Delhi Court May 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
National Highways Authority of India vs Roadway Solution India Pvt. Lt ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2026
$~32 & 33* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 29.05.2026 + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 321/2026+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 322/2026CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHANSHANKARJUDGEMENT (Oral)1. The present Petitions have been filed under Section 29-A(5) ofthe Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19961 seeking the extension of the mandate of the learned Sole Arbitrator.Act O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 321/2026 & connected matter Page 1 of 42. The material on record indicates that the parties entered intotwo Contracts dated 25.10.2013 and 18.12.20132 for short term improvement and routine maintenance for two distinct sections of NH-4. The said Contracts contain an identical dispute resolutionclause, being Clause 25 of both the Contracts, which contemplates adjudication of disputes arising from the Contracts by way of Arbitration.3. Subsequently, disputes arose between the parties, and theRespondent filed two Petitions under Secti...
Alcob Transmissions Pvt. Ltd. Through Its Authorize Representative Sh. ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 689/2026 ALCOB TRANSMISSIONS PVT. LTD. THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZE REPRESENTATIVE SH. LALIT KUMAR HARJAI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravikant Chandhok, Mr. Vasdev Lalwani and Mr. Tushar Sahni, Advocates Mob: 98112213677 Email: [email protected] FERROUS PVT. LTD. & ORS. .....Respondents Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNAORDER% 29.05.20261. The present petition has been filed under Section 11(6) of theArbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Arbitration Act), for appointment of a sole Arbitrator, for adjudication of disputes between the parties, arising out of the Purchase Order dated 15th June, 2024 (PO).2. None appears for the respondents, despite service.3. This Court notes that vide order dated 07th May, 2026, this Court hadclarified that, in case, respondents do not put in appearance, or file their replies, the Court shall proceed with the matter.4. Accordingly, this...
Mayank Aggarwal vs the State Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3396/2026, CRL.M.A. 13721/2026 MAYANK AGGARWAL ..Petitioner Through: Mr. Anuroop and Mr. Gaurav Bidhuri, Advs. Petitioner in personversusTHE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. ..Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for State with Ms. Nikita Manish and Ms. Upasna Bakshi, Advs. Mr. Manish Chaudhary, Adv. for R-2 SI- Vivek Kumar, PS: G.K-1. R-2 in person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 29.05.20261. The present matter is being taken up today as 28.05.2026 was declared a holiday.2. By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the petitioner seeks quashing of the FIR No.263/2024 dated 25.06.2024 registered at PS: Greater Kailash, Delhi under Sections 304A/279 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and all proceedings emanating therefrom since the petitioner and the respondent no.2 have settled all their disputes in view of the Memorandum of Und...
Mr Pathan Imrankhan Zafarullakhan & Anr. vs Microsoft Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 13.05.2026Judgment pronounced on: 29.05.2026+ O.M.P. (COMM) 223/2026, I.A. 12470/2026 (Stay) & I.A. MR PATHAN IMRANKHAN ZAFARULLAKHAN & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Anju Agrawal, Ms. Manisha Singh, Mr. Abhai Pandey, Ms. Khushi Chauhan and Ms. Vidhi Gupta, Advocates.versusMICROSOFT CORPORATION .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ashim Sood, Ms. Pooja Dodd, Mr. Anuraj Tirthankar, Ms. Senu Nizar, Mr. Karan and Mr. Kartikeya, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHANSHANKARJUDGMENTHARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J.1. The present Petition has been instituted under Section 34 of theArbitration and Conciliation Act, 19961, seeking the setting aside of the Arbitral Award dated 02.03.20262, rendered by the learned Sole Arbitrator in INDRP Case No. 2091 under the .IN Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy3. A&C Act Arbitral Award INDRP O.M.P. (COMM) 223/2026 Page 1 of 402. By way of the Impugned Arbitr...
Kritendra Sharma vs Govt of Nct of Delhi and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIJudgment Reserved on: 10.02.2026% Judgment Delivered on: 29.05.2026+ LPA 283/2022 KRITENDRA SHARMA .....AppellantVersusGOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND OTHERS .....RespondentsAND+ LPA 422/2022 & CM APPL. 30955-56/2022 DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION AND ANR .....AppellantsVersusCHAIRMAN ARYA GIRLS SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL .....RespondentAdvocates who appeared in these casesMr. Anuj Dhir, Advocate for Appellant in LPA 283/2022 and R2 in LPA 422/2022 Ms. Latika Chaudhary, Advocate for GNCTD. Mr. Ashish K. Dixit, CGSC with Mr. Umar Hashmi, Advocate for UoI.CORAM:HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIASigned By:NEELAM LPA 283/2022 & LPA 422/2022 Page 1 of 23JUDGMENTTEJAS KARIA, J1. These Letters Patent Appeals arise from the Judgment and Orderdated 24.01.2022 (Impugned Judgment) passed in W.P.(C) No. Arya Girls Secondary School, New Delhi (School), arrayed as Respondent No. 3 in LPA No. 283/2022 and Respondent No. 1 in ...
Virender vs the State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1761/2026 VIRENDER .....Applicant Through: Ms. Sakshi Sachdeva, Adv. (through VC)versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP with Ms. Upasna Bakshi, Ms. Divya Bakshi and Ms. Niketa Manish, Advocates with SI Sameer, PS: Swaroop Nagar Mr. Sarthak Karol, DHCLSC, Ms. Neelakshi Bhaduaria and Mr. Shashank Sharma, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 29.05.20261. The present matter is taken up today as 28.05.2026 was declared a holiday.2. Learned counsel for applicant seeks to withdraw the present application.3. As such, the present bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. SAURABH BANERJEE, J MAY 29, 2026/SoThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/06/2026 at 11:06:16...
M/S. Maa Television Network Limited vs Telecom Regulatory Authority of ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 07.04.2026Judgment pronounced on: 29.05.2026Judgment uploaded on: 29.05.2026+ W.P.(C) 7982/2013, CM APPL. 18654/2015 and CM APPL. 9X MEDIA PVT. LTD. & ORS .....Petitioners Through:versusTELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Respondent Through:+ W.P.(C) 7983/2013 B4U BROADBAND (INDIA) PVT. LTD. & ORS .....Petitioners Through:versusTELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Respondent Through:+ W.P.(C) 7984/2013 TV VISION LIMITED & ORS .....Petitioner Through:versusTELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Respondent Through:+ W.P.(C) 7985/2013 SUN TV NETWORKS LIMITED .....Petitioner Through:Signing Date:29.05.2026W.P,(C) 7982/2013 and connected matters Page 1 of 68versusTELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Respondent Through:+ W.P.(C) 7987/2013 E 24 GLAMORU LIMITED .....Petitioner Through:versusTELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Respondent Through:+ W.P.(C) 7988/2013 PIONEER CHANNEL FACTORY...
Vasudeva Jewellers (P) Ltd vs Kashish Rastogi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 521/2019, CM APPL. 15257/2019, CM APPL. 60342/2025 & CM APPL. 72113/2025 VASUDEVA JEWELLERS (P) LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Divyakant Lahoti and Mr. Karthik Lahoti, Advocates.versusKASHISH RASTOGI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Malvica Satija, Advocate through VC.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 29.05.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. Learned Counsels for the parties submits that the matter has beensettled between the parties vide Settlement Agreement dated 08th September,2025. The said settlement agreement is already on record.3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that, in view of thesettlement arrived at between the parties, the present petition has become infructuous and may be disposed of as withdrawn.4. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn alongwith pending applications, if any.RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J MAY ...
M/S Shri Uday Gold Palace vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5285/2026 M/S SHRI UDAY GOLD PALACE ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohtisham Ali, Adv.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Neeraj Dubey, SPC for R1 Mr. Shivang Singh , Mr. Pulin Kumar, Advs. for R2 Mr. Abhishek Baid, Mr. Mohit Kumar Bafna, Mr. Praneet Das and Mr. Ravinder Kumar, Advocates for R4/RBICORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 29.05.20261. Since there was a holiday on 28.05.2026, the matter was taken up forhearing today.2. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia seeking the following prayers :- a) Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ,order or direction, thereby directing Respondent No. 2 (HDFCBank Ltd.) to forthwith defreeze the Petitioners aforesaid bank account and restore full operational access thereto; b) Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ,order or direction calling for the records and quashin...
Amarnath Sharma vs State Through Sho & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3567/2026 AMARNATH SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pradeep Singh Rana, Adv. with Petitioner in personversusSTATE THROUGH SHO & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Raghuinder Verma, APP for State with Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh and Ms. Upasna Bakshi, Advocates Mr. Rahul, Adv. for R-3 to 7 Respondents in personCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 29.05.20261. By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner seek quashing of FIR No.6/2020 dated 15.01.2020 registered at PS.: Budh Vihar, District North- West, New Delhi under Sections 288/338/304A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and all proceedings emanating therefrom in view of Memorandum of Settlement dated 17.02.2020 [Annexure C], arrived at between the petitioner and Sirajul Chowdhary (now deceased), Memorandum of Settlement dated 21.02.2022 [Annexure D], arrived at between the petitioner and ...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »