Delhi Court May 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Akash Kumar vs Narcotics Control Bureau
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2026
$~P-2* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 14.05.2026 Pronounced on:30.05.2026 Uploaded on: 30.05.2026+ BAIL APPLN. 601/2026AKASH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar, Advocate.versusNARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU .....Respondent Through: Mr. Arun Khatri, SSC with Ms.Shelly Dixit, Mr. P. Singh, Advocates.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANJUDGMENT1. By way of the present application under Section 483 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS], the applicant seeks regular bail in connection with NCB Crime No. VIII/09/DZU/2024, registered under Sections 8(c)/18(b)/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [the NDPS Act].2. I have heard Mr. Pramod Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant,and Mr. Arun Khatri, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respondent Narcotics Control Bureau. The prosecution has placed on record a status report dated 24.02.2026.A. PROSECUTION CASE3. The prosecution case, as it emerges from t...
Bhim Singh vs State (N.C.T of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 26.05.2026Judgment pronounced on: 30.05.2026Judgment uploaded on: 30.05.2026+ BAIL APPLN. 1270/2026 BHIM SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. S.K. Sharma, Mr. Yogender Kumar and Mr. Tejas Singh, Advocates.versusSTATE (N.C.T OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for State.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAJUDGMENTDR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J1. By way of the present application, the applicant seeks grant ofregular bail in case arising out of FIR bearing no. 240/2024, registered at Police Station Alipur, Delhi for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 304B/302/498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter IPC).2. Briefly stated, the facts of the present case are that on25.03.2024, pursuant to receipt of DD no. 20A, SI Rajkumar hadBAIL APPLN. 1270/2026 Page 1 of 8 reached the place of incident in Bakhtawarpur, Alipur, Delhi, where a woman, Aarti, was found lying i...
Nnaka Christian Ilechukwu vs Ncb
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2026
$~P-1* IN THE HIGH COURTOF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 18.05.2026Pronounced on:30.05.2026Uploaded on:30.05.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 1530/2026 NNAKA CHRISTIAN ILECHUKWU .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Md. Suza Faisal, Advocate.versusNCB .....Respondent Through: Mr. Arun Khatri, SSC for NCB with Ms. Shelly Dixit, Mr. Pranarjeet Singh, Advocates.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANJUDGMENT1. By way of this application under Section 483 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner seeks grant of regular bail in connection with NCB Case No. VIII/67/DZU/2022, under Sections [NDPS Act], lodged at Narcotics Control Bureau, Delhi Zonal Unit.2. I have heard Mr. Md. Suza Faisal, learned counsel for thepetitioner, and Mr. Arun Khatri, learned Standing Counsel for respondent. The prosecution has placed on record a status report dated 08.05.2026. I. PROSECUTION CASE3. The prosecution case, as emerging from the material on record, is18:43:47 BAIL APPLN. 1530/2026 Page 1 ...
Trupti Rajendra Patil vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2026
$~P-3* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on:26.05.2026Pronounced on: 30.05.2026Uploaded on:30.05.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 1661/2026 TRUPTI RAJENDRA PATIL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rahul Sharma, Mr. Shivanshu Yadav, Mr. Manninder Singh and Mr. Ujjwal Pandey, Advocates.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Puneett Singhal, SPP along with Ms Yashi Pandey, Advocate. IO/ACO Sunil.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANJUDGMENT1. By way of this application under Section 483 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS], the petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with C.No. VIII(AP)10/P&I/5480-D/Arrival/2025, registered at IGI Airport, New Delhi, under Sections 8, 20(b), 23 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [NDPS Act].2. I have heard Mr. Rahul Sharma, learned counsel for the petitionerand Mr. Puneett Singhal, learned Special Public Prosecutor for the State. A. PROSECUTION CASE3. The case of the pros...
M/S Us Advertising Agency Private Limited & Anr. vs M/S Hashbrown Syst ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 366/2025 M/S US ADVERTISING AGENCY PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. .....Plaintiff Through: Ms. Rashi Suri & Ms. Jasleen Kaur, Advs. (appeared through VC)versusM/S HASHBROWN SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. .....Defendant Through: Mr. Pranav Sarthi, Adv. (appeared through VC)CORAM:JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL) SH. SUMIT DALALORDER% 30.05.2026 I.A.No.1029/2026 (under Section 151 CPC filed on behalf of defendants seeking condonation of delay in refiling IA No.1028/2026)1. In view of the averments made in the captioned IA, the application is allowed and delay in filing application bearing IA No.1028/226 is condoned.2. IA stands disposed of. I.A.No.1028/2026 (under Order I Rule 10 CPC filed on behalf of defendant no.2 to 4 seeking their deletion)3. By this order, I shall decide I.A. No. 1028/2026 filed on behalf of Defendant Nos. 2 to 4 under Order I Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking their deletion from the array ...
Raghuraj Pratap Singh vs Bhanvi Kumari Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 18.03.2026Judgment pronounced on: 30.05.2026Judgment uploaded on: 30.05.2026+ CRL.M.C. 7205/2024, CRL.M.A. 27517/2024, CRL.M.A. RAGHURAJ PRATAP SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Dhruv Gupta and Mr. Anubhav Garg, AdvocatesversusBHANVI KUMARI SINGH .....Respondent Through: Mr. Arvind Kumar Shukla, Ms. Surbhi Khanna, Ms. Neena Shukla and Mr. Kushagra Sinha, AdvocatesCORAM:HONBLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAJUDGMENTIndex to the JudgmentFACTUAL BACKGROUND .................................................................. 2 RIVAL CONTENTIONS ...................................................................... 4 ANALYSIS & FINDINGS ..................................................................... 8 A. Scheme of PWDV Act ................................................................................ 8 B. Nature of Remedies under PWDV Act.................................................. 10 C. Offence under...
Dinesh Gupta vs Directorate of Enforcement
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 26.05.2026Judgment pronounced on: 30.05.2026Judgment uploaded on: 30.05.2026+ BAIL APPLN. 4709/2025 DINESH GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. N. Hariharan and Mr. Madhav Khurana, Senior Advocates with Mr. Yash Varma, Ms. Vani Gupta, Mr. Raghav Bakshi, Mr. Arjan Mandla, Mr. Teeksh Singhal, Ms. Deeparghya Datta, Mr. Aman Akhthar, Ms. Vasundhara N., Ms. Vasundhara Raj Tyagi, Ms. Punya Rekha Angara and Ms. Sana Singh, AdvocatesversusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT .....Respondent Through: Mr. Vivek Gurnani, Panel Counsel for ED with Mr. Kanishk Maurya, AdvocateCORAM:HONBLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAJUDGMENTDR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J1. By way of this application, the applicant seeks grant of regular bail in case arising out of CT Case No. 40/2025, titled Directorate of BAIL APPLN. 4709/2025 Page 1 of 28 Enforcement vs. Dinesh Gupta & Ors., arising out of ECIR/HIU- Laundering Act, 2002 [hereafter PMLA]. FACTUAL BACKG...
Yusuf Aajam vs State Govt of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2026
$~J-* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of Decision: 30th May, 2026 + BAIL APPLN. 4822/2025 & CRL.M.A. 37052/2025, CRL.M.A. YUSUF AAJAM .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Akshay Bhandari, Ms. Megha Saroa, Mr. Kushal Kumar, Mr. Janak Raj Ambavat and Mr. Anmol, Advocates.versusSTATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Shubhi Gupta, APP for the State. HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIJ U D G M E N TANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J.By way of the present petition filed under section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioner seeks regular bail in case FIR No.258/2023 dated 06.10.2023 under sections 22/29 of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) at P.S.: Special Cell, Delhi.2. At the outset Mr. Akshay Bhandari, learned counsel for the petitionerhas explained that his earlier regular bail petition bearing BAIL APPLN. No.1526/2025 was dismissed as withdrawn, since the petitioner wanted to file a fresh bail petition wit...
Pushpa Pal vs M/S Orient Craft Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on : 04.05.2026Pronounced on : 30.05.2026Uploaded on : 01.06.2026 + W.P.(C) 13060/2018 SEEMA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Vagisha Kochar and Mr. Sharath Sampath, Advocates.versusORIENT CRAFT LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Gulshan Chawla, Ms. Kanupriya Chawla and Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 13067/2018 PUSHPA PAL .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Vagisha Kochar and Mr. Sharath Sampath, Advocates.versusM/S ORIENT CRAFT LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Gulshan Chawla, Ms. Kanupriya Chawla and Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIJUDGMENT1. By way of the present petitions, the petitioners/workwomen have assailed the award dated 23.07.2018, whereby the Labour Court dismissed W.P.(C) 13060/2018 & W.P.(C) 13067/2018 Page 1 of 13 their claims/references and denied them the reliefs sought against the common respondent/management.2. Briefly stated, as per their respective claim app...
Seema vs Orient Craft Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on : 04.05.2026Pronounced on : 30.05.2026Uploaded on : 01.06.2026 + W.P.(C) 13060/2018 SEEMA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Vagisha Kochar and Mr. Sharath Sampath, Advocates.versusORIENT CRAFT LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Gulshan Chawla, Ms. Kanupriya Chawla and Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 13067/2018 PUSHPA PAL .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Vagisha Kochar and Mr. Sharath Sampath, Advocates.versusM/S ORIENT CRAFT LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Gulshan Chawla, Ms. Kanupriya Chawla and Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIJUDGMENT1. By way of the present petitions, the petitioners/workwomen have assailed the award dated 23.07.2018, whereby the Labour Court dismissed W.P.(C) 13060/2018 & W.P.(C) 13067/2018 Page 1 of 13 their claims/references and denied them the reliefs sought against the common respondent/management.2. Briefly stated, as per their respective claim app...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »