Delhi Court April 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Union of India and Ors vs Indu Raheja
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5858/2026 and CM APPLs.28696-97/2026 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Chetanya Puri, SPC with Mr. Vidhi Gupta, Advocate Mr. Devvrat Yadav SPC & Mr. Gaurav Patel, GPversusINDU RAHEJA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sourabh Ahuja, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKARHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLAORDER (ORAL)% 29.04.2026C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. After some hearing, Mr. Puri, learned SPC for the petitioners, seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition.2. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. C. HARI SHANKAR, J OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J APRIL 29, 2026/yg Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:AJIT KUMAR Signing Date:04.05.2026 15:40:21...
Jmc Infratech Private Limited vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5885/2026 CM APPL. 28892/2026 CM APPL. 28893/2026 JMC INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nitin Gulati, Adv.versusPRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX / ASSESSMENT UNIT (NFAC) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Appearance not givenCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARORDER% 29.04.20261. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seekspermission to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is granted.2. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.3. In case, the appeal is preferred within fifteen days from today, theAppellate Authority shall consider the appeal on merit without raising any objection about the limitation, as the petitioner was bonafidely pursuing his remedies before this Court.DINESH MEHTA, J VINOD KUMAR, J APRIL 29, 2026/ssThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi ...
M/S Erfolg (Through Its Partner Ms. Dimple Mehra) vs Municipal Corpora ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
$~58-59* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI58. + W.P.(C) 5825/2026 & CM APPL. 28656/2026 M/S ERFOLG (THROUGH ITS PARTNER MS. DIMPLE MEHRA) .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ayush Malhotra and Mr. Shobhit Garg, Advocates.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Bharat Malhotra and Ms. Gayatri Bhatia, Advocates for MCD. 59. + W.P.(C) 5836/2026 MS AMBER BAWA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ayush Malhotra and Mr. Shobhit Garg, Advocates.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. M.S. Oberoi, Standing counsel for MCD.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 29.04.20261. W.P.(C) 5825/2026 has been filed seeking the following reliefs:W.P.(C) 5825/2026 and connected matter Page 1 of 72. W.P.(C) 5836/2026 has been filed seeking the following reliefs:W.P.(C) 5825/2026 and connected matter Page 2 of 73. The aforesaid units in the subject property had been sealed by therespondent/MCD on 5th February, 2008 on the ...
Smt. XXXXXX vs State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 1394/2026 SMT. XXXXXX .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Gunjan Sinha Jain, AdvocateversusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr .Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC for the State with Mr. Alok Sharma alongwith SI Avaneesh Kumar, PS Krishna NagarCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 29.04.2026 CRL.M.A. 13420/2026 (for exemption)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The application is disposed of.W.P.(CRL) 1394/20263. By virtue of the present petition under Articles 226 and 227 of theConstitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner seeks following reliefs:- a. Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to conduct a fair, impartial, thorough and time-bound investigation into FIR No. 264/2021, U/S 323/341/427/34 IPC, P.S. Krishna Nagar under the monitoring/ ...
Sh Chandan Lal Yadav and Anr vs Tarun Shankar Arya Executive Engineer ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision : 29.04.2026 + CONT.CAS(C) 763/2026, CM APPL.28894/2026 SH CHANDAN LAL YADAV AND ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Praveen Suri, Advocate.versusTARUN SHANKAR ARYA EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KAROL BAGH ZONE AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Umang Tyagi, Mr. Sanyam Dahiya, Advs. for R4.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTASACHIN DATTA, J. (ORAL)1. The present petition alleges wilful disobedience of the directionscontained in the order dated 13.10.2025 passed in W.P.(C) 15137/2025. The said order reads as under:- 1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking directions to the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (''MCD"'), to take action against the unauthorized construction and encroachment in respect of property bearing Nu. WZ-92A, Todapur Village, New Delhi-110012.2. Learned counsel appearing for the MCD submits that the aforesaidproperty has already been inspected and the same constitutes ground ...
Mohamd Gaffar vs State of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
$~112-Q* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3302/2026, CRL.M.A. 13401/2026 MOHAMD GAFFAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Saurabh and Mr. Naveen, Advocates.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Tarang Srivastava, APP with SI Monu Kumari. Mr. Ravi Swami, Advocate.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 29.04.20261. The petitioner has filed this petition under Section 528 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS] (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC]), seeking quashing of FIR No. 472/2019 dated 29.07.2019, lodged at Police Station Dabri, District Dwarka, Delhi, under Sections 285/338 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [IPC], on the ground of settlement.2. Issue notice. Mr. Tarang Srivastava, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, accepts notice on behalf of the State. Mr. Ravi Swami, learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos. 2 and 3.3. The allegations, as borne out from ...
Shiv Nath Verma Smark Mahavidyalaya vs National Council for Teacher Ed ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5826/2026 SHIV NATH VERMA SMARK MAHAVIDYALAYA ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Gaurav Arora & Ms. Nidhi Arora Advs.versusNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Anuj Kapoor, Mr. Shivom Sethi, Mr. Nandeesh Nanda, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 29.04.20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia seeking the following prayers:- (a) Issue a Writ of Certiorari and Quash the WithdrawalOrder dt. 07.06.2025, withdrawing recognition of petitionerinstitution for running the B.ED. course from academic year 2025-2026; and;(b) Issue a Writ of Mandamus directing Respondent No.2 toissue restoration of recognition of petitioner institution for B.ED. course from Academic Year 2025-2026; and;(c) Issue a Writ of Mandamus enabling the petitioner toparticipate in counselling and admit students for B.ED. course for Academic Year 2025-2026. . . .2. ...
M/S Swikriti Travels vs M/S Mini Pocket Opc Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ FAO (COMM) 125/2026 CM APPL. 28873/2026, CM APPL. 28874/2026 M/S SWIKRITI TRAVELS .....Appellant Through: Mr. Chirag Madan, Ms. Ravleen Sabharwal, Ms. Ruchael, Mr. Ronit Bose and Mr. Harsh Chaudhary, Advs.versusM/S MINI POCKET OPC PVT LTD .....Respondent Through: Appearance not givenCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARORDER% 29.04.20261. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the appellant seeks to withdraw the present appeal. Permission is granted.2. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn along with pending applications. DINESH MEHTA, J VINOD KUMAR, J APRIL 29, 2026/ssThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/05/2026 at 12:11:23...
Vicky @ Gobind vs State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 29th April, 2026 + W.P.(CRL) 1389/2026 VICKY @ GOBIND .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anup Kumar Das with Ms. Prachi Sharma and Ms. Ishita Singh, Advocates.versusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl.) for State with SI Rohit, PS Uttam Nagar.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINJ U D G M E N T (oral)1. Petitioner is serving life sentence.2. His such sentence has already attained finality as he has not filed any Special Leave Petition before Honble Supreme Court.3. Petitioner was granted third spell of furlough for a period of two weeksby the competent authority vide order dated 18.03.2026. However, he has yet not been released on furlough for the reason that his one co-accused is already out on parole for a period of four weeks and is scheduled to surrender on 11.05.2026.4. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner is seekingfurlough to ensure that his daughter is...
Ashok Kumar Yadav vs Sanjeev Khirwar, Commissioner, Municipal Corporat ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
$~38, 44 & 53* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 692/2026 ASHOK KUMAR YADAV .....Petitioner Through: Appearance not given.versusINSPECTOR SHAILENDER SINGH .....Respondent Through: Mr. Dhananjai Rana, CGSC. + W.P.(C) 425/2025 ASHOK KUMAR YADAV .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Beenashaw N Soni, Standing Counsel, MCD with Ms. Ann Joseph, Adv. (M: 9810046611) Mr. Abhinav Sharma, Adv. (M: 9810382091)versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anand Jindal and Ms. Mansi Jindal, Advs. for applicant Insp Shailender Singh. Mr. Manish Kaushik, Adv. for Applicant. Mr. Dhananjai Rana, CGSC for Respondent No. 3/Delhi Police + CONT.CAS(C) 757/2026 ASHOK KUMAR YADAV .....Petitioner Through: Appearance not given.versusSANJEEV KHIRWAR, COMMISSIONER, MUNICIPAL CONT.CAS(C) 692/2026 & connected matters Page 1 of 8 CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Appearance not given.CORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAINORDER%...
- ‹ Prev
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- Next ›
- Last »