Delhi Court April 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sushil Kumar vs the State Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3277/2026 SUSHIL KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Deepak Kumar, Mr. Sumit Chauhan and Mohd. Mohid, Advs.versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP with Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh and Ms. Upasana Bakshi, Advs. alongwith SI- Anil, PS: Seemapuri Mr. Ankit Chauhan and Mr. Palash Sharma, Advs. for R-2CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 29.04.20261. By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.784/2019 dated 03.12.2019 registered at PS: Seemapuri under Section 279 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and all proceedings emanating therefrom, in view of Settlement Deed dated 22.04.2026 [Annexure P-4], whereby the petitioner and the respondent no.2 have mutually and amicably resolved their disputes, which is accompanied by their respective affidavit(s) and proof(s) of identity.2. Issue ...
South Asian Forum for People Against Terror vs Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5829/2026 & CM APPLs. 28661-63/2026 SOUTH ASIAN FORUM FOR PEOPLE AGAINST TERROR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Jai Shankar, Ms. Manav Gupta, Ms. Nandita Rao, Mr. Manoj Makhija, Ms. L. Rajput, Mr. Vijay P. Singh, Mr. S. Singh, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Pratima N. Lakra, CGSC for UOI Mr. Sameer Vashisht, S.C. with Ms. Harshita Nathrani, Adv. for R-3 and 4CORAM:HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAORDER% 29.04.20261. Heard learned counsel representing the petitioner, Ms. Pratima N. Lakra, learned Central Government Standing Counsel for respondent nos.1 and 2 and Mr. Sameer Vashisht, learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos.3 and 4.2. This public interest litigation petition raises certain issues relating to grant of compensation etc. to the families of the victims/survivors/next-kin of the terrorist attack etc.3. The petitioner furth...
Raju Shah vs State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
$~77 & 82* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1652/2026 & CRL.M.A. 13383/2026 MANISH Through: Mr. Mehul Sharma, Mr. Nagesh Sharma, Mr. Lalit Kumar, Mr. Tarun Raj and Mr. Saurabh Kumar Manu, Advocates.STATE NCT OF DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1643/2026 & CRL.M.A. 13266/2026 RAJU SHAH Through: Ms. Dolly Sharma, Advocate. STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANRCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 29.04.20261. Both the applicants i.e. Manish and Raju Shah seek regular bail in theongoing murder trial related to case in FIR No.0236/2016 dated 20.05.2016, registered at P.S. Khyala.BAIL APPLN. 1652/2026 & BAIL APPLN. 1643/2026 12. The prime-most contention raised by the applicants herein is that thereis long incarceration period as they both are behind the bars for more than seven years. It is submitted that all the material public witnesses, including eye-witnesses, have been examined, and since there are still 12 witnesses remaining to be examined, the...
Roshan Sharma & Ors. vs the State Govt Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
$~100-Q* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3274/2026 ROSHAN SHARMA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Anu Dixit & Ms. Divya Panwar, Advocates.versusTHE STATE GOVT NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP for State. ASI Naresh Singh, PS Dabri. Ms. Puja Shrivastava, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in Person.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 29.04.2026 CRL.M.A. 13327/2026 (Exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 3274/20261. The petitioners have filed the present petition under Section 528 ofthe Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS], corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC], seeking quashing of FIR No. 795/2023 dated 08.11.2023, registered at Police Station Dabri, Dwarka, Delhi, under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [IPC], alongwith all proceedings emanating therefrom, on the ground that the ...
Alexpandiyan M vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5848/2026, CM APPL. 28682/2026 and CM APPL. ALEXPANDIYAN M .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sandeep Mishra, Mr. Ayush Vardhan and Mr. Surbhit Nandan, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Subodh Kumar Kaushik, SPC along with Ms. Chhaya Sharma, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 29.04.20261. By filing the present Writ Petition in the year 2026, thePetitioner effectively seeks to impugn his termination order passed on 22.06.2021 and Order dated 12.11.2021 vide which his representation dated 13.08.2021 was rejected.2. The Petitioner was provisionally appointed as Constable (GD)in the year 2017, subject to verification of his criminal antecedents. On verification, it was found that the Petitioner was involved in a criminal case arising out of FIR No. 104/2012 at PS: M. Kallupatti, Madurai, Tamil Nadu. The Petitioner, however, had suppressed this informat...
Ajay Saxena & Ors. vs the State Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 29th April, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 3289/2026 & CRL.M.A. 13362/2026 AJAY SAXENA & ORS. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ayush Kumar, Advocate along with petitioners-in-personversusTHE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP for State/R-1 SI Devendra Singh, PS Jyoti Nagar R-2 in personCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINJ U D G M E N T (oral)1. Petitioners herein seek quashing of FIR No. 0242/2019 dated consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.2. Marriage between petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 was solemnized on 27.11.2020 according to Hindu rites and ceremonies at Delhi. There is no child from aforesaid wedlock.3. However, on account of some matrimonial discord and temperamental differences, respondent No. 2 reported the matter to the police which resulted in registration of aforesaid FIR.4. Learned counse...
Era Infra Engineering Ltd vs Delhi Development Authority & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 976/2026, CM APPL. 28706/2026, CM APPL. 28707/2026, CM APPL. 28708/2026 & CM APPL. 28709/2026 ERA INFRA ENGINEERING LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anirban Bhattacharya and Ms. Divya Verma, Advocates.versusDELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shashi Pratap Singh, Advocate for DDA.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 29.04.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. Learned Counsel for the respondents appears on advance notice andaccepts notice.3. After some arguments, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of thepetitioner seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the present petition, with liberty, to seek appropriate remedies by way of appeal under Order XLIII of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC).4. Keeping in view the submissions made by learned Counsel for thepetitioner the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn, with liber...
Babita and Anr. & Anr. vs Union of India & Ors. & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5874/2026 BABITA AND ANR. & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Kuldeep Singh, Adv.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Geetanjali Tyagi, SPC with Mr. Akash Gupta, GPCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 29.04.20261. In substance, the Petitioners pray for compassionateappointment of Petitioner No.2 on account of his fathers death on 17.10.2022, while he was working as Safaiwala with 365 RMPL/57 RCC (GREF).2. Petitioner No.1 filed an application on 27.06.2022, with thecompetent authority, seeking compassionate appointment of her son (Petitioner No.2).3. The Respondents assessed the application of the Petitionersson, along with 420 other applications. While examining the economic criteria, the competent authority found that Petitioner No. 1 scored only 59 marks out of 100 and, hence, pl...
Smt. Jyoti Chhibber vs Shakuntla Rani Bakshi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 981/2026, CM APPL. 28741/2026 & CM APPL. 28742/2026 SMT. JYOTI CHHIBBER .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar and Mr. Pratyush Nilotpal, Advocates.versusSHAKUNTLA RANI BAKSHI .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 29.04.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. After some arguments, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the present petition.3. Keeping in view the submissions made by learned Counsel for the petitioner the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, are also disposed of. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J APRIL 29, 2026/MR/iskThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/05/2026 at 11:18:51...
M/S Indus Valley Promoters Ltd. vs M/S Olympic Petroproducts Ltd.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 983/2026 & CM APPL. 28756/2026 M/S INDUS VALLEY PROMOTERS LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Hansraj Singh and Mr. Rishi Raghav, Advocates.versusM/S OLYMPIC PETROPRODUCTS LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanchit Garga and Mr. Shubham Attrey, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 29.04.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. After some arguments, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the present petition.3. Keeping in view the submissions made by learned Counsel for the petitioner the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, are also disposed of. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J APRIL 29, 2026/MR/iskThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server o...
- ‹ Prev
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- Next ›
- Last »