Delhi Court April 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vijyant Agarwal & Anr. vs M/S Bptp Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 1282/2025 VIJYANT AGARWAL & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Himanshu Swami, Adv.versusM/S BPTP LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Kaushik Poddar and Mr. Akash Dalal, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHANSHANKARORDER% 01.04.20261. The present Petition, filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [Act], seeks appointment of an Arbitrator for adjudication of the disputes inter se the parties.2. Learned counsel appearing for the parties are ad idem that an Appeal under Section 37 of the Act, being FAO (COMM) 257/2025, had been preferred by the Respondent herein, which came to bedecided by the Honble Division Bench of this Court vide Judgementdated 13.03.2026 [said Judgement].3. Learned counsel for the parties submit that by way of the saidJudgement, the Honble Division Bench has directed for appointment of an Arbitrator for de novo adjudication of disputes between the parties and ther...
Annu Dhawan Through Her Power of Attorney Sh Manu Dhawan vs Ajeet Sing ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 3417/2024 & CM APPL. 54791/2024 ANNU DHAWAN THROUGH HER POWER OF ATTORNEY SH MANU DHAWAN .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Isha Khanna, Ms. Ruchika Malik and Mr. Shivam Parashar, Advocates.versusAJEET SINGH .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 01.04.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the suit is pendingbefore the learned Trial Court for final arguments. It is further submitted that the petitioner does not wish to press the present petition and seeks leave to withdraw the same, with liberty to advance arguments before the learned Trial Court on the admissibility of the evidence of DW-3, at the stage of final arguments.3. Keeping in view of the submissions made by learned counsel for thepetitioner, the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as sought in accordance with law. Pending application(s...
Naresha Chauhan vs Ritesh Chopra & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
$~2 and 3* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 1754/2025 NARESHA CHAUHAN .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Beenashaw N. Soni, Mr. Saurabh Dev Karn Singh and Ms. Katyani Malhotra, Advocates.versusRITESH CHOPRA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shahid Ali, Mr.Sameer Tayyeb, Mr. Mohd. Salman, Mr. Nazar Hussain and Mr. Ahmed Saeed, Advocates for R1 with R1 in person. + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 350/2025 NARESHA CHAUHAN .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Beenashaw N. Soni, Mr. Saurabh Dev Karn Singh and Ms. Katyani Malhotra, Advocates.versusRITESH CHOPRA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shahid Ali, Mr.Sameer Tayyeb, Mr. Mohd. Salman, Mr. Nazar Hussain and Mr. Ahmed Saeed, Advocates for R1 with R1 in person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJANORDER% 01.04.2026 ARB.P. 1754/2025 and I.A. 26249/20251. By way of this petition filed under Section 11 (6) of the Arbitrationand Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter Act), petitioner seeks appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate t...
Pankaj Dhingra vs State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 12.03.2026Pronounced on: 01.04.2026+ W.P.(CRL) 2049/2022 & CRL.M.A. 17762/2022, CRL.M.A. AMAN KATHPAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Jai Anant Dehadrai, Ms.Srutee Priyadarshini, Ms.Bhavya Jain, AdvocatesversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Shadan Farasat, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Arkaprava Dass, Adv. for R-2. + W.P.(CRL) 3029/2024 & CRL.M.A. 29390/2024 PANKAJ DHINGRA .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Shadan Farasat, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Arkaprava Dass, Adv.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl.) for the State with SI Sandeep, P.S. Bindapur. Mr.Jai Anant Dehadrai, Ms.Srutee Priyadarshini, Ms.Bhavya Jain, Advocates for R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJADigitally Signed W.P.(CRL) 2049/2022 & W.P.(CRL) 3029/2024 Page 1 of 16JUDGMENTNAVIN CHAWLA, J.1. As the present petitions concern the custody of the ...
M/S a.K. and Company vs Govt. of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 13685/2025 M/S A.K. AND COMPANY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Counsel (Appearance not given.)versusGOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Raghvendra Upadhyay, Panel Counsel (GNCTD), Ms. Purnima Jain, Ms. Shivpa Taneja, Mr. Madhur, Advocates for R-1 to 3.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 01.04.20261. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that on account of subsequent development, the grievance sought to be raised, stands mitigated.2. In view thereof, the petition stands disposed of. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J APRIL 1, 2026 aksThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/04/2026 at 11:22:27...
Ankit Gaba vs the State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 3449/2025 & CRL.M.As. 26944/2025, 6119- ANKIT GABA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kanhaiya Singhal, Ms. Prasanna, Mr. Sarthak Gupta, Ms. Shatakshi Singh and Ms. Avantika Shankar, Advocates.versusTHE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP. SI Pushpa Punia. Mr. Samar Singh Kachwaha, Mr. Arsh Rampal, Mr. Gaurav Vashisth, Advocates for complainant.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 01.04.20261. By way of the present application under Section 483 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, the applicant seeks regular bail in connection with FIR No. 906/2021 dated 19.10.2021 registered at Police Station Binda Pur, District Dwarka, Delhi, under Sections 302/120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.2. After some arguments, Mr. Kanhaiya Singhal, learned counsel forthe applicant, seeks permission to withdraw this application, without prejudice to the rights and remedies available to the ...
Ashish @ Ashu vs the State G.N.C.T. of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 3543/2025 ASHISH @ ASHU .....Applicant Through: Mr. N.S. Dalal, Mr. Sourbh Tyagi, Ms. Rachna Dalal, Mr. Prateek Sharma, Ms. Urvashi Sharma, Advocates.versusTHE STATE G.N.C.T. OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP with Insp. Jaspal Singh. Mr. Jitesh Dev, brother of the deceased.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 01.04.20261. By way of this application under Section 483 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the applicant seeks grant of regular bail in connection with FIR No. 92/2024 dated 11.02.2024, registered at Police Station Burari, District North, New Delhi, under Sections 323/341 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [IPC]. I have heard Mr. N.S. Dalal, learned counsel for the applicant, and Mr. Hitesh Vali, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Mr. Jitesh Dev, the brother of the deceased, is also present in Court, and has supported the submissions made by Mr. Vali.2. The prose...
Desalegn Atnafu Abeba vs Narcotics Control Bureau
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 01.04.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 4445/2025 & CRL.M.(BAIL) 2315/2025 DESALEGN ATNAFU ABEBE .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Arshiya Ghose, Advocate.versusNARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU .....Respondent Through: Mr. Arun Khatri, SSC with Ms. Shelly Dixit, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL)1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case Crime No. VIII/74/DZU/2022 of Police Station NCB DZU, RK Puram for offence under Section 8/21/23/29 NDPS Act.1.1 This bail application came up for the first hearing on 20.11.2025 before the predecessor bench and thereafter continued getting adjourned before different benches. Along with 179 such old pending bail applications, this application also was transferred to this bench.1.2 Today is the first hearing before me. BAIL APPLN. 4445/2025 Page 1 of 4 pages GIRISH 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec4 5569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, Signature Not Verified ou=HIGH COU...
Paramjeet Kumar vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 3961/2025 PARAMJEET KUMAR ..... Applicant Through: Mr. Kartik Kumar and Mr. Anil Malik, Advs.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Raghuinder Verma, APP with Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh and Mr. Dinesh Kumar, Advs. Mr. Aman Usman, Adv. SI Habib Khan, ER-I, Crime Branch.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 01.04.20261. After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant seeks leave to withdraw the present bail application with liberty to file the same afresh before the learned Trial Court.2. As such, the present bail application, is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.SAURABH BANERJEE, J.APRIL 01, 2026/So This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/04/2026 at 10:09:14...
Manjeet Singh vs Yogita
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.REV.P.(MAT.) 92/2024 MANJEET SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Mausmi Mishra, Mr. Davish Saifi, Advs.versusYOGITA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Shubhendu Saxena, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 01.04.20261. In view of the change(s) in circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition with liberty to take appropriate remedies, as available, in accordance with law.2. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed with liberty as prayed for.SAURABH BANERJEE, J.APRIL 01, 2026/bh This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/04/2026 at 10:39:56...
- ‹ Prev
- 511
- 512
- 513
- 514
- 515
- 516
- 518
- 519
- 520
- 521
- Next ›
- Last »