Delhi Court April 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vipin Pathak vs State of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-28-2026
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 454/2026 VIPIN PATHAK .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Raunak Parekh, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP with SI Rahul Rathi. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN ORDER % 28.04.2026 1. Learned counsel for applicant submits that prosecution strongly relies upon the CCTV footage but fact remains that so far, no such CCTV footage has been provided to accused persons whereas, the case is already at the stage of trial. 2. Learned APP for the State, on instructions from IO, submits that the concerned DVR has been sent to FSL for analysis and, therefore, perhaps it could not be supplied. 3. He, however, submits that in any case, since the charge-sheet has already been filed and since the complainant has also been examined in part, every effort would be made to provide CCTV footage to the applicant/accused within three weeks from today. 4. The ...
Zhongfu Mobile Pvt Ltd vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-28-2026
$~1 to 6, 54, 55, 59 to 63, 72 to 102, 104 to 115 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2617/2026 CM APPL. 12726/2026 + W.P.(C) 2626/2026 CM APPL. 12775/2026 + W.P.(C) 2632/2026 CM APPL. 12788/2026 + W.P.(C) 2644/2026 CM APPL. 12861/2026 + W.P.(C) 2646/2026 CM APPL. 12875/2026 + W.P.(C) 3001/2026 CM APPL. 14496/2026 + W.P.(C) 17735/2025 CM APPL. 73296/2025 + W.P.(C) 18878/2025 CM APPL. 78605/2025 + W.P.(C) 219/2026 CM APPL. 1011/2026 + W.P.(C) 220/2026 CM APPL. 1014/2026 + W.P.(C) 223/2026 CM APPL. 1078/2026 + W.P.(C) 224/2026 CM APPL. 1080/2026 + W.P.(C) 225/2026 CM APPL. 1082/2026 + W.P.(C) 14952/2025 CM APPL. 61522/2025 + W.P.(C) 14962/2025 CM APPL. 61539/2025 + W.P.(C) 14963/2025 CM APPL. 61541/2025 + W.P.(C) 14966/2025 CM APPL. 61546/2025 + W.P.(C) 14968/2025 CM APPL. 61550/2025 + W.P.(C) 14970/2025 CM APPL. 61553/2025 + W.P.(C) 15983/2025 CM APPL. 65400/2025 + W.P.(C) 16009/2025 CM APPL. 65606/2025 + W.P.(C) 16010/2025 CM APPL. 65608/2025 + W...
Sh Surender Kumar vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 1619/2026 & CM APPL. 14839/2026SH SURENDER KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Jai Ram Garg and Mr. Ritesh Goyal, AdvocatesversusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHIAND ORS. ....Respondents Through: Mr. Ashutosh Gupta, ASC with Mr. Pulkit Garg, Advocate for MCD Mr. Madhu Sudan Bhayana, Mr. Suresh Chadhari and Mr. Madhav, Advocates for R-3 Mr. Rajesh Kumar, SPC with Ms. Reetu Jha, Advocate for R-4/UOICORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 28.04.20261. Counsel for the petitioner submits that he has entered into a settlementwith the private respondent no.3, in terms of which, the private respondent no. 3 has agreed to block the toilet constructed on the Third Floor of the subject property.2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.3. Pending application stands disposed of.4. Needless to state, the aforesaid statement shall not bind therespondent no.1/MCD.AMIT BANSAL, JAPRIL 28, 2...
Lingdao Mobiles India Pvt Ltd vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-28-2026
$~1 to 6, 54, 55, 59 to 63, 72 to 102, 104 to 115* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2617/2026 CM APPL. 12726/2026 + W.P.(C) 2626/2026 CM APPL. 12775/2026 + W.P.(C) 2632/2026 CM APPL. 12788/2026 + W.P.(C) 2644/2026 CM APPL. 12861/2026 + W.P.(C) 2646/2026 CM APPL. 12875/2026 + W.P.(C) 3001/2026 CM APPL. 14496/2026 + W.P.(C) 17735/2025 CM APPL. 73296/2025 + W.P.(C) 18878/2025 CM APPL. 78605/2025 + W.P.(C) 219/2026 CM APPL. 1011/2026 + W.P.(C) 220/2026 CM APPL. 1014/2026 + W.P.(C) 223/2026 CM APPL. 1078/2026 + W.P.(C) 224/2026 CM APPL. 1080/2026 + W.P.(C) 225/2026 CM APPL. 1082/2026 + W.P.(C) 14952/2025 CM APPL. 61522/2025 + W.P.(C) 14962/2025 CM APPL. 61539/2025 + W.P.(C) 14963/2025 CM APPL. 61541/2025 + W.P.(C) 14966/2025 CM APPL. 61546/2025 + W.P.(C) 14968/2025 CM APPL. 61550/2025 + W.P.(C) 14970/2025 CM APPL. 61553/2025 + W.P.(C) 15983/2025 CM APPL. 65400/2025 + W.P.(C) 16009/2025 CM APPL. 65606/2025 + W.P.(C) 16010/2025 CM APPL. 65608/2025 + W.P.(C) 16049/2025 ...
Gaurav Tyagi & Anr. vs Govt. of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2033/2026 & CM APPL. 9956/2026 GAURAV TYAGI & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Anurag Tomar and vipin kumar, Advs.versusGOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anubhav Gupta , Panel Counsel ( Civil) GNCTD, Mr. Kartik Sharma, Advocates for R-1. Ms. Sonali Chopra, Advocate for R-2.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 28.04.20261. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks to withdraw theinstant petition in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties.2. Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, JAPRIL 28, 2026/PThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/05/2026 at 12:44:30...
Narendra Kumar Nirwan vs Anju Singh Deceased Through Her Authorised Re ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-28-2026
$~96 to 103* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.REV.P.(NI) 48/2026 & CRL.M.As. 5391-5392/2026,CRL.M.(BAIL) 368/2026NARENDRA KUMAR NIRWAN .....RevisionistANJU SINGH DECEASED THROUGH HER AUTHORISEDREPRESENTATIVE MR YUVRAJ SINGH .....Respondent+ CRL.REV.P.(NI) 49/2026 & CRL.M.As. 5394-5395/2026,CRL.M.(BAIL) 369/2026MS ANJU SINGH DECEASEDTHROUGH HER AR MR YUVRAJ SINGH ..... Respondent+ CRL.REV.P.(NI) 50/2026 & CRL.M.As. 5397-5398/2026,CRL.M.(BAIL) 370/2026+ CRL.REV.P.(NI) 51/2026 & CRL.M.As. 5400-5401/2026,CRL.M.(BAIL) 371/2026CRL.REV.P.(NI) 48/2026 and connected matters Page 1 of 4 + CRL.REV.P.(NI) 52/2026 & CRL.M.As. 5403/2026, 5424/2026,CRL.M.(BAIL) 372/2026MS ANJU SINGH DECEASED THROUGH HERA R / LEGAL HEIR MR YUVRAJ SINGH .....Respondent+ CRL.REV.P.(NI) 53/2026 & CRL.M.As. 5405/2026, 5425/2026,CRL.M.(BAIL) 373/2026+ CRL.REV.P.(NI) 54/2026 & CRL.M.A. 5407-5408//2026,CRL.M.(BAIL) 374/2026HER A R LEGAL HEIR MR YUVRAJ SINGH .....Respondent+ CRL.REV...
Ravinder Kumar Chopra vs State C.B.I.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment Reserved on: 22.04.2026Judgment pronounced on: 28.04.2026+ CRL.A. 359/2002 RAVINDER KUMAR CHOPRA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vishwajeet Singh, Ms. Mugdha and Ms. Priti Verma, Advocates.versusSTATE C.B.I. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Kamal Kant Goel, SPP with Ms. Jyoti Goel, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHAJUDGMENTCHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA, J.1. In this appeal filed under Section 374(2) of the Code ofCriminal Procedure, 1973, (the Cr.P.C.) the first accused (A1), inC.C. No. 42/1993 on the file of the Special Judge, Delhi, assailsthe judgment dated 30.03.2002 and order on sentence dated01.04.2002 as per which A1 and the second accused (A2) havebeen convicted and sentenced for the offence punishable underSection 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (the IPC) and furtherSignature Not Verified CRL.A. 359/2002 Page 1 of 43A1 has been convicted for the offences punishable...
Ishwar vs Competent Authority and Administrator
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2100/2022, CM APPL. 6033/2022, CM APPL. 57370/2025& CM APPL. 57371/2025ISHWAR .....Petitioner Through: None.versusCOMPETENT AUTHORITY AND ADMINISTRATOR.....Respondent Through: Mr Ishkaran Singh Bhandari with Mr Piyush Yadav, Advs.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 28.04.20261. None appears on behalf of the petitioner despite second round.2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.Pending applications also stand disposed of.PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, JAPRIL 28, 2026trThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/05/2026 at 12:59:55...
Mohd. Shamsher Ansari vs State of Nct Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 28.04.2026+ BAIL APPLN. 721/2026 MOHD. SHAMSHER ANSARI .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Medhavi Tyagi, Mr. DevenderKumar and Mr. Utsav Kumar, AdvocateversusSTATE OF NCT DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State with Inspector Kaushlesh KumarCORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAJ U D G M E N T (ORAL)1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 634/2022 ofPolice Station Swaroop Nagar for offence under Section 302/34 IPC & 27 Arms Act.1.1 Despite last order, learned counsel for accused/applicant did not place on record a copy of the chief-examination of PW1 Prince Kumar. As recorded in last order, the accused/applicant had filed only a part of crossexamination of PW1. However, in terms with last order, State filed detailed status report dated nil vide Index dated 04.04.2026.BAIL APPLN. 721/20...
Madan Mohan Babbar vs the State (Nct of Delhi) Through Sho of Police S ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 737/2026 MADAN MOHAN BABBAR .....Petitioner Through: None.versusTHE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) THROUGH SHO OF POLICE STATION MOTI NAGAR DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the State with Mr. Divyang Kiswan, Advocate and with SI Rattiram.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 28.04.20261. No one has appeared on behalf of the applicant, when the matter wastaken up for hearing at 11:15 AM.2. It seems that the applicant is not interested in pursuing the presentmatter any further.3. Accordingly, the present bail application stands dismissed for non-prosecution.4. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith.DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, JAPRIL 28, 2026/zp/apThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/04/2026 at 11...
- ‹ Prev
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- Next ›
- Last »