Delhi Court April 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Grena Limited vs Axon Medical Solutions Pvt Ltd and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
$~44 to 46 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 8/2025 & I.A. 1609/2025 GRENA LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Priya Adlakha, Mr. Sreejan Pankaj and Ms. Urvi Nama, Advocates. versusAXON MEDICAL SOLUTIONS PVT LTD AND ANR ....Respondents Through: Ms. Avsi Malik, Mr. Abhinav Sharma and Mr. Ujjwal Jain, Advocates for R-1 and R-2. Ms. Nidhi Raman, CGSC with Mr. Om Ram and Ms. Nidhi Singh, Advocates for R-2. (45) + C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 9/2025 & I.A. 1613/2025 GRENA LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Priya Adlakha, Mr. Sreejan Pankaj and Ms. Urvi Nama, Advocates. versusLALIT SHARMA AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Avsi Malik, Mr. Abhinav Sharma and Mr. Ujjwal Jain, Advocates for R-1 and R-2. Ms. Nidhi Raman, CGSC with Mr. Om Ram and Ms. Nidhi Singh, Advocates for R-2. (46) + CS(COMM) 48/2025, CCP(O) 53/2025, I.A. 1593/2025 & I.A. 1595/2025GRENA LIMITED .....Plaintiff Through: Ms. Priya Adlakha, Mr. Sreejan Pankaj and ...
Sporta Technologies Pvt Ltd vs Hillside (Sports) Enc and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 63/2022 & I.A. 6230/2023SPORTA TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Rohan Krishna Seth and Mr. Ritwik Marwaha, Advocates.versusHILLSIDE (SPORTS) ENC AND ORS ...Defendants Through: Mr. Rahul Ajatshatru, Mr. Vidushpat Singhania and Mr. Kartikeya Prasad, Advocates for D-1. Mr. Vikrant N. Goyal, Mr. Rattan Goyal, Mr. Yash Basoya and Mr. Inderpreeet Singh, Advocates for D-19.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELAORDER% 29.04.20261. In view of the noting in para 6 of the order dated 19.12.2025, this Courtis of the opinion that since the sporting events, which were the subject matter and the cause of action for the Suit having been filed, have concluded long ago, the relief of permanent injunction appears to have become infructuous due to efflux of time.2. In view of the above, the suit has become infructuous and is disposed ofas such.3. However, it is made clear that this Court has not ...
Bajaj Finance Limited vs Manish Singh @ Settlement Guru & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
$~42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 63/2026 BAJAJ FINANCE LIMITED .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Karan Luthra, Mr. Ankit Banati, Mr. Aarushi Tiku and Mr. Piyush Thanvi, Advocates versusMANISH SINGH @ SETTLEMENT GURU & ORS. ....Defendants Through: Mr. Ashwani Chand and Ms. Ritika Sehgal, Advocates for D-1. Ms. Amee Rana, Ms. Radhika Roy and Ms. Bhavnish Kaur, Advocates for D-2. Ms. Ekta Sharma, Mr. Vidit Tewari and Ms. Surabhi Katare, Advocates for D-3. Mr. Rohan Jaitley, CGSC with Mr. Akshay Sharma, GP, for D-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA ORDER % 29.04.2026 I.A. 11950/2026 (Under Order XIII Rule 3 of the CPC) 1. Learned counsel for the plaintiff states that since only the defendant no.1 is the contesting defendant in the array of parties, the others being the intermediaries i.e, defendant nos. 2/Meta Platform Inc., 3/Google LLC and 4/Union of India, the requirement to retain the said intermediaries as defendants to ...
Sunil Singh Chauhan vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 533/2026SUNIL SINGH CHAUHAN .....Applicant Through: Mr. Gajraj Singh, Ms. Sakshi Sachdeva, Adv.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Tarang Srivastava, APP SI Sahil, PS Budh ViharCORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 29.04.20261. By way of this application under Section 483 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the applicant seeks regular bail in connection with FIR No. 390/2025, dated 10.08.2025, registered at Police Station Budh Vihar, District Rohini, Delhi, under Sections 109(2)/118(1)/115(2)/126(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, [BNS] and Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act, 1959.2. I have heard Ms. Sakshi Sachdeva, learned counsel for theapplicant, and Mr. Tarang Srivastava, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The status report has also been placed on record.3. By order dated 06.02.2026, the Investigating Officer [IO] wasdirected to inform the comp...
Central Public Information Officer Hq, Western Air Command, Iaf vs San ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 205/2017 & CM APPL. 952/2017CENTRAL PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER HQ, WESTERNAIR COMMAND, IAF .....Petitioner Through: None.versusSANJEEV SHARMA .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 29.04.20261. None appears for the parties. None had appeared on the earlier dates.2. Accordingly, the instant petition along with pending applicationstands dismissed for want of prosecution.PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, JAPRIL 29, 2026/SHThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/05/2026 at 13:01:45...
Sundaram Gandhi vs State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 690/2026 SUNDARAM GANDHI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anubhav Singh, Mr. Nitin Kumar and Ms. Maria M., Advocates.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Shubhi Gupta, APP for the State. SI Hemant, IFSO/Special Cell.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 29.04.2026CRL.M.A. 13377/2026By way of the present application filed under section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the applicant/petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present bail petition; with liberty to file afresh for the same relief before the learned trial court. For the reasons stated in the application, which are duly supported by the affidavit, the application is allowed. The application is disposed-of.BAIL APPLN. 690/2026In view of the above, the present petition is disposed-of as withdrawn; with liberty as prayed for. It is further observed that, liberty granted to the petitioner by the learned Sessi...
Santosh Kumar vs Govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2250/2026 SANTOSH KUMAR ....Petitioner Through: Appearance not givenversusGOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Mayank Bamniyal, Adv. for R2 Mr. Puneet Yadav, Adv., SC for R3/MCD Mr. Yash Basoya, Ms. Nikita Goyal, Ms. Sonakshi Agarwal, Advs. for R4 Mr Ravi Mishra, Ms Tanisha Bhatia, Ms Anjali Chaudhary, Mr Daksh Sehgal, Advs. for R5CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 29.04.2026CM APPL. 28539/20261. This is an application filed under Section 151 of CPC, 1908 seekingthe following prayers:- (a) Issue the direction to the concerned agency i.e. respondent No.1,2 & 3 to take immediate step to stop the on- go1ng illegal and unauthorized construction over the said property i.e. 23-D, CA Block, Shalimar Bagh, North West, New Delhi and 24-D, CA Block, Shalimar Bagh, North West, New Delhi, in the interest of justice.(b) Pass ad-interim order/ orders thereby directing the abovesaid respondents to st...
Altmas vs the State Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 708/2026 ALTMAS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Alaminr, Advocate.versusTHE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for State with Mr. Gaurav Bisht and Ms. Ankita Bisht, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 29.04.20261. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant, at this stage,does not press the present application and seeks permission to withdraw the same.2. In view of the above, the present application stands dismissed aswithdrawn with liberty to file afresh.3. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith.DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, JAPRIL 29, 2026/vc/gjThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/05/2026 at 11:43:39...
Ht Happy Tummy Private Limited vs Shri Ajit Kumar Chadha and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
$~21 and 22* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO 42/2024 and CM APPL. 6911/2024 HT HAPPY TUMMY PRIVATE LIMITED .....Appellant Through: NoneversusSHRI AJIT KUMAR CHADHA AND ANR .....Respondents Through: None+ FAO 43/2024 and CM APPL. 6922/2024 HT HAPPY TUMMY PRIVATE LIMITED .....Appellant Through: NoneversusNARESH KUMAR CHADHA AND ANR .....Respondents Through: NoneCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIORDER% 29.04.20261. There is no appearance on behalf of the appellants for the last threedates of hearing. Even today, the appellants remained unrepresented.2. In view of the above, the present appeals are dismissed in default fornon-prosecution alongwith the pending applications.MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, JAPRIL 29, 2026naThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/05/2026 at 12:07:12...
Umesh Kumar vs State of Gnct Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 592/2026 & CRL.M.A. 5669/2026 UMESH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: NoneversusSTATE OF GNCT DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yasir Raug Ansari, ASC with W/SI Suman, PS JagatpuriCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAORDER% 29.04.20261. The petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No. 31/2026 of PS Jagatpuri foroffence under Section 123/64(1)/115(2) of BNS.2. None appears for petitioner. On last two consecutive dates also noneappeared for petitioner.3. The petition and the accompanying application are dismissed indefault.GIRISH KATHPALIA, JAPRIL 29, 2026/asThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/04/2026 at 13:45:03...
- ‹ Prev
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- Next ›
- Last »