 and connected matters Signing Date:29.05.2026 Page 1 of 50 13:06:37 UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS & OR...


May 29 2026

Lucky Dagar & Anr. vs the State(Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-29-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: May 19, 2026 % Pronounced on: May 29, 2026 + CRL.REV.P. 49/2024, CRL.M.A. 1246/2024 LUCKY DAGAR & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Surya Pratap Singh and Mr. Ishaan Jain, Advs. VersusTHE STATE(NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP with Ms. Upasna Bakshi, Ms. Divya Bakshi, Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh and Mr. Gourav Singh, Advs. With SI- Himanshu, PS: Najafgargh Mr. B.P. Vaishnav, Mr. M.S. Birjesh Sharma and Mr. Vinod Kataria, Advs. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE JUDGMENT1. By virtue of present petition under Sections 397/401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 19631, the petitioners seek setting aside of the order dated 23.12.20232 passed by learned ASJ-05, South-West District, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi3, whereby framing of charges under Sections 308/34 IPC has been directed. 2. Succinctly put, it is the case of the pe...


May 29 2026

Raagashree Impex Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner Dvat

Court: Delhi Orders

Decided on: May-29-2026

$~37 (28.05.2026) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 636/2026 RAAGASHREE IMPEX PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Chinmaya Seth, Mr. A.K. Seth, Ms. Palak Mathur, Advocates versus COMMISSIONER DVAT .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sumit K. Batra, Ms. Priyanka Jindal, AdvocatesCORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL ORDER % 29.05.2026[File taken up today in view of Notification No. 77/I-G-4/Genl.-I/DHC dated 26.05.2026, wherein the matters listed on 28th May, 2026 were directed to be taken up for hearing on 29th May, 2026.]1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the payment has already been received from the Department and as such, the cause cited in the present petition no longer survives and has been rendered infructuous. 2. In view of the aforesaid, the present petition stands disposed of.NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE, JAJAY DIGPAUL, J MAY 29, 2026/sky/skThis is a digitally signed order. The authe...


May 29 2026

Renu Daga vs Pradeep Kumar

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-29-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on: 9th April, 2026 Pronounced on: 29th May 2026+ RFA 44/2025 & CM APPL. 3127/2025 (stay) RENU DAGA W/o Sh. Rakesh Kumar Daga R/o G-17/15, Sector-15, Rohini, Delhi-110085 .....Appellant Through: Mr. Anupam Srivastava, Senior Advocate with Mr. Prakhar Bhatnagar, Mr. Arkam Pasha and Mr. Sourav Tyagi, Advocates versusPRADEEP KUMAR S/o Sh. Brij Kishore R/o House N. 18, Pocket-9, Sector-24, Rohini Delhi-110085 .....Respondent Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh Uppal, Mr. Ritik Mittal Mr. Lakshay Raj and Mr. Surender Kr. Sharma, AdvocatesCORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.1. Appeal under Section 96 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as CPC) has been filed on behalf of the Appellant against the impugned Judgment dated 23.12.2024, whereby the learned District Judge has decreed the Suit of the Plaintiff/Respondent, ...


May 29 2026

Kalaignar Tv Pvt. Ltd. vs Telecom Regulatory Authority of India

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-29-2026

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on: 07.04.2026 Judgment pronounced on: 29.05.2026 Judgment uploaded on: 29.05.2026 + W.P.(C) 7982/2013, CM APPL. 18654/2015 and CM APPL. 300/2016 9X MEDIA PVT. LTD. & ORS .....Petitioners Through:versusTELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Respondent Through:+ W.P.(C) 7983/2013 B4U BROADBAND (INDIA) PVT. LTD. & ORS .....Petitioners Through:versusTELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Respondent Through:+ W.P.(C) 7984/2013 TV VISION LIMITED & ORS .....Petitioner Through:versusTELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Respondent Through:+ W.P.(C) 7985/2013 SUN TV NETWORKS LIMITED .....Petitioner Signature Not Verified Signed By:JAI Through: NARAYAN Signing Date:29.05.2026W.P,(C) 7982/2013 and connected matters Page 1 of 68 13:02:36 versusTELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Respondent Through:+ W.P.(C) 7987/2013 E 24 GLAMORU LIMITED .....Petitioner Through:versusTELECOM...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial