Delhi Court April 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ranjit Kaur vs State N.C.T. of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on: 12th January, 2026 Pronounced on:01st April, 2026 + W.P.(CRL) 1622/2021 & CRL.M.A. 13581/2021 RANJIT KAUR W/o Sh. S.S. Chawla, R/o A-8/40, 2nd Floor, Rana Pratap Singh, New Delhi. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. N. Hariharan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, Ms. Urvashi Sharma and Mr. Vinayak Gautam Advocates.versus1. STATE N.C.T. OF DELHI2. DR. NEELAMProfessor, Hindi Department Laxmi Bai College, DU, Delhi ....Respondents Through: Ms. Rupali Bandhopadhya, ASC for State with ACP Garima Tiwari, Insp. Yashwant and SI Sonal Raj, P.S.: Bharat Nagar. Ms. Pooja Roy, Advocate for R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAJ U D G M E N TNEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.1. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C.) has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner, Ranjit Kaur seekingW.P.(CRL) 1622/2021 Page 1 of 19...
Sh. Chander Bose vs Sh. Rakesh Chahar
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
$~12 & 13* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA 800/2023, CM APPL. 50215/2023 SH. CHANDER BOSE .....Appellant Through: NoneversusSH. RAKESH CHAHAR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sagar Sehrawat, Advocate RFA 815/2023, CM APPL. 51366-51367/2023 SH. CHANDER BOSE .....Appellant Through: NoneversusSH. DHARAMVIR SINGH .....Respondent Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 01.04.20261. None is present on behalf of the Appellant nor was anyone present on the last date.2. Accordingly, the present Appeals stand dismissed in default and for non-prosecution.NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.APRIL 01, 2026 N This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/04/2026 at 11:00:27...
Universal Sompo Gen Ins Co Ltd vs Arti Vishnoi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ MAC.APP. 257/2021 & CM APPL. 32066/2021 UNIVERSAL SOMPO GEN INS CO LTD .....Appellant Through: Mohammad Mustafa, Ms. Arpita Biswas, Advocates (through VC).versusARTI VISHNOI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Mr. Ritik Singh, Advocates for Respondent Nos.1-5.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYALORDER% 01.04.20261. This appeal has been filed by the Insurance Company assailing theaward dated 4th September 2020 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Saket Courts, New Delhi (MACT) in MACT No.773/2018, where compensation of Rs.1,03,98,417/- along with interest @9% was awarded.2. The accident occurred on 30th June 2018 at about 3:00 AM, whendeceased was travelling from Police Line Noida to his residence by car. When deceased reached Surajpur Police Line, a truck bearing registration no. UP 16DT 9471 came from opposite side in a rash and negligent manner and collided with the car which resulted in grievous i...
Sh. Chander Bose vs Sh. Dharamvir Singh
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
$~12 & 13* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIRFA 800/2023, CM APPL. 50215/2023 SH. CHANDER BOSE .....Appellant Through: NoneversusSH. RAKESH CHAHAR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sagar Sehrawat, Advocate + RFA 815/2023, CM APPL. 51366-51367/2023 SH. CHANDER BOSE .....Appellant Through: NoneversusSH. DHARAMVIR SINGH .....Respondent Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 01.04.20261. None is present on behalf of the Appellant nor was anyone present on the last date.2. Accordingly, the present Appeals stand dismissed in default and for non-prosecution.NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.APRIL 01, 2026 N This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/04/2026 at 11:01:15...
Narender Kumar vs Jagdish Chander
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 2654/2024 & CM APPL. 31699/2024 NARENDER KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: None.versusJAGDISH CHANDER .....Respondent Through: Mr. Umesh Gupta, Mr. Malkeet Singh and Ms. Mamita Gupta, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 01.04.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. As nobody has appeared on behalf of the petitioner, let the matter be called again at 02:30 P.M. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J APRIL 1, 2026/nd At 02:45 PM3. At this stage, it is already 02:45 PM, nobody has appeared on behalf of the petitioner.4. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed in default. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J APRIL 1, 2026/nd/iskThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/04/2026 at 10:16:11...
Sr Ashok and Associates Private Limited vs Assistant Commissioner Cent ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 7767/2024 SR ASHOK AND ASSOCIATES PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhishek Garg and Mr. Naman Mehta, Advocates.versusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER CENTRAL EXCISE/CENTRAL GST DIVISION VASANT KUNJ COLLECTORATE DELHI SOUTH & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Atul Tripathi, SSC, Mr. Shubham Mishra, Mr. Gaurav Mani Tripathi, Mr. Akshay Sagar and Mr. Madhav Anand, AdvocatesCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBREHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAULORDER% 01.04.20261. The prayer in the petition is in relation to refund of service tax which was paid by the petitioner for various contracts from April, 2015 to March, 2016.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the prayer of the petitioner for refund has been already rejected vide order 14th November, 2024.3. Subsequent thereto, on 10th November, 2025, the Registrar considered the request of the petitioner to file an application for amendment. Accordingly...
M/S Suraksha Security Pvt. Ltd. vs Sh. Raj Narayan Mishra
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 8805/2019, CM APPL. 26456/2024 M/S SURAKSHA SECURITY PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner Through: None.versusSH. RAJ NARAYAN MISHRA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Chandan Mishra and Mr. Rahul Kulhare, Advocates with respondent- workman in person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIORDER% 01.04.20261. None appears for the petitioner.2. At the outset, learned counsel appearing for the respondent submitsthat the petitioner has repeatedly failed to appear, as well as comply with the orders passed by this Court. In this regard, he refers to the order dated 24.02.2025, wherein an application filed on behalf of the respondent- workman under Section 17-B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, remains to be considered. In the said order, it was also noted that the litigation expenses to the tune of Rs.15,000/- were directed to be paid to the respondent-workman, which is not done till date. He states that the petitioner has not been appear...
Aman Kathpal vs Union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 12.03.2026Pronounced on: 01.04.2026+ W.P.(CRL) 2049/2022 & CRL.M.A. 17762/2022, CRL.M.A. AMAN KATHPAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Jai Anant Dehadrai, Ms.Srutee Priyadarshini, Ms.Bhavya Jain, AdvocatesversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Shadan Farasat, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Arkaprava Dass, Adv. for R-2. + W.P.(CRL) 3029/2024 & CRL.M.A. 29390/2024 PANKAJ DHINGRA .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Shadan Farasat, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Arkaprava Dass, Adv.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl.) for the State with SI Sandeep, P.S. Bindapur. Mr.Jai Anant Dehadrai, Ms.Srutee Priyadarshini, Ms.Bhavya Jain, Advocates for R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJADigitally Signed W.P.(CRL) 2049/2022 & W.P.(CRL) 3029/2024 Page 1 of 16JUDGMENTNAVIN CHAWLA, J.1. As the present petitions concern the custody of the ...
Jawaharlal Nehru University vs Shri Ramay
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 11116/2020 & CM APPL. 34709/2020 JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vasanth Rajasekaran (Senior Standing Counsel JNU) Mr. Karan Prakash Mr. Harshvardhan Korada Ms. Deepshikha Kumar and Mr. Om Bali, AdvocatesversusSHRI RAMAY .....Respondent Through: Ms. Meghna De, Ms. L. Gangmei and Mr. Siddharth Sapra, AdvocatesCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIORDER% 01.04.20261. Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit, that in the mediationproceedings held before Samadhan, Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre, a settlement agreement dated 27.03.2026 has been executed, as per which, the petitioner has occurred to pay a sum of Rs.11,00,000/-, and the same stands disbursed and received by the respondent.2. Learned counsel for the respondent agrees to the same, and furtherstates that in terms of the settlement agreement, the claim filed by the respondent No. 1A before CGIT would also be withd...
Azad vs the State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 2267/2025 AZAD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankaj Giri, AdvocateversusTHE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the State with SI Amit Kumar PS Moti Nagar and Inspr Sumit Kumar P.S. Patel NagarCORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 01.04.20261. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the present bail application with liberty to file afresh.2. Accordingly, the present bail application stands dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for.3. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J APRIL 01, 2026/ns/APThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/04/2026 at 11:32:21...
- ‹ Prev
- 509
- 510
- 511
- 512
- 513
- 515
- 516
- 517
- 518
- 519
- Next ›
- Last »