Delhi Court April 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sivasundari Bose & Anr vs Davind Davidar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THEHIGH COURTOF DELHIAT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 30.04.2026 + CS(COMM) 706/2018 MR. DAVID DAVIDAR .....PlaintiffversusMS. SIVASSUNDARI BOSE ....Defendants + CS(COMM) 581/2024 SIVASUNDARI BOSE & ANR. .....PlaintiffsversusDAVID DAVIDAR ....Defendant Advocates who appeared in these cases Mr. Pravin Anand, Ms. Prachi Agarwal, Ms. Medha Singh and Mr. Manan Mondal, Advocates for Plaintiff in CS(COMM) 706/2018 and for Defendant in CS(COMM) 581/2024. Ms. Ritu Singh Mann, Mr. Sohrab Singh Mann and Ms. Shivani, Advocates for Defendant in CS(COMM) 706/2018 and for Plaintiffs in CS(COMM) 581/2024.CORAMHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAJUDGMENTTEJAS KARIA, J1. CS(COMM) 706/2018 [Originally CS(OS) 1953/2011] has been filedby Mr. David Davidar against Ms. Sivasundari Bose seeking a permanent injunction against her from making baseless threats of legal proceedings for copyright infringement and from making defamatory statements against Mr. David Davidar and to seek damages from Ms...
Resident Welfare Association vs Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 9240/2025 RESIDENT WELFARE ASSOCIATION .....Petitioner Through: None.versusDELHI URBAN SHELTER IMPROVEMENT BOARD & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ajay Vikram Singh, Ms. Priyanka Singh, Mr. M. Aamir Faiyaz and Mr. Rehan Khan, Advocates. Mr. Siddhant Nath, Standing Counsel and Mr. Amaan Khan, Advocate for MCD.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 30.04.20261. None appears for the petitioner. None had appeared for the petitioner even on 16.10.2025 and 18.02.2026.2. Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J APRIL 30, 2026 aksThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/05/2026 at 12:43:18...
Sh. Birender Prasad vs Sh. Kamal Chhabra
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
$~101 to 103* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHICRL.M.C. 5647/2022, CRL.M.A. 22280/2022 SH BIRENDER PRASAD .....Petitioner + CRL.M.C. 5650/2022, CRL.M.A. 22286/2022 CRL.M.C. 5658/2022, CRL.M.A. 22312/2022CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 30.04.20261. Learned counsel for the petitioner, alongwith petitioner present in person, seeks to withdraw the present petitions with liberty to initiate appropriate steps in accordance with law and/ or raising the very same contention before the learned Trial Court at the appropriate stage(s), as and when required.2. Accordingly, the present petitions, alongwith the pending applications are dismissed with liberty as prayed for.3. A copy of this order be kept in all the connected matters. SAURABH BANERJEE, J APRIL 30, 2026/bh...
Sh. Birender Prasad vs Sh. Kamal Chhabra
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
$~101 to 103* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHICRL.M.C. 5647/2022, CRL.M.A. 22280/2022 SH BIRENDER PRASAD .....Petitioner CRL.M.C. 5650/2022, CRL.M.A. 22286/2022 + CRL.M.C. 5658/2022, CRL.M.A. 22312/2022CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 30.04.20261. Learned counsel for the petitioner, alongwith petitioner present in person, seeks to withdraw the present petitions with liberty to initiate appropriate steps in accordance with law and/ or raising the very same contention before the learned Trial Court at the appropriate stage(s), as and when required.2. Accordingly, the present petitions, alongwith the pending applications are dismissed with liberty as prayed for.3. A copy of this order be kept in all the connected matters. SAURABH BANERJEE, J APRIL 30, 2026/bh...
State Nct of Delhi vs Ramesh @Udai @ Udda & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of reserving: 17th April, 2026 Date of Decision: 30th April, 2026 IN THE MATTER OF: + CRL.L.P. 70/2022 STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for State with SI Krishan Varma, PS Inder Puri Delhi.versusRAMESH @ UDAI @ UDDA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Manish Bhardwaj, Advocate for Respondent no.1 Ramesh. Mr. Amitej Kumar Nagar, Advocate for Respondent No.2 & 3.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL KUMAR YADAVJUDGMENTVIMAL KUMAR YADAV, J.1. The acquittal of the accused persons in case FIR No. 241/2017 (Ex.P1) registered with police of PS Inder Puri under section 307/34 of Indian Penal Code (IPC) 1860, did not go down well with the Prosecuting Agency, therefore, State invoked section 378 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) and filed the instant appeal (Crl.L.P.70/2022).2. While impugning the judgment dated 31.01.2020, it is asserted thatthe learned Trial Court fell into error by attaching ...
Fmc Corporation & Anr. vs Natco Pharma Limited
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 611/2019 FMC CORPORATION & ANR. .....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. George Vithayathil and Ms. Ahaana Singh Rana, Advocates.versusNATCO PHARMA LIMITED .....Defendant Through: Mr. J. Sai Deepak, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sidhant Goel, Mr. Aditya Goel, Mr. Deepankar Mishra, Mr. Kartikeya Tandon and Mr. Avinash Kumar Sharma, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGHORDER% 30.04.2026 I.A. 12183/20261. This application is filed jointly on behalf of Plaintiffs and the Defendant under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with 151 CPC for recordal of settlement between the parties.2. The suit was instituted by the Plaintiffs seeking permanent injunctionrestraining the Defendant and all others acting on its behalf from making, using, selling, distributing, advertising, exporting, offering for sale and in any other manner, directly or indirectly, dealing in any product that infringes the claimed subject matter or uses the processes claimed un...
Fmc Corporation & Ors. vs Natco Pharma Limited
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 607/2024 FMC CORPORATION & ORS. .....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. George Vithayathil and Ms. Ahaana Singh Rana, Advocates.versusNATCO PHARMA LIMITED .....Defendant Through: Mr. J. Sai Deepak, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sidhant Goel, Mr. Mohit Goel, Mr. Aditya Goel, Mr. Deepankar Mishra, Mr. Avinash K. Sharma and Mr. Kartikeya Tandon, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELAORDER% 30.04.2026 I.A. 12224/2026 in CS(COMM) 607/2024 (Under Order XXIII Rule 3, CPC)1. This is a joint application filed under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as CPC) seeking recordal of settlement between the parties.2. Learned counsel for the parties state that the inter se disputes have been resolved amicably out of Court.3. The terms of settlement is stated to have been recorded into writing videthe Settlement Agreement dated 31.03.2026. It is further stated by the learned counsel that the...
Abhishek Oberoi vs Bonny Chopra and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ FAO 298/2023, CM APPL. 59235/2023, CM APPL. 22429/2024 and CM APPL. 34607/2025 ABHISHEK OBEROI .....Appellant Through:Mr.K.K. Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Rajiv Bakshi and Mr.Ram Pravesh Rai, AdvocatesversusBONNY CHOPRA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through:Ms. Gita Dhingra, Advocate for respondent No.1CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIORDER% 30.04.20261. By way of the present appeal, the appellant, who was the defendantbefore the Trial Court, seeks to assail the order dated 23.09.2023, whereby the defendants application under Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter CPC) came to be dismissed by the learned ADJ-08, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in MISC DJ 122/2022.2. Briefly stated, the present appeal arises out of an ex-parte judgmentand decree dated 15.03.2021 passed by the Trial Court in a suit for recovery of Rs.13,75,000/- alongwith interest, wherein the defendant was proceeded ex-...
Raj Sharma & Anr vs Santosh Rani
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHICM APPL. 28914/2026 IN + RFA 1060/2019 RAJ SHARMA & ANR. .....Appellants Through: Ms. Renu Gupta, Advocate along for appellant no.1 with appellant no.1 in Ms. Pratiksha Jalan, Advocate for appellant no.2 with appellant no.2 inversusSANTOSH RANI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Vivek Kumar Tandon, Ms. Laxmi Gupta and Ms. Pooja Giri, Advocates along with respondent inCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 30.04.2026 CM APPL. 28914/2026 (for withdrawal of RFA 1060/2019)1. The present application has been filed on behalf of the appellantsunder Order XXIII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) seeking to withdraw the present appeal in view of the fact that the parties have settled their disputes amicably.2. Mr. Vivek Kumar Tandon, counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent does not oppose the same. RFA 1060/2019 Page 1 of 23. For the reasons stated the application is allowed. RFA 1060/20194. In view of the order passe...
Shahjad vs State Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 2748/2025 SHAHJAD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Bhanu Malhotra and Mr. Rishabh Atri, AdvocatesversusSTATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP for State/R-1 Insp. Satender Pal Singh and SI Vikram SinghCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 30.04.20261. Applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 0014/2019 dated 11.01.2019 registered at Police Station Welcome for commission of offence under Section 302/34 IPC.2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is behind the bars for more than 7 years.3. He submits that, so far, 16 out of 35 witnesses have been examined andsince there is no likelihood of trial getting completed in near future, keeping in mind the time already spent behind the bars by the applicant, he deserves bail.4. He also submits that there are, in all, 7 accused persons and, out ofthose, two are juvenile offenders whereas one is proclaimed off...
- ‹ Prev
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- Next ›
- Last »