Skip to content

Delhi Court May 2026 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

May 29 2026

Smt Devika and Ors vs Delhi Jal Board and Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-29-2026

$-* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIBEFOREHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV+ W.P (C) 3622/2021, C.M. APPL 10990/20211. SMT. DEVIKA (WIDOW AGED ABOUT 32 YRS)W/O LATE SH. DINESH KUMAR2. MS. URVASHI (MINOR AGED ABOUT 9 YRS)THROUGH HER MOTHER SMT. DEVIKA3. MS. DESHA (MINOR DAUGHTER 6 YRS)THROUGH HER MOTHER SMT. DEVIKA4. MR. NAKUL KUMAR (MINOR SON 2 YEARS)THROUGH HER MOTHER SMT. DEVIKA5. SMT. CHARAN DEVI (MOTHER AGED ABOUT 54 YRS)W/O SH. KRISHAN PALALL R/O 504, AGAR NAGARPREM NAGAR, SULEMAN NAGARNANGLOI, DELHI-11086.....PETITIONERS(Through: Mr. Nitin Jain and Mr. Madhav Aggarwal, Advs.)Versus1. DELHI JAL BOARDTHROUGH ITS CHAIRMANROOM NO. 306, 3RD FLOOR,VARUNALYA, PHASE-IIJHANDEWALAN, KAROL BAGH,NEW DELHI-11000520:31:19 1 KUMAR KAURAV2. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHITHROUGH-CHIEF SECRETARYDELHI 110054 ....RESPONDENTS(Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Ms. Pulak Gupta and Ms. Payal Rajput,Advs.)------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % Rese...


May 29 2026

Jorawer Singh Mundy @ Jorawar Singh Mundy vs Union of India & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-29-2026

$~J* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment pronounced on: 29.05.2026 + W.P.(C) 1021/2016, CM APPL. 4449/2016 &4263/2017 LAKSH VIR SINGH YADAV .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 3918/2021, CM APPL. 19941/2021JORAWER SINGH MUNDY @ JORAWAR SINGH MUNDY.....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 6790/2021, CM APPL. 21682/2024 ASHUTOSH KAUSHIK .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 8209/2021 SHEKHAR SINGH JADAUN .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 8557/2021 JAIDEEP MIRCHANDANI & ANR. .....PetitionersversusUNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATION AND IT & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 12620/2021 MOHAMMED UMAR ASHRAFI .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH MINISTRY OF INFORMATIONAND BROADCASTING & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 11553/2021, CM APPL. 35651/2021 ATUL DIKSHIT .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA & OR...


May 29 2026

Sahil Luthra vs M/S Krishna Estate & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-29-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on : 02.04.2026% Pronounced on : 29.05.2026Uploaded on : 29.05.2026+ FAO 79/2026 & CM APPL.15713/2026KARAN LUTHRA NOW DECEASED .....Appellant Through: Mr. Rajesh Yadav, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajiv Dewan, Mr. Ravnak Gupta, and Mr. Dhananjay Mehlawat, Advocates.versusM S KRISHNA ESTATE & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. J. Sai Deepak, Senior Advocate with Mr. Gaurav Jain, Mr. Atul Malhotra, Ms. Karuna Sharma, Mr. Anant Raj Kannojiya, Mr. Pramendra Singh, Mr. Devesh Chauhan, Ms. Akriti Chaturvedi, and Ms. Prerna Tiwari, Advocates for Respondent No. 2. Mr. Gandharv Anand and Mr. Brian Bosses, Advocates for Respondent No. 3. Mr. Rajesh Kumar Agnihotri, Advocate for GNCTD/Respondent Nos. 4 and 5.+ FAO 102/2026, CM APPL. 22182/2026, CM APPL. 33818/2026 and CM APPL. 33820/2026Reserved on : 26.05.2026FAO 79/2026 & FAO 102/2026 Page 1 of 11 SAHIL LUTHRA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Jayant Bhush...


May 29 2026

Mithlesh vs Khursheed Alam

Court: Delhi Orders

Decided on: May-29-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 579/2026 MITHLESH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil Dixit, Adv. (through v/c)versusKHURSHEED ALAM .....Respondent Through: Ms. Tanvi Madan, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 29.05.20261. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the presentpetition.2. The same is accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.SACHIN DATTA, JMAY 29, 2026/clThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/06/2026 at 13:01:15...


May 29 2026

Vision College of Teachers Training vs National Council for Teacher Ed ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-29-2026

$~71,28-30,32,33,50,57,59,64,65,68,70-73,75,85-87,89-96,106,108,110,124,125* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 29.05.2026+ W.P.(C) 4860/2026& CM APPL. 23901/2026, CM APPL.23902/2026 VISION COLLEGE OF TEACHERS TRAINING .....Petitioner Mr. Mayank Manish Adv Mr. Ravi Kant Adv Mr. Vineet Upadhyay Adv Mr. Ayish Aanand Adv Mr. Jayant Dubey Adv NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 7747/2026 GYAYAK T.T. COLLEGE .....Petitioner + W.P.(C) 7767/2026 HUKUM CHAND NOBLE INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY .....Petitioner Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Ms. Priti Kumari & Mr.Digitally Signed W.P.(C) 4860/2026 and connected matters Page 1 of 24Pankaj Kumar Ray, Advs. + W.P.(C) 7771/2026 RAJASTHAN T.T. COLLEGE .....Petitioner NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR + W.P.(C) 7791/2026 GANPATI MAHILA MAHAVIDHYALAYA .....Petitioner + W.P.(C) 7799/2026 RAMSWAROOP AGRAWAL TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE .....PetitionerDigitally Signed W.P.(C) 4860...


May 29 2026

Sk vs Union of India & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-29-2026

$~J* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment pronounced on: 29.05.2026 + W.P.(C) 1021/2016, CM APPL. 4449/2016 &4263/2017 LAKSH VIR SINGH YADAV .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 3918/2021, CM APPL. 19941/2021 JORAWER SINGH MUNDY @ JORAWAR SINGH MUNDY .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 6790/2021, CM APPL. 21682/2024 ASHUTOSH KAUSHIK .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 8209/2021 SHEKHAR SINGH JADAUN .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 8557/2021 JAIDEEP MIRCHANDANI & ANR. .....PetitionersversusUNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATION AND IT & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 12620/2021 MOHAMMED UMAR ASHRAFI .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND BROADCASTING & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 11553/2021, CM APPL. 35651/2021 ATUL DIKSHIT .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA &...


May 29 2026

National Highways Authority of India vs Roadway Solution India Pvt. Lt ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-29-2026

$~32 & 33* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 29.05.2026 + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 321/2026+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 322/2026CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHANSHANKARJUDGEMENT (Oral)1. The present Petitions have been filed under Section 29-A(5) ofthe Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19961 seeking the extension of the mandate of the learned Sole Arbitrator.Act O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 321/2026 & connected matter Page 1 of 42. The material on record indicates that the parties entered intotwo Contracts dated 25.10.2013 and 18.12.20132 for short term improvement and routine maintenance for two distinct sections of NH-4. The said Contracts contain an identical dispute resolutionclause, being Clause 25 of both the Contracts, which contemplates adjudication of disputes arising from the Contracts by way of Arbitration.3. Subsequently, disputes arose between the parties, and theRespondent filed two Petitions under Secti...


May 29 2026

Gautam Kapoor vs Mrs Aaina Kapoor

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-29-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 09.03.2026Pronounced on: 29.05.2026+ MAT.APP.(F.C.) 109/2023 & CM Nos. 21038/2023,GAUTAM KAPOOR .....Appellant Through: Mr. DK Malhotra, Mr. Rajesh Malhotra, Mr. Reymon Singh, Ms. Mahima, Mr. Aditya, Advs.versusMRS AAINA KAPOOR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ravi Sikri, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Gaurav, Mr. Deepak Yadav, Mr. Nishant, Mr. Rohit, Mr. Vaibhav, Advs. with respondent in person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARYHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGARJUDGMENT1. The present appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act,MAT.APP.(F.C.) 109/2023 Page 1 of 241984 read with Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter HMA) assails the common order dated 15.02.2023 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Rohini in HMA No. 219/2019 and MT. Case No. 365/2018, whereby the appellant- husband has been directed to pay pendente lite/interim maintenance of Rs. 1,00,000/- per month, apportione...


May 29 2026

Alcon Company Pvt Ltd vs Khim Ram

Court: Delhi Orders

Decided on: May-29-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3604/2025, CM APPL.16861/2025, 16862/2025 ALCON COMPANY PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Bhupesh Narula, Ms. Rinku Narula, Ms. Poonam Nagpal, Mr. Anugrah Ekka and Mr. Kanishk Taneja, Advocates.versusKHIM RAM .....Respondent Through: Mr. Gaurav Parashar, Advocate (through VC).CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 29.05.2026CM APPL. 37834/2026 (seeking disposal of WPC in terms of settlement agreement dated 14-05-2026)1. By way of this application, it is brought out that a settlementagreement has been executed between the parties. The said agreement dated 14.05.2026 has been placed on record. It is submitted that all outstanding disputes between the parties have been resolved in terms thereof.2. Accordingly, W.P.(C) 3604/2025, as also the pending applications,are disposed of in terms of the settlement agreement. The parties shall remain bound in terms thereof.3. As contemplated in the settlement agr...


May 29 2026

Hema Kumari vs Sh Prashant Goyal & Anr.

Court: Delhi Orders

Decided on: May-29-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 771/2026 HEMA KUMARI .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Archana Gaur, Adv. (DHCLSC), Ms. Ridhima Gaur and Mr. Deepu Kumar, Advs.versusSH PRASHANT GOYAL & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Abhinav Singh, Advocate along with Mr. Harjeet Singh Panwar, Food Supply Officer for GNCTD.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 29.05.2026 The matter is taken up today as 28.05.2026 was declared a holiday on account of Id-ul-Zuha (Bakrid).1. Mr. Harjeet Singh Panwar, Food Supply Officer (FSO), is present inCourt on behalf of the respondent. He makes a categorical statement that upon the petitioner submitting the requisite Income Certificate, the Ration- Card shall be issued to the petitioner immediately thereafter.2. The said statement is taken on record.3. Binding the respondent to the aforesaid statement, the present petition is disposed of.4. List for reporting compliance on 07.09.2026.5. It is made clear that in case of non-comp...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial