Skip to content

Delhi Court April 2026 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Apr 30 2026

Sewa Singh & Ors vs Union of India & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-30-2026

$~J-10* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on : 16.12.2025Pronounced on : 30.04.2026+ LA.APP. 64/2017 SEWA SINGH & ORS .....Appellants Through: Mr.L.B. Rai, Mr.Kartik Rai, Mr.Vineesh Tyagi, Mr.Satvik Rai, Mr.Ayush Pandita, Mr.Rohit Kumar, Mr.D.S. Lakra, Mr.Akash Parashar and Mr.Mohan Lal, AdvocatesversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Standing Counsel with Mrs. K. K. Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. Mohd Sueb Akhtar, Mr. Divakar Kapil, Advs. for R-1/UOI. Mr. Gyanendra Kumar, Advocate for DMRCCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIJUDGMENTFor detailed judgment, please refer to LA.APP. 47/2017 titled Naveen Kumar Jain Vs. Union Of India & Ors. MANOJ KUMAR OHRI (JUDGE) APRIL 30, 2026 naSignature Not Verified Signature Not VerifiedDigitally Signed Digitally Signed By:MANOJBy:...


Apr 30 2026

Tata Capital Limited vs Shree Ram Associates & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-30-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 30.04.2026 + ARB.P. 1567/2024 TATA CAPITAL LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nachiketa Vijay Suri , Mr Raj Kumar, Mr. Kashish Aggarwal, Ms. Shubhangi Singh and Ms. Puja Mann, Advocates.versusSHREE RAM ASSOCIATES & ORS. .....Respondents Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHANSHANKAR % JUDGEMENT (ORAL)1. The present Petition, under Section 11(6) of the Arbitrationand Conciliation Act, 19961, seeks the appointment of an Arbitrator for adjudication of disputes that are stated to have arisen inter se the parties in terms of Clause 19 of the Loan Agreement dated 30.01.20192. The said clause reads as follows: 19. DISPUTE RESOLUTION, GOYERNING LAW AND JURISDICTION 19.1 If any dispute, difference or claim arises between the Obligors and the Lender in connection with the Facility or the security or as to the interpretation, validity, implementation or effect of the Facility Documents or as to the r...


Apr 30 2026

Blackberry Limited vs Controller of Patents and Designs

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-30-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment delivered on: 30.04.2026 + C.A.(COMM.IPD-PAT) 14/2022 BLACKBERRY LIMITED .....AppellantversusCONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS .....Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case For the Appellant : Mr. Pravin Anand, Mr. Ashutosh Upadhyaya and Mr. Sandeep Bhola, Advocates. For the Respondent : Mr. P.S. Singh, CGSC with MR. Rajneesh Kr. Sharma, Ms. Minakshi Singh, Mr. Ashutosh Bharti and Ms. Shivangi Sharma, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAJUDGMENTTEJAS KARIA, J INTRODUCTION1. This is an Appeal filed under Section 117A of the Patents Act, 1970(Act) seeking quashing and setting aside of orders dated 11.10.2019 (Impugned Order I) and 05.03.2020 (Impugned Order II) passed by the Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs (Respondent / Controller) under Section 15 of the Act (Impugned Orders) refusing Signature Not Verified C.A.(COMM.IPD-PAT) 14/2022 Page 1 of 36 the Patent Application No. 1976/DEL/2008 filed on 20...


Apr 30 2026

Shripal Gupta vs Union of India and Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-30-2026

$~J-8* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on : 16.12.2025Pronounced on : 30.04.2026+ LA.APP. 61/2017 SHRIPAL GUPTA .....Appellant Through: Mr.L.B. Rai, Mr.Kartik Rai, Mr.Vineesh Tyagi, Mr.Satvik Rai, Mr.Ayush Pandita, Mr.Rohit Kumar, Mr.D.S. Lakra, Mr.Akash Parashar and Mr.Mohan Lal, AdvocatesversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Standing Counsel with Mrs. K. K. Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. Mohd Sueb Akhtar, Mr. Divakar Kapil, Advs. for R-1/UOI. Mr. Gyanendra Kumar, Advocate for DMRCCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIJUDGMENTFor detailed judgment, please refer to LA.APP. 47/2017 titled Naveen Kumar Jain Vs. Union Of India & Ors. MANOJ KUMAR OHRI (JUDGE) APRIL 30, 2026 naSignature Not Verified Signature Not VerifiedDigitally Signed Digitally Signed By:MANOJBy:NIJAMU...


Apr 30 2026

Prakash Chandra Yadav vs Directorate of Enforcement

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-30-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 30.04.2026 + MISC. APPEAL(PMLA) 19/2024 PRAKASH CHANDRA YADAV .....Appellant Through: Mr. Pavan Narang, Senior Advocate with Mr. Manish Shukla, Mr. Nilash Tiwari, Ms. Aishwarya Chhabra and Mr. Himanshu Sethi, Advocates.versusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT .....Respondent Through: Mr. Vivek Gurnani, Panel Counsel for ED with Mr. Kanishk Maurya, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJANAVIN CHAWLA, J. (ORAL)1. This appeal has been filed under Section 35 of the ForeignExchange Management Act, 1999 [hereinafter, FEMA] read with Section 54 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 [hereinafter, FERA], challenging the order dated 29.05.2024 passed by the learned Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange under SAFEMA [the Tribunal] in Appeal No. FPA-FE-311/DLI/2005, titled as, Shri Prakash Chandra Yadav vs. The Special Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi, inter alia dismiss...


Apr 30 2026

Union of India vs Lalita Dua & Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-30-2026

$~J-97* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on : 16.12.2025Pronounced on : 30.04.2026+ LA.APP. 58/2018 UNION OF INDIA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Standing Counsel with Mrs. K. K. Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. Mohd. Sueb Akhtar, Mr. Divakar Kapil, Advs.versusLALITA DUA & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Badal Dayal, Ms. Nishi Chauhan, Ms. Rachna Dayal, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIJUDGMENTFor detailed judgment, please refer to LA.APP. 227/2017 titled Jai Kishan Gupta Vs. Union Of India & Ors. and LA.APP. 158/2017 titled M/s Relaxo Footwears Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors. MANOJ KUMAR OHRI (JUDGE) APRIL 30, 2026/naSignature Not Verified Signature Not VerifiedDigitally Signed Digitally Signed By:MANOJBy:NIJAMUDDEEN ANSARI ...


Apr 30 2026

XX and Anr vs Yy

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-30-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 881/2025 and I.A. 20708/2025 HARDWYN INDIA LIMITED AND ANR .....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Gurvinder Singh, Advocate.versusRAJENNDRA ENGITECH LLP .....Defendant Through: Mr. Ayush Dey, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGHORDER% 30.04.20261. This suit is instituted on behalf of the Plaintiffs seeking decree of permanent/perpetual injunction against the Defendant and all others acting on behalf of the Defendant from using in any manner the impugned mark(s) HARDVIN and and/or any other mark or marks, identical to or deceptively similar to or containing any of the Plaintiffstrademarks HARDWYN, , , and/or any other HARDWYN trademark(s) either as a brand name, trademark, trading style, corporate name, domain name, metatag, hashtag, web-address or otherwise, on its website, social media webpages, online trade directories or otherwise for manufacturing, producing, offering for sale, selling, displaying, advertising, market...


Apr 30 2026

Nisha vs State Nct Ofdelhi and Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-30-2026

$~57 Q* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 5609/2025 NISHA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankur and Ms. Komal, Advocate.versusSTATE NCT OFDELHI AND ANR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP Mr. Parth Sharma, Counsel for R-2 SI Satish SinghCORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 30.04.20261. By way of the present petition under Section 528 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS] (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC]), the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No. 263/2022 dated 11.04.2022, registered under Sections 388 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [IPC] at Police Station Shakarpur, Delhi, on the ground of settlement between the parties.2. Issue notice. Mr. Hitesh Vali, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, accepts notice on behalf of the State. Mr. Parth Sharma, learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2.3. The petitioner is present in Court, and is identified by his learned counsel, as...


Apr 30 2026

Sangeeta vs Solomon David & Anr.

Court: Delhi Orders

Decided on: Apr-30-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 1433/2024 SANGEETA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. S. C. Sagar, Mr. Shishu Pal Sharma and Ms. Swati, Advs.versusSOLOMON DAVID & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Gaurav Dhingra and Mr. Shashank Singh, Advs. for R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 30.04.20261. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition inasmuch as the necessary compliance has been done by the respondents.2. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. SACHIN DATTA, J APRIL 30, 2026/clThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/05/2026 at 11:52:13...


Apr 30 2026

Harish Kumar Basnal vs Union of India & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-30-2026

$~J-14* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on : 16.12.2025Pronounced on : 30.04.2026+ LA.APP. 98/2017 HARISH KUMAR BANAAL .....Appellant Through: Mr.L.B. Rai, Mr.Kartik Rai, Mr.Vineesh Tyagi, Mr.Satvik Rai, Mr.Ayush Pandita, Mr.Rohit Kumar, Mr.D.S. Lakra, Mr.Akash Parashar and Mr.Mohan Lal, AdvocatesversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Standing Counsel with Mrs. K. K. Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. Mohd Sueb Akhtar, Mr. Divakar Kapil, Advs. for R-1/UOI. Mr. Tarun Johri and Mr. Ankur Gupta, Advocates for DMRCCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIJUDGMENTFor detailed judgment, please refer to LA.APP. 47/2017 titled Naveen Kumar Jain Vs. Union Of India & Ors. MANOJ KUMAR OHRI (JUDGE) APRIL 30, 2026 naSignature Not Verified Signature Not VerifiedDigitally Signed Digitally Sig...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial