Delhi Court April 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Preeti vs University Grants Commission & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3606/2020 & CM APPL. 12838/2020 PREETI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Adv. (appearance not given)versusUNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, SC GNCTD Services with Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Vedansh Anand, SPC with Mr. Kush Garg, Adv. for UOICORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 29.04.20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia seeking the following prayers :- (a) A Writ of Certiorari Calling for the Records of the Case for Perusal;(b) A Writ of Certiorari quashing the action 6f theRespondents in not issuing to the petitioner, till date, the degree for B.Ed. (Special Education) Course for the academic Session 2013-14 despite having issued mark sheet in respect thereof to her in January 2015, being illegal, arbitrary, malafide, in bad faith, unjust, unfair andwithout cause/ jurisdiction and in violat...
Abdul Rab vs Narcotics Control Bureau
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.REV.P. 271/2026, CRL.M.A. 13311/2026, CRL.M.A. 13310/2026 & CRL.M.A. 13309/2026 ABDUL RAB .....Petitioner Through: Mr. M. L. Yadav, Advocate.versusNARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAORDER% 29.04.20261. Matter taken up on mentioning.2. Learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission to withdraw thispetition with liberty to file afresh after rectifying certain technical defects, which according to him came up.3. As requested, the petition and the accompanying applications aredismissed as withdrawn with liberty as sought. GIRISH KATHPALIA, J APRIL 29, 2026/drThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/04/2026 at 12:40:45...
Smt. Karam Wati vs State Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 1336/2026 SMT. KARAM WATI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Piyush Garg, Mr. Ajay Kumar Yadav, Ms. Ananya Chopra, Mr. Rajat Yadav, Mr. Ajeet Yadav, Advs.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel, with Mr. Abhinav Kumar Arya, Mr. Aryan Sachdeva, Ms. Priyam Aggarwal, Advs. for State. Mr. Sateyn Srivastva, Adv. for Ms. Kavita.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJAORDER% 29.04.20261. This petition has been filed under Article 226 of theConstitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking issuance of a Writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus for the production of Ms. Kavita.2. Ms. Kavita has appeared before us in person. She submits thatpresently she is staying alone and does not wish to stay with the petitioner or the respondent no. 3.3. She is aged about 30 years and from the in...
Pankaj Kumar vs the State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1606/2026, CRL.M.A. 12914/2026 PANKAJ KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vineet Jain, Advocate.versusTHE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Tarang Srivastava, APP SI Chetan, PS Paschim Vihar.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 29.04.20261. By way of the present application, the applicant seeks interim bailfor a period of 30 days in connection with FIR No. 719/2023 dated 14.05.2023, registered at Police Station Paschim Vihar, Delhi, under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, as well as Sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act, 1959.2. After some arguments, Mr. Vineet Jain, learned counsel for theapplicant, seeks permission to withdraw the present application.3. The application is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.4. It is clarified that this Court has not made any observations on themerits of the case, and all rights and contentions of the parties are kept open...
Uttar Pradesh Roller Sports Sangh vs Roller Skating Federation of Indi ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
$~59 & 60* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5570/2026 & CM APPL. 27137/2026 & CM APPL. UTTAR PRADESH ROLLER SPORTS SANGH .....PetitionerThrough: Mr. Abhimanyu A. Walia and Mr. Kamakshraj Singh, Advocate for R-2. + W.P.(C) 5586/2026 & CM APPL. 27298/2026 ODISHA ROLLER SKATING ASSOCIATION .....PetitionerThrough: Mr. Aveak Ganguly, Advocate for R- 1. Mr. Abhimanyu A. Walia and Mr. Kamakshraj Singh, Advocates for R- 2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 29.04.20261. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners seeks liberty towithdraw the instant writ petitions with liberty to file properly constituted writ petitions with proper authorization.2. Liberty, so prayed for, is granted.3. With aforesaid observations, the instant petitions stand dismissed aswithdrawn.PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J APRIL 29, 2026/SH...
Ms Lunar Consultants and Developers vs Delhi Development Authority and ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5614/2026, CM APPL. 27520/2026 and CM APPL. 27521/2026 MS LUNAR CONSULTANTS AND DEVELOPERS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Bhadresh Harikant, Adv.versusDELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Vashishtha, Mr. Siddhartha Goswami, Mr. Krish Bhatia, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 29.04.20261. The only contention of the learned counsel representing thePetitioner is that the Petitioners technical bid has been rejected by the Respondents without disclosing any reason.2. Learned counsel representing the Respondents submits thatthere is no objection to supplying the reasons for the rejection of the Petitioners technical bid.3. In view of the above, the present Petition is disposed of with adirection to the Respondents to supply the reasons for rejecting the Petitioners technical bid within a period of one week from today.4. A...
Manorama Dash vs Dinesh Kumar & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 984/2026 MANORAMA DASH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pratap Ranjan Sahani Adv. Mr. Monoranjan Padhi Adv. and Ms. Shahina Adv.versusDINESH KUMAR & ORS. .....Respondent Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYALORDER% 29.04.2026 CM APPL. 28757/2026, CM APPL. 28758/2026 (Exemption)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Applications are accordingly disposed of. CM(M) 984/20261. This petition has been filed seeking directions to Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal [MACT], East, Karkardooma Courts, to expeditiously dispose of the matter which has been pending before it, being, MACT No.2. Mr. Pratap Ranjan Sahani, counsel for petitioner, states that thematter was put up for orders on 31st May 2024, after directing for submissions to be filed on 29th May 2024. Thereafter, on perusal of the records, it was revealed that Investigating Officer (IO) had not attached a particular document, which was required as part of the inqui...
Sh. Shehzad & Ors. vs the State (Govt of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 29th April, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 3290/2026 & CRL.M.A. 13363/2026 SH. SHEHZAD & ORS. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. R.P.S. Bhatti, Advocate.versusTHE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP for the State with SI Vikram Singh and SI Devender Kumar. Respondent No.2 in person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINJ U D G M E N T (oral)1. Petitioners herein seek quashing of FIR No. 0733/2021 dated therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.2. The marriage between petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2 was solemnized on 16.01.2019, as per Muslim rites and ceremonies. They were blessed with a baby girl, who is presently with the mother i.e. respondent No.2 herein.3. However, on account of some temperamental differences between the parties, they started residing separately since 2021 and on the basis of report lodged by respondent no. 2, abovesaid FIR ...
Brilliant Metals Private Limited vs Joint Commissioner Adjudication Cg ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
$~78, 79 & 81* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5814/2026 & CM APPL. 28621/2026, CM APPL. JBN IMPEX PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER ADJUDICATION CGST DELHI NORTH & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shlok Chandra, Senior Standing Counsel for CGST with Mr Parikshit Singh Bhati and Ms Lolita Crasta, Advocates for R-1 to 3.+ W.P.(C) 5838/2026 & CM APPL. 28670/2026, CM APPL. BRILLIANT METALS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner JOINT COMMISSIONER ADJUDICATION CGST DELHI NORTH & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Anushree Narain, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Yamit Jetley, Adv. + W.P.(C) 5866/2026 & CM APPL. 28734/2026, CM APPL. PROGRESSIVE ALLOYS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner JOINT COMMISSIONER ADJUDICATION CGST DELHI NORTH & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Appearance not given.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBREHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAULORDER% 29.04.20261. Heard.2. The prayer in the ...
Tadvi Aapsar Tasbir vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5840/2026 and CM APPL. 28674/2026 TADVI AAPSAR TASBIR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Prashant Mishra, Mr. Sumant Datt and Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Harsh Choudhary, CGSC along with Mr. Vidur Dwivedi, GP and SI Ajay Pal and SI Athurv CRPF.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 29.04.20261. The limited prayer made by the Petitioner is with regard to thedirection to the Respondents to consider and decide the statutory Departmental Appeal filed by the Petitioner under Rule 28 of the Central Reserve Police Force Rules, 1955 in a time bound period.2. Mr. Harsh Choudhary, Central Government Standing Counselwhile entering appearance on behalf of the Respondents has produced a copy of the order dated 02.08.2025 passed by the competent authority, while deciding the Petitioners Appeal. In view thereof, the present Petition is re...
- ‹ Prev
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- Next ›
- Last »