Delhi Court April 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ministry of Road Transport and Highways Government of India Through Of ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P. (COMM) 98/2026, I.A. 4985/2026 & I.A. 4986/2026MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYSGOVERNMENT OF INDIA THROUGH OFFICE OF CHIEFENGINEER .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Atmaja Sharma, Advocate (through VC)versusMS TRG INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED THROUGHAUTHORISED SIGNATORY .....Respondent Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 30.04.20261. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw thewrit petition.2. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. All pending applicationsstand dismissed.AVNEESH JHINGAN, JAPRIL 30, 2026/daThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/05/2026 at 12:23:09...
Syeeda Abida vs Narcotics Control Bureau
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1071/2026 & CRL.M.A. 8018/2026SYEEDA ABIDA.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Siddharth Satija, DHCLSC with Mr. Akash Sachan, Mr. Anuka Bachawat, Ms. Charu Sinha and Ms. Khushboo, Advocates.versusNARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU.....Respondent Through: Mr. Arun Khatri, SSC with Ms. Shelly Dixit, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 30.04.20261. Applicant seeks regular bail in NCB case No. VIII/08/DZU/2023 dated10.03.2023, registered by NCB, Delhi Zonal Unit, for commission of offences under Sections 8(c), 22(c), 23(c), 29 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, 1985 (NDPS Act).2. As per the broad allegations and averments appearing in thecomplaint, a secret information was received with the vigilance section of CISF on 09.03.2023, that one Indian lady, intending to travel from Delhi to Doha by Qatar Airlines via Flight No. QR 4781, would come to Airport with huge quantity of narcotics.3. ...
Mis Georgina Cars vs Mis CARS24 Services Private Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 365/2026, I.A. 5396/2026 & I.A. 6359/2026 MIS GEORGINA CARS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Harsh Chauhan, Adv.versusMIS CARS24 SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Ms. Kashvi Dutta, Mr. Rudra Dutta, Mr. Anuj Mishra, Mr. Dev Sharma and Mr. Yaman Saini, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJANORDER% 30.04.20261. By way of this petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration andConciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter the Act) the petitioner seeks appointment of an arbitrator for adjudication of disputes between the parties arising out of Dealer Franchise Agreement dated 21.03.2025. Clause 21.3 is the arbitration clause.2. The disputes having arisen between the parties, the petitioner invokedarbitration clause vide legal notice dated 06.01.2026, which did not elicit any response.3. In these circumstances, the petitioner was constrained to file thepresent petition under Section 11 of the Act. Notice ...
Gulshan Khatri vs State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 847/2026 GULSHAN KHATRI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pardeep and Ms. Saumya Dwivedi, Advocates.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Shubhi Gupta, APP for the State. SI Sachin, P.S.: Baba Haridas Nagar.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 30.04.2026CRL.M.A. 13548/2026By way of the present application filed under section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present bail petition, with liberty to file afresh for the same relief before the learned sessions court. For the reasons stated in the application, which is duly supported by affidavit, the application is allowed. The application is disposed-of.BAIL APPLN. 847/2026In view of the order passed above, the petition is disposed-of as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed-for. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of. The date of 26.05.2026 given earlier, stands cancelled.ANUP...
Riyanshi Jha (Minor) vs Government of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2991/2026&CM APPL. 14452/2026RIYANSHI JHA (MINOR).....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sangeeth Mohan, Adv.versusGOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR......Respondent Through: Mr Dhruv Rohatgi Panel Counsel GNCTD Ms Chandrika Sachdeva Mr Dhruv Kumar, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 30.04.20261. Mr. Mohan, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks to withdraw thepresent writ petition.2. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.JASMEET SINGH, JAPRIL 30, 2026 / (MS)This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/05/2026 at 13:19:58...
Tropical Industries International Pvt Ltd vs Ashu Gupta & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 186/2025 TROPICAL INDUSTRIES INTERNATIONAL PVT LTD.....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Revanta Mathur and Mr. Rohin Koolwal, Advocates.versusASHU GUPTA & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Junaid Alam and Mr. S. Nithin, Advocates for D-1 to 3.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGHORDER% 30.04.20261. This suit is instituted on behalf of the Plaintiff inter alia seeking adecree of permanent injunction restraining Defendants No. 1 to 3 and all others acting on their behalf from manufacturing, selling, offering for sale, advertising, directly or indirectly dealing in any manner with any goods or services including but not limited to kitchen sinks, using the registeredNEELKANTH, and trademarks of the Plaintiff, amounting to infringement and passing off, amongst other reliefs.2. During the pendency of the suit, parties were referred for mediationbefore the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre, where they have am...
Vanessa Dougnac vs Union of India Through Joint Secretary Foreigners M ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3272/2024 and CM APPL. 13513/2024, CM APPL. 13514/2024VANESSA DOUGNAC.....Petitioner Through: Ms Vrinda Bhandari and Ms Nitya Jain, Advocates.versusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH JOINT SECRETARYFOREIGNERS MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS & ANR......Respondent Through: Mr Satya Ranjan Swain (CGSC) & Mr Kautilya Birat, Advocates forUOI.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 30.04.20261. Ms. Vrinda Bhandari, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits thatin view of subsequent development, the petition has been rendered infructuous.2. In view thereof, the petition, along with pending applications, standsdismissed as has been rendered infructuous.PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, JAPRIL 30, 2026aksThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/05/2026 at 12:44...
Hardwari Lal vs Bijender Gupta
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of Decision: 30th April, 2026 + CM(M) 1962/2024 & CM APPL. 11411/2024 HARDWARI LAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vinod Dubey and Mr. Anurag Dwivedi, Advs. along with Petitioner-in-person.versusBIJENDER GUPTA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rajeev Kumar Rai, Adv. along with Respondent-in-person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER (Oral)Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, J.1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 227of the Constitution of India, 1950 seeking following reliefs:(a) Allow the present petition and set aside orderdated 06.12.2023 passed by Ms. Shail Jain, principal district and session judge-cum-rent control tribunal East, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, in the RCT no. Control Tribunal has dismissed the appeal filed by the petitioner under section 38 of Delhi Rent Control Act.(b) Pass an order thereby status quo bemaintai...
Kamlesh Kumar Shukla vs State Govt of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 912/2026 KAMLESH KUMAR SHUKLA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aditya Aggarwal, Advocate via video-conferencing.versusSTATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Shubhi Gupta, APP for the State. SI Rahul, P.S.: Crime Branch.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 30.04.2026 Mr. Aditya Aggarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present bail petition, with liberty to file afresh for the same relief before the learned Special Judge on ground of parity and delay in trial. The petition stands disposed-of as withdrawn, with liberty to approach the learned Special Judge. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of. It is made clear that this court has not expressed any view on the merits of the matter.ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, JAPRIL 30, 2026dsThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning th...
91 Springboard Business Hub Pvt Ltd vs Tailored Management India Pvt L ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 430/2026 91 SPRINGBOARD BUSINESS HUB PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Varun Garg, AdvocateversusTAILORED MANAGEMENT INDIA PVT. LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Aishwarya Kaushiq, Mr. Lokesh Aidasani, Mr. Parv Lodha and Mr. Prashant M.S., Advs. Mob: 7726812478 Email: [email protected]:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNAORDER% 30.04.20261. Learned counsels for the parties submit that settlement talks betweenthe parties have failed.2. Considering the aforesaid, though learned counsel for the respondenthas raised certain objections, however, the objections as regards the merits of the claims raised by the petitioner, can be considered by the learned Arbitrator.3. At this stage, learned counsel for the respondent submits that therespondent would have counter claims of approximately Rs. 15 Lacs.4. This Court notes that the petitioner has claims of approximately Rs.Rs. 33,39,559/-.5. ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »