Delhi Court April 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Progressive Alloys (India) Private Limited vs Joint Commissioner Adjud ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
$~78, 79 & 81* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5814/2026 & CM APPL. 28621/2026, CM APPL. JBN IMPEX PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER ADJUDICATION CGST DELHI NORTH & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shlok Chandra, Senior Standing Counsel for CGST with Mr Parikshit Singh Bhati and Ms Lolita Crasta, Advocates for R-1 to 3.+ W.P.(C) 5838/2026 & CM APPL. 28670/2026, CM APPL. BRILLIANT METALS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner JOINT COMMISSIONER ADJUDICATION CGST DELHI NORTH & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Anushree Narain, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Yamit Jetley, Adv. + W.P.(C) 5866/2026 & CM APPL. 28734/2026, CM APPL. PROGRESSIVE ALLOYS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner JOINT COMMISSIONER ADJUDICATION CGST DELHI NORTH & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Appearance not given.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBREHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAULORDER% 29.04.20261. Heard.2. The prayer in the ...
Suleman Husain vs Bar Council of India
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5843/2026 SULEMAN HUSAIN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shiva Tiwari, Mr. Asif Iqbal Advocates.versusBAR COUNCIL OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 29.04.20261. The complaint itself has emanated from the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh. It is the said decision which was taken by the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh under challenge before the Bar Council of India.2. The Court thus finds that the material integral and essential part ofcause of action has arisen outside the jurisdiction of this Court, merely on the ground that the appeal is pending before the Bar Council of India should not be the sole factor to invoke the jurisdiction.3. The petitioner at this stage seeks liberty to withdraw the instant writ petition with liberty to approach the jurisdictional High Court. The liberty stands granted.4. The instant petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR K...
Sachin Jain vs ICICI Bank Ltd
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 753/2026 SACHIN JAIN .....Petitioner Through: Mr Kshitiz Jain, Mr Ayush Singhal, Mr Rohan Chandra, Advs.versusICICI BANK LTD ....Respondent Through: Mr. Sameer Parekh, Adv., Ms. Swati Bhardwaj, Adv.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 29.04.20261. This is a contempt petition filed under Section 12 of the Contempt ofCourts Act, 1971 read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India seeking contempt proceedings against the respondent bank for wilful disobedience of the directions passed in the Order dated 25.03.2026 in W.P. (C) 3887/2026.2. For the reasons stated in the petition, issue notice.3. It is stated that despite the order, credit card dues were deducted from the account of the petitioner on 30.03.2026 and 08.04.2026.4. Mr. Parikh, learned counsel appearing on advance notice, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent and states that the same occurred due to an inadvertent error and the correction was made im...
Mahant Vinod Kumar Sharma & Ors. vs the State Govt of Nct of Delhi and ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3304/2026 & CRL.M.A. 13407/2026 MAHANT VINOD KUMAR SHARMA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. D.S. Kohil, Mr. Yash Luthra, Mr. Yash Kadyan, Mr. Mihir and Mr. Sachin Kumar, AdvocatesversusTHE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the State with Mr. Gaurav Bisht and Ms. Anita Bisht, Advocates Mr. Vipul Sharma, Advocate for R-2 along with R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 29.04.2026 CRL.M.A. 13408/2026 (exemption)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 3304/20263. By way of present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIRbearing no. 142/2013, registered at Police Station Kotwali, Delhi, for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 147/148/323/380/452/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter IPC).4. Thereafter, chargesheet was filed on 02.08.2013, and Section 411 of IPC was added....
Sudhir Bajaj vs the State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi) & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3308/2026, CRL.M.As. 13427-13429/2026 SUDHIR BAJAJ .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pritish Sabharwal, Advocate.versusTHE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Tarang Srivastav, APP for State with SI Sumeet Punia, P.S. Vivek Vihar. Mr. Santosh Kumar Rout, Advocates for R4/PNB.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 29.04.20261. By way of the present petition under Section 528 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner assails the impugned orderdated 21.04.2026, whereby the Sessions Court dismissed his revision petition against the order dated 28.07.2023 passed by the Magistrates Court, directing the concerned Station House Officer to register an FIR.2. After some arguments, Mr. Pritish Sabharwal, learned counsel forthe petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition, without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioner in the pending criminal proc...
Manoo Maharaj Rishi & Anr. vs the State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3301/2026 MANOO MAHARAJ RISHI & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Mamta Garg, Mr. Anmol Aggarwal, Ms. Mukta Garg and Mr. Vishal Choudhary, Advs. with petitioners in personversusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State with Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh, Mr. Apoorv Khosla and Ms. Vanshika Singh, Advocates SI Pooja and SI Usha Rawat PS.: Malviya Nagar, Delhi Mr. Ravi Sharma, Ms. Srishti Sharma, Mr. Pulkit Luthra and Mr. Harshit Luthra, Advs. for R-2 with R-2 in personCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 29.04.20261. By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. 34/2018 dated 13.02.2018 registered at PS.: Malviya Nagar, Delhi under Section 498A/406/377/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and all proceedings emanating therefrom, in view of the Memorandum o...
Manish vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
$~77 & 82* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1652/2026 & CRL.M.A. 13383/2026 MANISH Through: Mr. Mehul Sharma, Mr. Nagesh Sharma, Mr. Lalit Kumar, Mr. Tarun Raj and Mr. Saurabh Kumar Manu, Advocates. STATE NCT OF DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1643/2026 & CRL.M.A. 13266/2026 RAJU SHAH Through: Ms. Dolly Sharma, Advocate. STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANRCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 29.04.20261. Both the applicants i.e. Manish and Raju Shah seek regular bail in the ongoing murder trial related to case in FIR No.0236/2016 dated 20.05.2016, registered at P.S. Khyala. BAIL APPLN. 1652/2026 & BAIL APPLN. 1643/2026 12. The prime-most contention raised by the applicants herein is that thereis long incarceration period as they both are behind the bars for more than seven years. It is submitted that all the material public witnesses, including eye-witnesses, have been examined, and since there are still 12 witnesses remaining to be examined, there is no li...
Hari Singh vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5846/2026 and CM APPL. 28678/2026 HARI SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. R.K. Shukla, AdvocateversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ashish Goyal, SPC with Mr. Himanshu, GP and Dr. Anurag Singhal, Advocate for R1 Mr. Devvrat Yadav, SPC & Mr. Gaurav Patel, GP Mr. Satish Aggarwala, Sr. Standing Counsel and Mr. Gagan Vaswani, Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 and 3CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKARHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLAORDER (ORAL)% 29.04.2026C.HARI SHANKAR, J.1. The petitioner was admitted as LDC in 1982.2. It is not necessary for us to recall all the facts in the case.Suffice it to state that in 2025, the petitioner filed OA 4117/2025 before the Central Administrative Tribunal seeking ante dating of the promotion which was granted to him in 1990. W.P.(C) 5846/2026 Page 1 of 23. The Tribunal has held the OA to be hopelessly barred by time.4. The OA was accompanied by an appl...
Santosh Mahajan vs Shachi Mahajan
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2909/2026, CRL.M.A. 11852-11853/2026 SANTOSH MAHAJAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anshul Mittal, Mr. Sparsh Agarwal and Mr. Vaibhav Garg, Advs.versusSHACHI MAHAJAN .....Respondent Through: Respondent through VCCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 29.04.20261. By virtue of the present petition under Sections 528 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner seeks setting aside of theorder dated 11.02.2026 passed by the learned Principal District andSessions Judge, East District Karkardooma Courts (learned Appellate Court), Delhi in C.A. No.211/2024, by virtue whereof the application of the petitioner herein/ appellant therein under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 (Limitation Act) seeking condonation of delay in filing the said appeal was dismissed and thereby consequently dismissed his appeal.2. Issue notice.3. Respondent in person appearing through video conferencing...
All India Institute of Medical Sciences (Aiims) vs Dr. Rakesh Lodha & ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5198/2026 and CM APPLs. 25464-465/2026 ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (AIIMS) .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Tanveer Oberoi, AdvocateversusDR. RAKESH LODHA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Geetanjali Mohan, AdvocateCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKARHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLAJUDGMENT (ORAL)% 29.04.2026C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. This writ petition assails judgment dated 25 July 2025 institutedby the respondents before the Central Administrative Tribunal1. The respondents are Professors in the All India Institute of Medical Sciences2. They had been appointed on ad hoc basis between 1997 and 1999. They continued on ad hoc basis till 2005.2. In 2005, Advertisement 03/2005 (FC) was issued by the AIIMSfor recruiting Professors in the disciplines which were held by the respondents.1 the Tribunal, hereinafter 2 AIIMS, hereinafter W.P.(C) 5198/2026 Page 1 of 103. The respondents ...
- ‹ Prev
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- Next ›
- Last »