Delhi Court April 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shri Savitur Prasad vs Union of India
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 7865/2018, CM APPL. 30164/2018 and CM APPL. 24442/2019 SHRI SAVITUR PRASAD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, Mr. Kunal Sachdeva, Mr. Lakshay Yadav and Mr. Naveen Sharma, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, SPC with Mr. Sunil, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 01.04.20261. Learned counsel representing the Petitioner submits that the present Writ Petition is rendered infructuous as the Petitioner has been exonerated in the disciplinary enquiry.2. Order accordingly.ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.AMIT MAHAJAN, J.APRIL 01, 2026/sp/shah This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/04/2026 at 11:15:19...
Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation vs Rajender Singh & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on : 19th February 2026Pronounced on : 01st April 2026Uploaded on : 02nd April 2026 + MAC.APP. 1165/2013 UTTAR PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION. .....Appellant Through: Mr. Shadab Khan, Advocate.versusRAJENDER SINGH & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Jatinder Kumar, Advocate for R-1 to 4. + MAC.APP. 171/2014 RAJENDER SINGH YADAV & ORS .....Appellants Through: Mr. Jatinder Kumar, Advocate for A-1 to 4.versusNAWAB SINGH & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shadab Khan, Advocate for R-2.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYALJUDGMENTANISH DAYAL, J.1. These are cross appeals filed by owner of offending vehicle, Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (UPSRTC) in MAC APP (LRs) of deceased/Sachin Yadav (hereinafter, claimants) in MAC KUMAR CHOUDHARY MAC.APP. 1165/2013 & MAC. APP 171/2014 Page 1 of 23APP. 171/2014. Owner/UPSRTC seeks to assail the impugned award dated 29th October 2013 passed by Motor Accide...
Vibgyor Info Private Limited vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 19/2026 with CM APPL. 35/2026 VIBGYOR INFO PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Jitender Mehta, Mr. Lalit Kumar, Mr. Shivam Pahal, Mr. Abhinav Kumar and Mr. Avaneesh Singh, Advocates (through VC).versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vikrant Nitesh Goyal, Ms. Laavanya Kaushik, Mr. Yash Basoya and Mr. Inderpreet Singh, Advocates for UoI.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 01.04.20261. The present writ petition has been filed seeking extension of the license period as has been granted to the petitioner in W.P. 7323/2025 videjudgment dated 26th May, 2025, to operate the catering stalls allotted infavour of the petitioner at Anand Vihar Terminal Railway Station for a period of five (5) years, from 27th July, 2021 to 26th July, 2026.2. A similar batch of petitions have been dismissed by this Court videjudgment dated 25th February, 2026, in W.P.(C) 18000/2025 titled VandanaMishra v. Union ...
Raju vs the State Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 31/2026 RAJU .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Hina Mahajan, Mr. Divyanshu Kumar, Mr. Arundeep Gahlot, Advs.versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Mr. Abhinav Kr. Arya, Mr. Aryan Sachdeva, Advs. and SI Narendra Kumar, PS Maidan Garhi for State. Mr. Salim Malik, Ms. Anjana Rani, Mr. Shavana, Advs. for R-5.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJAORDER% 01.04.2026 W.P.(CRL) 31/20261. This petition has been filed under Article 226 of theConstitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking issuance of a Writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus for production of the minor daughter of the petitioner, Ms. XXX.2. Ms. XXX has appeared before us in person. Admittedly, she is still a minor, however, she states that she has married the respondent no. 5, who is claimed to be a major. We have inter...
Brij Lal and Sons vs Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision : 01.04.2026 + FAO(OS) (COMM) 34/2026 BRIJ LAL AND SONS .....Appellant Through: Mr. Tilak Raj Gogia, Appellant in person.versusUNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Ms. Ankita Bhadouriya and Mr. Fajallu Rehman, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAV. KAMESWAR RAO, J. (ORAL) CM APPL. 20415/2026 (Early Hearing)1. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed.2. The application is disposed of. FAO(OS) (COMM) 34/2026, CM APPL. 11726/20263. This Intra-Court appeal has been filed challenging the order dated11.11.2025 passed in OMP (Comm.) No. 258/2020 titled as M/s Brijlal & Sons v. Union of India whereby the learned Single Judge has dismissed the application filed by the petitioner wherein the petitioner has sought cost of Signed By:PRADEEP FAO(OS)(COMM) 34/2026 Page 1 of 3 the proceedings.4. The learned Single Judge has ...
Union of India and Ors. vs 684783 Ex Hfo Brij Kishor Tripathi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 01.04.2026 + W.P.(C) 4187/2026 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Arunima Dwivedi CGSC with Ms. Swati Jhunjhunwala, Ms. Monalisha Pradhan, Advs. Sgt Padam Charan IAF.versus684783 EX HFO BRIJ KISHOR TRIPATHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Kr. Gupta, Ms. Esha Mehrotra and Ms. Devangana Sharma, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAMANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J. (ORAL) CM APPL. 20450/20261. Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 4187/2026 & CM APPL. 20449/20263. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia against the order dated 11.04.2023 [impugned order] passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal Principal Bench, New Delhi [Tribunal] in Original Application [O.A.] No. 1265 of 2021 titled as (684783) EX HFO Brij Kishor Tripathi v. Union of India ...
Sameer K vs Superintendent of Tihar Jail & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THEHIGH COURTOF DELHIAT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1047/2026, CRL.M.A. 9810/2026&CRL.M.A. 9811/2026 SAMEER K .....Petitioner Through: Mr Deepak Prakash, Adv. (through VC)versusSUPERINTENDENT OF TIHAR JAIL & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Manisha Agarwal Narain, CGSC and Mr. Ishkaran Bhandari, CGSC with Mr. Nipun Jain, Mr. Piyush Yadav and Mr. Harsh, Advs. for R-1,3 and 4 Mr. Ishkaran Singh Bhandari, CGSC with Mr. Piyush Yadav, Mr. Harsh Vardhan Jha, Advs. Ms. Radhika Bishwajit Dubey, CGSC with Ms. Rupali Sinha, GP, Ms. Gurleen Kaur Waraich, Mr. Kritarth Upadhyay and Mr. Amulya Dev Mishra, Advs. for DHC.CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAORDER% 01.04.20261. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. We may note that the instant petition cannot be entertained as a publicinterest litigation petition for the reason that on one hand, certain prayers have been made which are general in nature and on the other hand, personal grievances in relation to c...
Anil Kumar Kaushik vs Iffco Tokio General Ins Co Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on : 16th January 2026Pronounced on : 1st April 2026Uploaded on : 02nd April 2026 + MAC.APP. 814/2013 IFFCO TOKIO GEN. INS. CO. LTD .....Appellant Through: Mr. Brijesh Bagga Advocate & Ms. Mouli Sharma, Advs.versusSH ANIL KUMAR KAUSHIK & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate with Mr. Ritik Singh, Advocate for R- 1. Mr. Syed Hasan Isfahani & Uday Singh Advocate for Respondent No.2 + MAC.APP. 288/2017 ANIL KUMAR KAUSHIK .....Appellant Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate with Mr. Ritik Singh, Advocate.versusIFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INS CO LTD & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Brijesh Bagga Advocate & Ms. Mouli Sharma, Advs. Mr. Syed Hasan Isfahani & Uday Singh Advocate for Respondent No.2CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYALJUDGMENT%ANISH DAYAL, J.1. These are cross appeals being MAC APP. 814/2013 filed by Insurance Company and MAC APP. 288/2017 filed by claimant for KUMAR CHOUDHARY...
Abhishek vs Sangeeta
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 1575/2010 ABHISHEK .....PetitionerversusSANGEETA .....RespondentCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMAORDER% 01.04.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,1950 seeks the following prayers: - It is, therefore, most humbly prayed that the Honble Court may be pleased to set aside the impugned order dated 30.07.2010, passed by the Court of Ms. Seema Maini, A.D.J. Tis Hazari, Delhi,in H.M.A. Case No.215/2009 titled as Smt. Sangeeta VersusAbhishek in view of above facts and submissions, in the interest of justice. Any other order[s] or direction[s] which the Honble Court deems fit and proper may also be awarded in favour of appellants and against the respondent.3. A perusal of the record would reflect that no notice had been issued to the respondent in the present petition and repeated adjournments had been taken by the learned counsel for the pet...
K M Karthik vs Union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4212/2026 K M KARTHIK .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhishek Yadav, Ms. Komal Bharti and Mr. Tushar Bagga, Advs,versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Neha Rastogi SPC with Mr. Animesh Rastogi, Mr. Rajat Dubey, Ms. Kanchan Semwal, GPs.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 01.04.20261. The instant petition is for the following reliefs:a. Issue a writ in nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, to adjudicate the Petitioner's RTI related 11.10.2022 and CIC order dated 27.03.2024 and 15.04.2025. b. Issue a writ, order, or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper to ensure that a fair, just and unbiased adjudication with respect to complaint instituted by the Petitioner before the Respondent No.2 c. Pass any other writ, order, or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.2. The petitioner on 11.10.2022...
- ‹ Prev
- 511
- 512
- 513
- 514
- 515
- 516
- 517
- 518
- 519
- 521
- Next ›
- Last »