Delhi Court April 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Deepak & Ors. vs State of National Capital Territory of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2417/2026 DEEPAK & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajat Janiwal, Mr. Akanksha Wadhwan and Mr. Manish Barua, Advocates. Petitioners Nos. 1 to 6 are present.versusSTATE OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI &ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Kiran Bairwa, APP for the State. ASI Nathulal and SI Raghuraj Singh, P.S. Sangam Vihar.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 01.04.2026By way of the present petition filed under section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioners, who are the husband and in-laws of the complainant/respondent No. 2, seek quashing of case FIR No. 0124/2025 dated 02.03.2025 registered under sections 85/316(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 at P.S.: Sangam Vihar, South Delhi.2. The petition is premised on mediated Settlement dated 22.11.2025arrived at through mediation before the Counselling Cell, Family Courts, South District, Saket, New De...
Yash Aggarwal vs Vineet Kumar Garg
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 675/2026 & CM APPL. 20324/2026, CM APPL. 20325/2026& CM APPL. 20326/2026YASH AGGARWAL .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Aprajita Sharma, Adv. (throughVC)versusVINEET KUMAR GARG .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 01.04.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 227of the Constitution of India, 1950 read with Section 151 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 assailing the order dated 12th January, 2026 passed by the learned Trial Court in Civil Suit DJ No. 1097/2024.3. After some arguments, learned counsel appearing on behalf of thepetitioner seeks leave of the court to withdraw the present petition.4. Keeping in view the submissions made by the learned counselappearing on behalf of the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Pending application(s), ...
Commissioner of Income Tax, International Taxation-1, Delhi vs Eicr (C ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 272/2026, CM APPL. 20659/2026COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, INTERNATIONALTAXATION-1, DELHI .....Appellant Through: Mr. Puneet Rai, SSC, Mr. Ashvini Kr. & Mr. Rishabh Nangia, JSCs.versusEICR (CYPRUS) LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Vaibhav Kulkarni, Mr. Himanshu Aggarwal, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARORDER% 01.04.2026 CM APPL. 20660/2026 (delay in re-filing)1. Present application has been filed by the applicant-appellant seekingcondonation of delay of 43 days in re-filing the appeal.2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. Delay of43 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned.3. Application stands disposed of.ITA 272/20264. Mr. Puneet Rai, learned senior standing counsel for the appellant fairlysubmitted that the facts and even the persons involved in the present appeal are identical to those in ITA 556/2024 (The Commissione...
Chitturi Bharani vs Dr Abhijat Chandrakant Sheth & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 527/2026 CHITTURI BHARANI .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Yoothica Pallavi, Adv.versusDR ABHIJAT CHANDRAKANT SHETH & ANR......Respondents Through: Mr. T. Singhdev, Mr. Abhijit Chakravarty and Mr. Vedant Sood, Advs., NMC.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 01.04.20261. The present petition alleges wilful disobedience of the directionscontained in the order dated 08.12.2025 passed in W.P.(C) 18590/2025. The said order reads as under: 1. This writ petition is filed on behalf of Petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the direction inter alia to Respondent Nos.1 and 2 to issue the Eligibility Certificate.2. Issue notice.3. Mr. T. Singhdev, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of NationalMedical Commission.4. Considering that the last date for applying for Foreign MedicalGraduate Examination (FMGE) December, 2025 is over on 04.12.2025, this writ petition is disposed of without enter...
Surender Kumar vs Dayaparkash Gupta (Deceased) Thr Lrs
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RC.REV. 149/2020 & CM APPL. 11518/2020 SURENDER KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pramod K. Sharma, Mr. Prakhar Vashisht, Advs.versusDAYAPARKASH GUPTA (DECEASED) THR LRS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Vinod Sharma, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMAORDER% 01.04.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petition under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent ControlAct, 1958, seeks the following prayers: -It is therefore, most respectfully and humbly prayed to this Hon'ble Court to set-aside the order dated 23.12.2019 passed by Ld. ARC in ARC No.25571/2016 titled as "DayaParkash (deceased) through LRS. Vs. Surender Kumar" and grant leave to defend the eviction petition, to the petitioner, in the interest of justice and to avoid miscarriage of justice.Any other or further order which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, just and proper be passed in favour of petitioner and a...
Krishan Chander & Ors. vs State of Gnct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6337/2022 KRISHAN CHANDER & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: None.versusSTATE OF GNCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....RespondentsThrough: Mr. Tushar Sannu and Mr. Parvin Bansal, Advocates.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 01.04.20261. None appears for the petitioner despite the matter has been called forhearing in the second round.2. The petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J APRIL 1, 2026 aksThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/04/2026 at 11:23:06...
Sonu vs the State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 01.04.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 1355/2025 SONU .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pankaj, Advocate.versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State with SI Manoj Kumar, SI Data Ram and SI Lalit Kumar. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL)1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 931/2023 of Police Station Sarai Rohilla for offence under Section1.1 This bail application came up for the first hearing on 07.04.2025 before the predecessor bench and thereafter continued getting adjourned before different benches. Along with 179 such old pending bail applications, this application also was transferred to this bench.BAIL APPLN. 1355/2025 Page 1 of 4 pages 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec455 69af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH Signature Not Verified COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, 0996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, Digitally Signed Date: 2026.04.01...
Aps Hydro Private Limited vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 9132/2022 APS HYDRO PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Prabhat Kumar, Advocate.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Indruj Singh Rai, SSC with Mr. Sanjeev Menon, Mr. Rahul Singh, JSCs. Mr. Vijay Joshi, CGSC with Mr. Shubham Chaturvedi, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARORDER% 01.04.20261. By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged thenotice dated 16.02.2022 and corresponding order/communication dated 12.05.2022 issued by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax holding the petitioner to be an assessee in default under Section 220(1) of the Income Tax Act,1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act of 1961).2. The petitioner has approached this Court with a specific plea that noneof the orders passed under Section 154, Section 143(1)(a) and Section 271(1)(c) of the Act of 1961 were ever served upon it and the petitioner ...
Vishwash Kumar Kashyap vs State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1592/2025 VISHWASH KUMAR KASHYAP .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajeev Chhetri, Mr. Rajesh Chhetri and Mr. Sandip, Advocates.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with Inspectors Yakub Khan and Jitender Malik.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAORDER% 01.04.20261. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 79/2019 ofPolice Station New Delhi Railway Station for offence under Section 302/34 IPC. 1.1 This bail application came up for the first hearing on 25.04.2025 before the predecessor bench and thereafter continued getting adjourned before different benches. Along with 179 such old pending bail applications, this application also was transferred to this bench. 1.2 Today is the first hearing before me.2. At the very outset, learned counsel for accused/applicant seeks permission to withdraw this bail application. The application is dismissed as withdrawn. G...
Kishan Sharma & Ors. vs Mangt. of M.C.D.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 12.02.2026 Date of decision: 01.04.2026 Uploaded on: 01.04.2026+ W.P.(C) 1162/2008 KISHAN SHARMA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. R.K. Ojha, Adv.versusMANGT. OF MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, SC with Ms. Shweta Singh, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHAIL JAINJUDGMENTSHAIL JAIN, J.1. The present Petition has been filed under Article 226 of theConstitution of India, inter alia, challenging the Award dated 25th October, 2007 (impugned Award), passed by the learned Presiding Officer of the Labour Court No. X, Delhi, in Industrial Dispute (I.D.) No. 2016/1994. By the said Award, the learned Labour Court declined the relief of reinstatement in service with continuity and full back wages sought by the Petitioners, holding that the Petitioners/Workmen were not entitled to any relief since the employer-...
- ‹ Prev
- 507
- 508
- 509
- 510
- 511
- 513
- 514
- 515
- 516
- 517
- Next ›
- Last »