Delhi Court April 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Yogesh Sharma vs State Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 4605/2025 YOGESH SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sudhir Naagar and Mr. Akhil Gusain, AdvocatesversusSTATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Priyanka Dalal, APP for State SI Hemant Kumar, PS Jafrabad, DelhiCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 01.04.20261. At the very outset, learned counsel for applicant, without prejudice to his rights and contentions, seeks to withdraw the present application.2. Application is accordingly disposed of as not pressed.3. All rights and contentions of the parties are reserved. MANOJ JAIN, J APRIL 1, 2026/dr/syThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/04/2026 at 10:08:53...
Arun Kumar vs the State Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 10072/2024 & CRL.M.A. 38622/2024 ARUN KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Mahima Aggarwal, Advocate with petitioner in person (through VC).versusTHE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP for the State with SI Manish. Mr. Sanjeet Kr. Trivedi and Ms. Reema, Advocates for R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 01.04.20261. By way of the present petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of theFIR bearing No. 297/2019, registered at Police Station Bhajanpura, Delhi, for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 135/150 of the Electricity Act, 2003.2. Issue notice. The learned APP accepts notice on behalf of the State.3. The petitioner is present before this Court and has been identified by his counsel and Investigating Officer (IO) concerned, Police Station, Bhajanpura, Delhi.4. Brief facts of the case are that due to issues regarding the payment...
Raju Alias Ashok Alias Chandrika Prasad Pal vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 4597/2025 RAJU ALIAS ASHOK ALIAS CHANDRIKA PRASAD PAL .....Petitioner Through:versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP along with Mr. Abhimanyu Arya, Adv. Insp Satish, PS RanholaCORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 01.04.20261. The matter was passed over at the first call at the instance of the applicant. The applicant remains unrepresented even on the second call. The last order dated 16.03.2026 records the same position on that date as well.2. In these circumstances, the application is dismissed in default.3. Status report is handed up in Court and is taken on record. PRATEEK JALAN, J APRIL 1, 2026 Tg/JM/This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/04/2026 at 10:11:05...
United India Insurance Company Limited vs Kamlesh Alias Kamlesh Kumar ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ FAO 89/2026 & CM APPLs.18231-34/2026 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED .....Appellant Through: Mr.Animesh Sinha and Mr.Shivang Singhal, AdvocatesversusKAMLESH ALIAS KAMLESH KUMAR & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr.R.K. Nain, Mr.Daksh Nain, Mr.Chandan Prajapati, Advocates for respondent No.1CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIORDER% 01.04.2026 CM Appl.18232/20261. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The present application is disposed of. CM Appls.18233-34/20261. These applications have been filed on behalf of the appellant seeking condonation of delay. There is a delay of 44 days in filing and 50 days in re-filing the appeal.2. Learned counsel for the respondent/non-applicant submits that he has no objection if the delay is condoned.3. In view thereof, and for the reasons stated in the applications, the delay in filing and re-filing the appeal is condoned.4. The applications are disposed of. FAO 89/2026 &...
Rajkumar Tulsawani vs Union of India and Others
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4150/2026, CM APPL. 20286/2026 & CM APPL. RAJKUMAR TULSAWANI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Dvijendra Kumar Pandey, Adv.versusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Arti Bansal CGSC-UOI, Ms. Shruti Goel, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 01.04.20261. The present Writ Petition is filed against the Order dated 01.10.2024 (hereafter impugned order) passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi in O.A. No. 527/2021.2. The Petitioner came to the learned Tribunal with a prayer that he has been wrongly denied promotion.3. During the pendency of the OA, the Petitioner was promoted vide order dated 05.07.2021. Taking note of the same, the OA filed by the Petitioner was disposed of.4. The Petitioner now prays that he should have been promoted from the year 2019.5. Since a fresh order has been passed on 05.07.2021, the Petiti...
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -10 vs Dabur Invest Corp.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 271/2026 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -10 .....Appellant Through: Mr. Gaurav Gupta, SSC, Mr. Shivendra Singh, Mr. Yojit Pareek, JSCs, Mr. Surya Jindal, Adv.versusDABUR INVEST CORP. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Kaushik, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARORDER% 01.04.2026 CM APPL. 20652/2026 (delay in re-filing)1. Present application has been filed by the applicant-appellant seeking condonation of delay of 191 days in re-filing the instant appeal.2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. Delay of 191 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned.3. Application stands disposed of. CM APPL. 20651/2026 (delay in filing)4. Present application has been filed by the applicant-appellant seeking condonation of delay of 172 days in filing the instant appeal.5. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. Delay of 172 days in filing the appeal is condoned...
Dr Naveen Chaudhari vs Central Bureau of Investigation & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 4183/2025 DR NAVEEN CHAUDHARI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rishab Gupta, Advocate via video-conferencing.versusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rajni Gupta, SPP for CBI with Insp. T.N. Sharma. Mr. Ashish Mehta, Adv. for R2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 01.04.2026 Mr. Rishab Gupta, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed-of as withdrawn. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of. ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J APRIL 1, 2026 V.Rawat This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/04/2026 at 12:50:09...
Poonawalla Fincorp Limited vs Trucap Finance Limited Through Its Direc ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 530/2025 POONAWALLA FINCORP LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Joginder Sukhija, Ms. Harshita Sukhija and Mr. Aashrit, Advs.versusTRUCAP FINANCE LIMITED THROUGH ITS DIRECTORS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Utkarsh Joshi, Mr. Sharan Mukherji, Mr. Sudarshana Bandyopadhyay, Mr. Vinay Thakur and Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJANORDER% 01.04.20261. The present petition has been filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [in short, Act] seeking interim measures.2. The disputes having arisen between the parties under the CreditFacility-cum-Hypothecation Agreements dated 30.09.2023, 28.05.2024 and 19.09.2024 [hereinafter referred to as Credit Facility Agreements], the petitioner invoked arbitration vide Loan Recall Notice dated 24.10.2025.3. Clause 24.2 of the Credit Facility Agreements provides for resolutionof disputes by a Sole Arbitrator and reads thus: 24.2 All claims,...
R Krishnamurthy and Co vs Atindra Prasad Adhikari, Proprietor Skb Infr ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA(COMM) 721/2025 & CM APPL. 81903/2025 R KRISHNAMURTHY AND CO .....Appellant Through: Mr. Mikhil Vij, Adv.versusATINDRA PRASAD ADHIKARI, PROPRIETOR SKB INFRATECH .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAINORDER% 01.04.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present appeal arises out of the impugned order and decree dated18th October, 2025 in CS(COMM) 580/2022 passed by Ld. District Judge, (Commercial-01), Saket Courts,New Delhi by which Respondent/Plaintiffs suit for recovery has been decreed in the following terms: Vide separate detailed judgment announced in the open court today, instant suit is decreed with cost in favour of plaintiff and against the defendant for an amount of Rs. 95,19,601/- (Rs. Ninety Five Lacs Nineteen Thousand Six Hundred and One Only) along with pendente lite and future interest @ 12% per annum.3. Mr. Mikhil Vij, ld. Counsel appearing for the Appe...
Union of India & Ors vs Padma Jaiswal Ias (Agmut:2003)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 12.02.2026Judgment pronounced on: 01.04.2026Judgment uploaded on: 01.04.2026+ W.P.(C) 6699/2018 UNION OF INDIA & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Mr. Sanjiv Kumar Saxena, Mr. Mukesh Kumar Tiwari, Mr. Nishank Tripathi, Ms. Harshita Sukhija, Ms. Reba Jain Mishra, Ms. Poonam Shukla, Ms Rishika Agrawal and Ms. Priya Tyagi, Advs.versusPADMA JAISWAL IAS (AGMUT:2003) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Nidhesh Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Tarun Gupta, Adv. + W.P.(C) 12072/2018, CM APPL. 46771/2018 and CM APPL. SH. SANJAY PRATAP SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. A. K. Thakur, Mr. Rishi Raj, Mr. Sujeet Kumar and Mr. Ningthem Oinam, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY .....Respondent Through: Ms. Nidhi Raman, CGSC with Mr. Akash Mishra and Mr. Arnav Mittal, Advs. for UOI + W.P.(C) 12083/2018, CM APPL. 14344/2019 and CM APPL. SH. SANJAY PRATAP SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. A. K....
- ‹ Prev
- 511
- 512
- 513
- 514
- 515
- 516
- 517
- 518
- 520
- 521
- Next ›
- Last »