Skip to content

Delhi Court April 2026 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Apr 30 2026

Jai Kishan Gupta vs Union of India & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-30-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on : 16.12.2025Pronounced on : 30.04.2026Uploaded on : 04.05.2026 + LA.APP. 227/2017, CM APPL. 20214/2025 JAI KISHAN GUPTA ....Appellant Through: Mr. Sumit Bansal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Mr. Udaibir Singh, Ms. Tulna Rampal, Ms. Samvartika Pathak, Mr. Utsav Garg, Mr. Pushkar Khanna, and Ms. Nikita Gupta, Advocates. Mr. Badal Dayal and Mr. Nishi Chauhan, Advocates.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Standing Counsel with Mrs. K.K. Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. Mohd Sueb Akhtar, Mr. Divakar Kapil, Advocates for UOI. Mr. Tarun Johri and Mr. Ankur Gupta, Advocates for DMRC. + LA.APP. 158/2017 M/S RELAXO FOOTWEARS LTD .....Appellant Through: Mr. Sumit Bansal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Mr. Udaibir Singh, Ms. Tulna Rampal, Ms. Samvartika Pathak, Mr. Utsav Garg, Mr. Pushkar Khanna and Ms. Nikita Gupta, Advocates. By:NIJAMUDDEEN ANSARI LA.APP. 227/2017 & 15...


Apr 30 2026

Union of India vs Gaurav Dua & Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-30-2026

$~J-87* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on : 16.12.2025Pronounced on : 30.04.2026+ LA.APP. 329/2017 UNION OF INDIA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Standing Counsel with Mrs. K. K. Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. Mohd. Sueb Akhtar, Mr. Divakar Kapil, Advs.versusGAURAV DUA & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Badal Dayal, Ms. Nishi Chauhan, Ms. Rachna Dayal, Advs.,CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIJUDGMENTFor detailed judgment, please refer to LA.APP. 227/2017 titled Jai Kishan Gupta Vs. Union Of India & Ors. and LA.APP. 158/2017 titled M/s Relaxo Footwears Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors. MANOJ KUMAR OHRI (JUDGE) APRIL 30, 2026/naSignature Not Verified Signature Not VerifiedDigitally Signed Digitally Signed By:MANOJBy:NIJAMUDDEEN ANSARI ...


Apr 30 2026

Union of India vs Suman Goel and Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-30-2026

$~J-92* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on : 16.12.2025Pronounced on : 30.04.2026+ LA.APP. 343/2017 UNION OF INDIA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Standing Counsel with Mrs. K. K. Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. Mohd. Sueb Akhtar, Mr. Divakar Kapil, Advs.versusSUMAN GOEL AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Appearance not givenCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIJUDGMENTFor detailed judgment, please refer to LA.APP. 227/2017 titled Jai Kishan Gupta Vs. Union Of India & Ors. and LA.APP. 158/2017 titled M/s Relaxo Footwears Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors. MANOJ KUMAR OHRI (JUDGE) APRIL 30, 2026/naSignature Not Verified Signature Not VerifiedDigitally Signed Digitally Signed By:MANOJBy:NIJAMUDDEEN ANSARI KUMAR OHRISigning...


Apr 30 2026

Union of India vs Arun Kumar and Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-30-2026

$~J-86* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on : 16.12.2025Pronounced on : 30.04.2026+ LA.APP. 328/2017 UNION OF INDIA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Standing Counsel with Mrs. K. K. Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. Mohd. Sueb Akhtar, Mr. Divakar Kapil, Advs.versusARUN KUMAR AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr.Sumit Bansal, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Badal Dayal, Mr.Udaibir Singh, Mr.Pankaj Gupta, Ms.Tulna Rampal and Ms.Nikita Gupta, AdvocatesCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIJUDGMENTFor detailed judgment, please refer to LA.APP. 227/2017 titled Jai Kishan Gupta Vs. Union Of India & Ors. and LA.APP. 158/2017 titled M/s Relaxo Footwears Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors. MANOJ KUMAR OHRI (JUDGE) APRIL 30, 2026/naSignature Not Verified Signature Not VerifiedDigitally Signed Digitally Signed By:M...


Apr 30 2026

Rishipreet Sachdeva vs Ravneet Kaur Sachdeva

Court: Delhi Orders

Decided on: Apr-30-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3061/2026, CRL.M.A. 12470/2026, CRL.M.A. RISHIPREET SACHDEVA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Prashant Mendiratta, Mr. Anirudh K. Mudgal, Mr. Shubhashish Sharma, Ms. Vaishnavi Saxena, Ms. Avni Soni & Ms. Sakshi Jain, Advocates.versusRAVNEET KAUR SACHDEVA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Chouhan, Mr. Ujjwal Singh Parmar & Ms. Neha Raj Singh, Advocates.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 30.04.20261. The present petition, under Section 528 of the Bharaitya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, arises out of complaint case [CT CaseWomen from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 [DV Act]. By an orderdated 09.04.2025, the Mahila Court closed the petitioners right to file a written statement in the proceedings. The petitioner assailed the saidorder before the Appellate Court, which upheld the said order vide orderdated 13.10.2025.2. In the course of hearing, learned counsel on both sides have come CRL.M.C. 3061/2026 Page 1 of 2to an...


Apr 30 2026

Manish Jain vs Akanksha Jain

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-30-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS.(CRL) 6/2014 MANISH JAIN .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Anirudh Mudgal, Ms.Vaishnavi Saxena & Ms.Avni Soni, Advs.versusAKANKSHA JAIN .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJAORDER% 30.04.20261. This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner underSection 12 read with Section 2(c)(ii) and (iii) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, stating that the respondent/contemnor, that is, his wife, had been filing false affidavits regarding her employment and income in the matrimonial proceedings pending between them, with the objective of obtaining favourable orders.2. It is stated that the same interferes with and obstructs the administration of justice. On the basis of the said affidavits, the interim maintenance in favour of the respondent/contemnor was fixedby this Court to the tune of Rs. 60,000/- per month, vide the judgmentdated 21.02.2014 passed in CM(M) No. 910/201...


Apr 30 2026

The Commissioner of Income Tax - International Taxation -2 vs Little F ...

Court: Delhi Orders

Decided on: Apr-30-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 356/2026 CM APPL. 29142/2026 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -2 .....Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia SSC with Mr. Anant Mann and Mr. Pratyaksh. Gupta, JSCs.versusLITTLE FAIRY LIMITED .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARORDER% 30.04.20261. By way of the instant appeal the Commissioner Income Tax haschallenged the order dated 25.09.2023 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bench D New Delhi in ITA No. 1512/DEL/2022 (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) for the Assessment Year 2016-17, whereby the Tribunal has annulled the Assessment order holding it to be time barred, as the Assessing Officer (AO) had passed draft assessment order for Assessment Year 2016-17 because as per the Tribunal, the AO could not have passed a draft assessment taking recourse to provision of Section 144C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter ref...


Apr 30 2026

Mohinder Srivastava & Anr vs Jag Mohan Sharma & Ors

Court: Delhi Orders

Decided on: Apr-30-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIIN + RFA 668/2018 MOHINDER SRIVASTAVA & ANR. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Dhurv Chhabra, AdvocateversusJAG MOHAN SHARMA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Dalip Mishra, Advocate for R-1CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 30.04.20261. This is a joint application filed under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) seeking withdrawal of the present appeal, in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties.2. Along with the application, the Memorandum of Settlement dated 18th March, 2026 has been filed recording the terms of the Settlement.3. The application has been duly signed by the parties and is supported by their respective affidavits.4. In view of the aforesaid settlement, the appellant is permitted to withdraw the present appeal.5. The application is disposed of consequently. RFA 668/2018 Page 1 of 2 RFA 668/20186. In view of the order passed above, the present appeal is dismissed a...


Apr 30 2026

Ajay Kumar Goel vs Union of India & Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-30-2026

$~J-17* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on : 16.12.2025Pronounced on : 30.04.2026+ LA.APP. 123/2017 AJAY KUMAR GOEL .....Appellant Through: Mr.L.B. Rai, Mr.Kartik Rai, Mr.Vineesh Tyagi, Mr.Satvik Rai, Mr.Ayush Pandita, Mr.Rohit Kumar, Mr.D.S. Lakra, Mr.Akash Parashar and Mr.Mohan Lal, Advocates Mr. Vibhor E. Garg, Mr. Achin Mittal, Mr. Aditya Parmar and Mr. Vikas Pandey, Advocates.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Standing Counsel with Mrs. K. K. Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. Mohd Sueb Akhtar, Mr. Divakar Kapil, Advs. for R-1/UOI. Mr. Tarun Johri and Mr. Ankur Gupta, Advocates for DMRCCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIJUDGMENTFor detailed judgment, please refer to LA.APP. 47/2017 titled Naveen Kumar Jain Vs. Union Of India & Ors. MANOJ KUMAR OHRI (JUDGE) APRIL 30, 2026 naSignature Not Verified Signature Not VerifiedDigitally Sign...


Apr 30 2026

Union of India vs Harish Vats & Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-30-2026

$~J-101* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on : 16.12.2025Pronounced on : 30.04.2026+ LA.APP. 208/2018, CM APPL. 45540/2018, CM APPL. 45541/2018, CM APPL. 45542/2018 UNION OF INDIA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Standing Counsel with Mrs. K. K. Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. Mohd. Sueb Akhtar, Mr. Divakar Kapil, Advs.versusHARISH VATS & ANR .....Respondents Through: Appearance not givenCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIJUDGMENTFor detailed judgment, please refer to LA.APP. 227/2017 titled Jai Kishan Gupta Vs. Union Of India & Ors. and LA.APP. 158/2017 titled M/s Relaxo Footwears Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors. MANOJ KUMAR OHRI (JUDGE) APRIL 30, 2026/naSignature Not Verified Signature Not VerifiedDigitally Signed Digitally Signed By:MANOJBy:NIJAMUDDEEN ANSARI ...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial