Delhi Court April 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Asha Chitkara vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4139/2026, CM APPL. 20162/2026 & CM APPL. ASHA CHITKARA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Uttam Dutt, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Mahima Anand, Ms. Sonakshi Singh, Mr. Kumar Bhaskar, Mr. Divesh and Mr. Ishendra Kr. Singh, Advocates.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI (MCD) & ANR......Respondents Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, SC and Mr. Fajallu Rehman, Advocates. Mr. Sanjay Rai, ASO, L&E, MCD.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMAORDER% 29.04.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution ofIndia, 1950 seeks the following prayers: - a) Issue a writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction thereby quashing and setting aside the Judgment dated 27.10.2025 passed by the learned Principal District & Sessions Judge (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in PPA No. 30151/2016, whereby the eviction order dated 27.01.2016 p...
Govt of Nct of Delhi vs M/S Tewatia Construction Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 29.04.2026 + O.M.P. (COMM) 118/2024 & I.A. 5677/2024 (Stay) GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Lalltaksh Joshi and Ms. Minu Kumari, Advocates.versusM/S TEWATIA CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD .....Respondent Through: Mr. Avinash Trivedi, Mr. Rahul Aggarwal and Mr. Rhythem Nagpal, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHANSHANKAR% JUDGEMENT (ORAL)HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J.1. The present Petition has been filed under Section 34 of theArbitration and Conciliation Act, 19961, seeking to challenge the Arbitral Award dated 14.10.20232, rendered by the learned Arbitrator, Mr. Kamlesh Kumar (Former ADG, CPWD), in arbitral proceedings titled M/s Tewatia Construction Private Limited and Union of India.2. By way of the Impugned Award, the Government of NCT ofDelhi, through Executive Engineer (C), Edu, Maint. Divn., North- Wast Division, Public Works Department [PWD], Delhi3, ...
Mohan Singh Market Automobile Workshop Welfare Association vs Union of ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4453/2026 & CM APPL. 21785/2026MOHAN SINGH MARKET AUTOMOBILE WORKSHOPWELFARE ASSOCIATION .....Petitioner Through: Mr. K. Venkatraman and Mr. Avinash, AdvocatesversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh, CGSC with Mr. Srikant Singh, Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Mr. Srajan S. Kulshrestha and Mr. Anurag Pandey, Advocates along with Ms. Disha Choudhary, G.P., ASI Rajender Singh, P.S. Kotla Mubarakpur for R-1, R-3, R-4 andR-5Mr. Aditya Bharat Manubarwala and Ms. Charvi Virmani, Advocates forMCDCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 29.04.20261. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:-W.P.(C) 4453/2026 Page 1 of 32. Along with the petition, photographs have been filed to show theencroachments in the INA Market.3. Attention of the Court has been drawn to a communication dated 23rdMarch, 2025, sent by the respondent no.1 to the respondent no.2/M...
Mayaland Properties Private Limited vs Deputy Commissioner of Income T ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4403/2026 CM APPL. 21462/2026 STAYCM APPL. 21463/2026 EXEMMAYALAND PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kapil Sankhla, Mr. Pankaj Kapoor, Mr. Nitin Gulati, Mr. Saurabh Gangawar, Mr. Vipul Grover and Ms. Richa Sharma, Advs.versusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 16(1),DELHI & ORS......Respondent Through: Mr. Shlok Chandra, Sr. Std. Counsel with Ms. Naincy Jain, Ms. Madhavi Shukla, Jr. SCs and Mr. Udit Dad, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARORDER% 29.04.20261. By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged theAssessment Order dated 21.03.2026 on the ground that the principles of natural justice have been violated.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that during the course ofthe assessment proceedings under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act of 1961) for the Assessm...
Mr. K.P.Rao vs Amateur Kabaddi Federation of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
$~13 to 15* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3703/2021, CM APPL. 11227/2021, CM APPL.MR. K.P.RAO .....Petitioner Through: None.Through: Mr. Ankur Yadav (SPC) with Mr. Kartik Sharma, Advocate. Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate, Ms. Ruby Singh Ahuja, Mr. Sidharth Chopra, Mr. Nitin Sharma, Mr. Ranjeet Singh Sidhu, Ms. Swikriti Singhania, Ms. Kritika Sachdeva, Mr. Tribhuvan Narain Singh, and Mr. Abhay Aren, Advocates for R-6 + W.P.(C) 8742/2021, CM APPL. 27241/2021 Maurya,Mr. Krishna Chaitanya, Mr. Divyansh Singh Dev, Advocates forUOI.Mr. Rajesh Kumar and Mr. Changez Khan, Advocate for CBI.+ W.P.(C) 11216/2024AMATEUR KABADDI FEDERATION OF INDIA, THROUGHITS ADMINISTRATOR AND ORS.Maurya, Mr. Krishna Chaitanya and Mr.Divyansh Singh Dev, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 29.04.20261. The order dated 28.07.2025 would indicate that the hearing of thesecases was deferred awaiting the outcome of the proceedings pending before t...
Harshita Gupta vs Nimit Gandhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 29th April, 2026 + CRL.REV.P.(MAT.) 180/2026&CRL.M.A. 10263/2026 HARSHITA GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Ruchi Munjal, Advocate.versusNIMIT GANDHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rakesh Khanna, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Aseem, Ms. Seema Seth, Ms. Muskaan Deswal, Ms. Kashish Jain, Mr. Sourav Kumar, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINJ U D G M E N T (oral)1. The point raised in the present petition is very short and precise.2. Petitioner had filed a complaint under Section 12 of Protection ofWomen from Domestic Violence Act (PWDV Act) and, inter alia, prayed for maintenance and alternate accommodation or rent @Rs.75,000/- per month.3. On 25.08.2023, her application under Section 23 of PWDV Act wasdisposed of.4. No relief was granted to her as learned Magisterial Court came to theopinion that it was not a case where complainant was unable to maintain herself and that she had capacity to work and m...
United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Bhawna Walia & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of decision: 29th April 2026+ MAC.APP. 338/2019 & CM APPL. 10717/2019 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD .....Appellant Through: Ms. Mouli Sharma, Adv. for Ms. Suman Bagga, Adv.versusBHAWNA WALIA & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Dhananjay Gupta, Adv. for R-1 &2CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYALJUDGMENTANISH DAYAL, J (ORAL)1. This appeal has been filed by the Insurance Company challengingAward dated 13th December 2018 passed by MACT, East District: Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in Suit no. D-11324/16, granting compensation of Rs.32,34,000/- with interest @ 9% per annum.2. The primary ground for challenge, as per Ms. Mouli Sharma, counselfor appellant/Insurance Company, is that the benchmark income was considered at Rs. 20,000/- per month relying on the ITR for A.Y. 2015-16, showing gross income of Rs.2,29,550/-.3. The dependency was calculated on this basis by adding 40% towardsfuture prospects and deducting ...
Rajesh Khanna vs Naresh Kumar Gupta
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA 192/2024, CM APPL. 54465/2024 (stay) RAJESH KHANNA .....Appellant Through: Counsel for Appellant (appearance not given)versusNARESH KUMAR GUPTA .....Respondent Through: NoneCORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 29.04.20261. Learned counsel for the Appellant, on instructions, states that thematter has been amicably settled and seeks permission to withdraw the Appeal.2. The same statement has been made before the learned Registrar on10.04.2026.3. None is appearing on behalf of the Respondent.4. In view of the submissions made, the Appeal is permitted to bewithdrawn and disposed of accordingly. The pending Application also stands disposed of.NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, JAPRIL 29, 2026/RSThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/05/20...
Mentaura Technologies Pvt Ltd vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 29th April, 2026 + W.P.(C) 4449/2026 & CM APPL. 21781/2026 MENTAURA TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Kumar Pathak, Mr. Yash Kotak & Mr. Rohan Khanna, Advs.versusPRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI.....Respondent Through: Mr. Gaurav Gupta, SSC with Mr. Shivendra Singh, JSC, Mr. Yojit Pareek, JSC & Mr. Surya Jindal, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARJUDGMENTDINESH MEHTA, J. (ORAL)1. By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged theorder dated 05.12.2025 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax, CCIT,Delhi-4 (hereinafter referred to as the Commissioner), whereby the petitioners application under Section 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act of 1961) has been rejected.2. The facts germane for the present case are that with a view to availbenefits of Section 115BAA of t...
M/S Utkarsh Enterprises & Ors. vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 10.04.2026Judgment pronounced on: 29.04.2026Judgment uploaded on: 29.04.2026+ W.P.(C) 4487/2026 & CM APPL. 21853/2026, CM APPL. M/S UTKARSH ENTERPRISES & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Diya Kapur, Senior Advocate with Ms. Aanchal Basur, Advocate.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Devvrat Yadav (SPC) with Mr. Kush Garg and Mr. Girish Kumar, Advocates for UOI. Mr. Sameer Vashisth Standing Counsel for GNCTD, (Civil) alongwith Mr. Sumit K. Batra, Ms. Harshita Nathrani and Ms. Priyanka Jindal, Advocates and Mr. Ajay Kumar, LA (Sports) & Mr. Sandeep Dabas, OSD,PE & NI.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANJUDGMENTANIL KSHETARPAL, J.:1. By way of the present Petition under Article 226 of theConstitution of India, the Petitioners assail seven different Tender processes initiated by the Directorate of Education, Government of NCT of De...
- ‹ Prev
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- Next ›
- Last »