Delhi Court April 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vishal Malik vs High Court of Delhi Through Registrar General
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4185/2025 CM APPL. 19388/2025 VISHAL MALIK .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Somesh Chandra Jha and Mr. Akash Kishore, Advs.versusHIGH COURT OF DELHI THROUGH REGISTRAR GENERAL.....Respondent Through: Mr. Shohit Chaudhry, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARORDER% 29.04.20261. By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged,rather questioned, the marking criteria adopted by the respondent-Delhi High Court inter alia contending that the petitioner has been awarded lesser marks, (one mark each of the foire questions), whereas another candidate Mr. Hemant Prasad Uniyal was given 1.5 marks in Delhi Judicial Service Examination, 2023, which was conducted on 07.01.2025.2. The petitioner has placed for our perusal, a comparative chart whilecataloguing the answers he gave viz-a-viz the answers said to have been given by Mr. Uniyal with the written arguments. The same...
Sudhakar Sharma and Ors. vs State of Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
$~101-Q* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3282/2026 SUDHAKAR SHARMA AND ORS. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Tarun Garu, Mr. Parth Bhardwaj, Mr. Abhishek, Mr. Hitesh Mehta & Mr. Ram Vasisth, Advocates.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP for State. SI Nimm, PS Shahdara. Ms. Prabhjot Kaur & Ms. Bharti Kashyap, Advocates for R-2 alongwith R-2 in Person.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 29.04.2026 CRL.M.A. 13336/2026 (Exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 3282/20261. The petitioners have filed the present petition under Section 528 ofthe Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS], corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC], seeking quashing of FIR No. 69/2021 dated 09.03.2021, registered at Police Station Shahdara, under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [IPC], alongwith all pr...
Pushp Sharma vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5837/2026 PUSHP SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sandeep Kumar Mahapatra, CGSC, Ms. Mrinmayee Sahu, Mr. Tribhuvan, Mr. Abhimanyu and Ms. Anushka Sarraf, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Abhinav Singh, Adv. for GNCTD. Ms. Mamta Rani Jha, Mr. Rohan Ahuja, Ms. Shruttima Ehersa, Ms. Sanya Sehgal, Advs. for R-3.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 29.04.20261. The petitioner in person seeks liberty to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file civil suit and take appropriate remedy in accordance with law.2. With the aforesaid liberty, leaving all rights and contentions of the parties left open, the instant petition stands disposed of. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J APRIL 29, 2026/SHThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. ...
Pallab Kumar Sarkar vs Union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5809/2026 & CM APPLs. 28610-28611/2026 PALLAB KUMAR SARKAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Niraj Kumar Jha and Mr. Madhuresh Kumar Mishra, Advocates.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR .....Respondents Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAORDER% 29.04.20261. This writ petition seeks the following reliefs:a) Issue a writ of Certiorari quashing the Impugned Order dated 09.02.2023 imposing compulsory retirement on the Petitioner; b) Issue a writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner to his withheld post (Assiatant Director, w.e.f October 2021) with full back wages, seniority and all consequential benefits; c) Issue direction to the respondents to pay special compensation of Rs.5 Crores for the mental torture, irrevocable loss of reputation, causing detrimental health (especially to the eyes) caused due to immense depression leading to self-annihilatory tendencies. Also to pay liti...
Vigilance Council of India vs Government of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5802/2026 VIGILANCE COUNCIL OF INDIA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Swarn Kumar and Ms. Jayanti Jha, Advocates.versusGOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sumit K. Batra and Ms. Priyanka Jindal, Advocates for GNCTD. Ms. Mrinalini Sen, Standing Counsel with Ms. Kritika Gupta and Mr. Pranay Lakhanpal, Advocates for R3/DDA. Mr. Manu Chaturvedi, Standing Counsel with Mr. Kshitiz Kishor Rai, Advocate for MCD. Mr. Gaurav Mishra, CGSC with Ms. Neha Mishra, Advocate for R4/UoI. Mr. Akshit Mohan, Government Pleader for UoI.CORAM:HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAORDER% 29.04.20261. Heard the learned Counsel for the Parties.2. By instituting the proceedings of this Public Interest LitigationPetition, the following prayers have been made: A) Issue appropriate writs, orders or directions directing the Respondents to establish and operationalise within a time bound schedule a unified di...
Swami vs Rekha & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.REV.P.(MAT.) 232/2026 & CRL.M.A. 13317/2026, CRL.M.A. 13318/2026 SWAMI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Puneet Dhawan, Advocate via video-conferencing.versusREKHA & ANR. .....Respondents Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 29.04.2026After making some submissions, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition; with liberty to raise all his contentions before the learned Mahila Court in the pending proceedings. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed-of as withdrawn; with liberty as prayed for. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of.ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J APRIL 29, 2026 V.RawatThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/05/2026 at 12:19:32...
Vyapak Arora and Ors. vs State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3283/2026 VYAPAK ARORA AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Prabhav Ralli, Ms. Stuti Gupta, Mr. Mohit Mudgal, Mr. Ravi Kant Yadav and Mr. Dev Vrat Arya, Advocates alongwith petitioners in personversusSTATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP for the State with SI Tamanna, P.S. Paschim Vihar West Counsel with R-2 in personCORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 29.04.2026 CRL.M.A. 13337/2026 (exemption)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 3283/20263. By way of the present petition, petitioners seek quashing of FIRbearing no. 166/2025, registered at Police Station Paschim Vihar West, Delhi, for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter IPC).4. The petitioners and respondent no. 2 are present before this Court and have been identified by their counsels and concern...
Jbn Impex Private Limited vs Additional Commissioner Adjudication Cgst ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
$~78, 79 & 81* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5814/2026 & CM APPL. 28621/2026, CM APPL. JBN IMPEX PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER ADJUDICATION CGST DELHI NORTH & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shlok Chandra, Senior Standing Counsel for CGST with Mr Parikshit Singh Bhati and Ms Lolita Crasta, Advocates for R-1 to 3.+ W.P.(C) 5838/2026 & CM APPL. 28670/2026, CM APPL. BRILLIANT METALS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner JOINT COMMISSIONER ADJUDICATION CGST DELHI NORTH & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Anushree Narain, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Yamit Jetley, Adv. + W.P.(C) 5866/2026 & CM APPL. 28734/2026, CM APPL. PROGRESSIVE ALLOYS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner JOINT COMMISSIONER ADJUDICATION CGST DELHI NORTH & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Appearance not given.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBREHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAULORDER% 29.04.20261. Heard.2. The prayer in the ...
Ramakant (HUF) vs Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5871/2026 & CM APPL. 28845/2026 RAMAKANT (HUF) .....Petitioner Through: Mr. R.K.Gupta and Ms. Rachna Agrawal, Advs.versusASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Agarwal, SSC, Ms. Monica Benjamin, Mr. Gibran Naushad, JSCs, Mr. Rohit Chakraborty and Ms. Nancy Jain, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARORDER% 29.04.20261. The present writ petition is directed against order dated 27.01.2026 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi Bench A, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal).2. Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the Tribunal has wrongly remanded the matter back to the Assessing Officer (AO) observing that the CIT(A) had not called for a remand earlier.3. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, we are of the view that the petition is misconceived:(i) Firstly, because the statute provides a remedy of ap...
Bachchu Singh vs the State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3281/2026, CRL.M.A. 13335/2026 BACHCHU SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pawan Kumar and Mr. Ashish Kumar Siwas, Advs.versusTHE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP with Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh and Ms. Upasana Bakshi, Advs. Mr. Dilip Kumar and Mr. Shashi Kumar, Advs. for R-2CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 29.04.20261. By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.595/2016 dated 25.09.2016 registered at PS: Amar Colony under Sections 448/354B/354D/506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and all proceedings emanating therefrom in view of Memorandum of Settlement cum Understanding dated 17.04.2026 [Annexure L] entered inter se the petitioner and the respondent no.2, which is accompanied by their respective affidavit(s) and proof(s) of identity.2. Issue notice.3. Learned APP ...
- ‹ Prev
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- Next ›
- Last »