Delhi Court April 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ram Nath vs State (N.C.T. of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 30.04.2026+ BAIL APPLN. 1368/2026RAM NATH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manoj Kumar Duggal, AdvocateversusSTATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State with Inspector Puneet BhartiCORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAJ U D G M E N T (ORAL)1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 720/2023 ofPolice Station Nangloi for offence under Section 302/201/34 IPC.2. Broadly speaking, prosecution case is as follows. The deceased,having separated from her husband, was living with her daughter alone. Further, it is the case of the prosecution that the deceased was a sex worker, whose services were availed by four accused persons, including the present accused/applicant and in the course of aggressive sex, the presentBAIL APPLN. 1368/2026 Page 1 of 4 pagesDate: 2026.04.30 05:13:51 -07'00'accused/applicant strangulated the deceased to death, after which all ...
Piyush Yadav vs the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1372/2026 PIYUSH YADAV .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Suraj Prakash Sharma, AdvversusTHE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Tarang Srivastava, APP SI Rakesh Kumar Mr Sujeet Beniwal, Adv. for complainant.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 30.04.20261. By way of the present application under Section 483 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the applicant seeks regular bail in connection with FIR No. 119/2026 dated 07.03.2026, registered at Police Station Narela, Outer Delhi (North), under Sections 125, 351(2), and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, as well as Sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act, 1959.2. After some arguments, Mr. Suraj Prakash Sharma, learned counselfor the applicant, seeks permission to withdraw the present application, without prejudice to the applicants rights and remedies before the learned Sessions Court at the appropriate stage, in accordan...
Deepak Mann vs State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 1137/2026 DEEPAK MANN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rohit Raman, Mr. Nitesh and Mr. Rohit Kumar, Advocates.versusSTATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC for the State.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 30.04.2026 CRL.M.A. 10771/2026 (exemption) Exemption granted, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed of.W.P.(CRL) 1137/2026By way of the present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioner had sought parole on the ground that his wife requires gallstone surgery.2. In the meantime, however the wife is stated to have undergone thesurgery.3. Notice on this petition was issued on 09.04.2026.4. Status Report and Verification Report both dated 10.04.2026 havebeen filed.5. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has drawn ...
Rashid Khan and Others vs State of N.C.T. of Delhi and Another
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
$~22 Q* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2745/2026, CRL.M.A. 11177/2026 RASHID KHAN AND OTHERS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Faiz Khan, Mr. Mohd Sazzal, Mr. Zubaid Khan, Ms. Sadaf Hashmi, Ms. Fauzia Malik, Advs.versusSTATE OF N.C.T. OF DELHI AND ANOTHER .....Respondent Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP with Mr.Abhimanyu Arya, Advocate. SI Sunita Mr. Aasif Abdullah and Mr. Vishal, Advocates for R-2 with R- 2 in person.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 30.04.20261. The petitioners have filed this petition under Section 528 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS] (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC]) seeking quashing of FIR No. 495/2020, dated 14.12.2020, registered at Police Station Pul Prahlad Pur, under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [IPC], and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 [DP Act], and all proceedings emanating therefrom, on the ground of settlement.2. ...
Natco Pharma Ltd vs Fmc Agro Singapore Pte Ltd & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
$~29 & 30* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 295/2022 NATCO PHARMA LTD .....PlaintiffFMC AGRO SINGAPORE PTE LTD & ORS. .....Defendants(30) + CS(COMM) 349/2022 FMC CORPORATION & ORS. .....PlaintiffsNATCO PHARMA LIMITED .....DefendantCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELAORDER% 30.04.2026 I.A. 12182/2026 in CS(COMM) 295/2022 & I.A. 12223/2026 in CS(COMM) 349/2022 (Under Order XXIII Rule 3, CPC)CS(COMM) 295/2022 & connected matter Page 1 of 41. These are joint applications filed under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Codeof Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as CPC) seeking recordal of settlement between the parties.2. Learned counsel for the parties state that the inter se disputes have beenresolved amicably out of Court.3. The terms of settlement is stated to have been recorded into writing videthe Settlement Agreement dated 31.03.2026. It is further stated by the learned counsel that the Settlement Agreemen...
State (Nct of Delhi) vs Dilavar Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 18.03.2026Pronounced on: 30.04.2026+ CRL.A. 169/2022 STATE .....Appellant Through: Mr.Aman Usman, APP with Mr.Manvendra Yadav and Mr.Atiq Ur Rehman, Advs.versusDILAVAR SINGH ..Respondent Through: Ms.Rakhi Dubey, Adv. (DHCLSC) (Amicus Curiae) with Ms.Arpita Srivastava, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJAJUDGMENTNAVIN CHAWLA, J.1. This appeal has been filed challenging the judgment dated28.11.2019 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (POCSO) West, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Trial Court) in Sessions Case no. 219/2013 arising out of FIR no. 183/2013 under Sections 342/506/376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as IPC) and Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as POCSO Act), registered at Police Station Paschim Vihar, Delhi, whereby the learned Trial Court...
Nitin Kumar Gupta vs State Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2747/2026 NITIN KUMAR GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mayank Kumar and Mr. Damodar Kumar, Advocates with petitioner in person.versusSTATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for State with Mr. Gaurav Bisht, Ms. Ankita Bisht and Mr. Rohit Chaprana, Advocates with SI Ankush Mr. Vipul Upadhyay, Advocate for R- 2 to 4 and R-2 to 4 in person.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 30.04.20261. By way of the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of theFIR bearing No. 673/2024, registered at Police Station Alipur, Delhi, for the commission of offence punishable under Section 106(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (hereafter BNS) and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of settlement arrived at between the parties.2. Issue notice. The learned APP accepts notice on behalf of the State.3. The petitioner an...
Vivek Khanna vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4765/2026 and CM APPL. 23310/2026VIVEK KHANNA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Verdaan Jain, Advocate.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....RespondentsThrough: Mr Karan Gandhi, Mr Sikhar Tiwari, Mr Vishant Ms. Vidhika Kapoor Ms Riya Jain Advocates for R-3.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 30.04.20261. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission towithdraw the instant petition with liberty to raise all issues before the appropriate authorities.2. Liberty, as prayed, is granted. The petition, along with pendingapplication, stands dismissed as withdrawn.3. All rights and contentions of the parties are left open.PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J APRIL 30, 2026 aksThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server...
Ravi Arora vs J.S. Malik
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment delivered on: 30/04/2026+ CS(OS) 497/2004, I.A. 2994/2004, I.A. 6121/2004 & I.A. 9911/2005RAVI ARORA .....PlaintiffversusJ.S. MALIK .....DefendantAdvocates who appeared in this caseFor the Plaintiff : Mr. H.L. Tiku, Senior Advocate with Mrs. Bharti Kochhar, Ms. Yashmeet Kaur, Mr. Rahul Regmi and Mr. Munish Kochhar, Advocates.For the Defendant : Ms. Prerana and Ms. Aditi Singh, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAJUDGMENTTEJAS KARIA, J INTRODUCTION:1. The present Suit has been instituted by the Plaintiff seeking a decree ofspecific performance against the Defendant in respect of the Agreement to Sell dated 27.01.2003 (ATS), inter alia, directing the Defendant to perform his obligations / the obligations of Mrs. Joginder Malik (Mrs. Malik) under the ATS, including to execute the Sale Deed in favour of the Plaintiff in respect of the built-up residential property No. C-4/49, SafdarjungSignature Not Verified CS(...
Pankaj Pandey vs New-Delhi Muncipal Council and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4772/2026 & CM APPL.29013/2026 PANKAJ PANDEY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. N.K. Sahoo, Adv.versusNEW-DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sriharsha Peechara, Standing Counsel for NDMC with Mr. Chetanya Singh, ASC, Mr. Soumit Ganguli, Ms. Ravicha Sharma, Ms. Shruti Agarwal, Mr. Akash Sharma and Ms. Swati, Advocates. Mr. Devvrat Yadav, SPC with Mr. Kartik Sharma, GP for UOI.CORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAINORDER% 30.04.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. In view of the order passed in W.P.(C) 4771/2026 today, no further orderswould be required in this matter and the Petitioners peaceful vending would not be disturbed.3. The appearance of Mr. Vikas Kumar Sharma, Sr. Panel Counsel forRespondent No.3 is taken on record in the order dated 10th April, 2026. Accordingly, the application being CM APPL.29013/2026 is disposed of.4. The present ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »