Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Krishi Pragati Cooperative Ltd. vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 30th March, 2026. Uploaded on: 1st April, 2026.+ W.P.(C) 3956/2026 & CM APPL. 19306/2026 KRISHI PRAGATI COOPERATIVE LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Neeraj Malhotra, Sr. Adv., Mr. Bharadwaj S. Iyengar, Mr. Ashwin Kumar Nair, Mr. Porash Kumar and Mr. Nimish Kumar, Advocates (M: 9871900105).versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ripudaman Bhardwaj CGSC with Ms. Aparna, Advocate for UOI (M: 8178303621). Mr. Rohan Tripathi, GP. Mr. Manu Padalia Adv. with Mr. Bhanu Sanoriya Adv. for Respondent no. 4.CORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGHJUSTICE MADHU JAINPrathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner under Articles 226and 227 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, assailing the impugned orderdated 19th January, 2026 bearing File No.R-11017/39/2020-L&M issued by the Office of Central Registrar of Cooperativ...
Sterling Biotech Ltd vs Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 262/2018 & CRL.M.A. 1479/2018 STERLING BIOTECH LTD .....Petitioner Through: NoneversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms.Anubha Bhardwaj, SPP for CBI with Ms.Riddhi Grover, Ms.Ananya Shamshery, Advs. SI Ajeet Kumar.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJAORDER% 30.03.20261. None appears for the petitioner.2. Vide order dated 19.11.2025 read with order dated 17.12.2025,passed by the Supreme Court in W.P.(Crl.) 48/2020, titled Chetan Jayantilal & Ors. v. Central Bureau of Investigation & Ors. and another connected petition, the FIR No. RC 8(A)/AC-III/2017 dated 30.08.2017 and FIR No. RC/BD1/2017/E/0007 dated 25.10.2017, registered by the CBI have been quashed.3. In view of the same, nothing survives in the present petition. The same is, accordingly, disposed of. The pending application is also disposed of as infructuous. NAVIN CHAWLA, J RAVINDER DUDEJA, J M...
Mukesh Kumar vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 30th March, 2026. Uploaded on: 2nd April, 2026. + W.P.(C) 4035/2026 MUKESH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aditya, Mr. Kailash Kr Jha, Mr. Vipin Kumar, Ms. Anjani Kr. Mishra, Ms. Pralika Chakraborty Mr. Fareeduddin & Ms. Srejal Mishra, Advs.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS.....Respondents Through: Ms. Beenashaw N. Soni, SC for MCD with Ms. Ann Joseph, Advs. Ms. Vaishali Gupta, Panel Counsel (Civil) and Mr. Kartik Sharma, Adv. for GNCTD. Mr. P.S Singh CGSC, Ms Shivangi Sharma Advs. for R-3&4.CORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGHJUSTICE MADHU JAINPrathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner- Mukesh Kumarunder Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking issuance of an appropriate writ directing the Respondents to allow the Petitioner to peacefully vend at his designated spot i.e., on the open sp...
Dr Swati Arjun vs Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3988/2026, CM APPL. 19587/2026 & CM APPL.DR SWATI ARJUN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Bharat Singh, Adv.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ripudaman Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. Kushagra Kumar and Mr. Amit Kumar Rana, Advs. for UOI. Ms. Monika Arora, CGSC, Mr. Avneesh Arputham, Mr. Anuj Tyagi, Mr. Vikrant Vasudev, Mr. Ankit Sharma and Ms. Anamika Thakur, Advs. for R-2 and 3. Dr. Vikrant Narayan, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKARHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLAORDER(ORAL)% 30.03.2026C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. This writ petition is inter alia directed against order dated 27February 2026 by which the services of the petitioner were dispensed with.2. Ms. Monika Arora, learned CGSC who appears forRespondents 2 and 3 submits, on instructions, that the terminationorder dated 27 February 2026 is being withdrawn with liberty to takeaction in accordance with law, ...
Pink City Expressway Pvt. Ltd. vs National Highways Authority of India
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 280/2026 & I.A. 8459/2026 PINK CITY EXPRESSWAY PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sidhant Dwibedi & Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advs.versusNATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OFINDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ankur Mittal, Mr. Abhay Gupta, Mr. Ankur Saboo, Mr. Yugantar Chauhar, Ms. Rabaica Jaiswal & Mr. Hrithik Saxena, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 30.03.2026I.A. 8459/20261. This is an application filed for condonation of delay of 20 days in re-filing the petition.2. For the reasons mentioned therein, the application is allowed. Thedelay in re-filing the petition is condoned.O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 280/20263. This petition is filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration &Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of period for concluding the arbitration proceedings.4. Learned counsel for the respondent has no serious objection to theprayer made.5. In view ...
Jatinder Singh Gill@ Jassi vs State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1208/2026 & CRL.M.A. 9372-74/2026 JATINDER SINGH GILL@ JASSI .....Applicant Through: Mr. Varun Deswal, Mr. Siddharth S. Yadav, Mr. Danish Khan, Mr. Ayush Kr. Singh & Mr. Kashish Ahuja, Advocates.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Akhand Pratap Singh, SPP with Ms. Samridhi Dobhal, Mr. Krishna Mohan Chandel, Mr. Hritwik Maurya, Ms. Lisa Pegwal, Mr. Apoorv Paliya & Mr. Utkarsh Singh, Advocates for State. SI Dinesh Kr., Special Cell.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 30.03.20261. By way of the present application, the applicant seeks extension ofinterim bail for a period of one month (extended until 31.03.2026) granted to him by order dated 26.02.2026 in BAIL APPLN. 849/2026 in relation to FIR No. 455/2024 registered at Police Station Special Cell, under Sections 8(c)/21/22/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.2. Further to the order dated 27.03...
Dream Bath Studio Pvt Ltd vs Govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3974/2026 & CM APPL. 19476/2026 DREAM BATH STUDIO PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anil Dagar, Advocate.versusGOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Vaishali Gupta, Panel Counsel, Civil, GNCTD.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAORDER% 30.03.20261. The Petitioner claims to be the purchaser of agricultural landadmeasuring 11 Bigha and 19 Biswas comprised in Khasra No. 43//1/3 (0- 07), 43//2/1 min. (3-07), 43//9 (4-16) and 43//10/1 (3-09), situated in the revenue estate of Village Ladpur, Delhi.2. It is stated that a Sale Deed dated 07th January, 2026 was executed infavour of the Petitioner and presented before Respondent No. 2 (E-Sub Registrar VI-D). However, the said document has not been processed further and remains pending for registration.3. The reason cited for non-processing of the Sale Deed is the absence ofan NOC from Respondent No. 3 on account of pendency of...
Omkar Kamthe vs State( Nct of Delhi )
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1215/2026, CRL.M.A. 9439/2026 OMKAR KAMTHE .....Applicant Through: Mr. Darshan Singh, Mr. Rajat Kapoor & Ms. Kanika Khurana, Advocates.versusSTATE( NCT OF DELHI ) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP for State. SI Sunil, PS Adarsh Nagar.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 30.03.20261. By way of this application under Section 482 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the applicant seeks anticipatory bail in connection with FIR 886/2025, dated 29.12.2025, registered at Police Adarsh Nagar, District North West, Delhi, under Sections 140(3)/351(2)/127(3)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.2. After some arguments, Mr. Darshan Singh, learned counsel for theapplicant, seeks permission to withdraw this application.3. The application is dismissed as withdrawn. The pendingapplication also stands disposed of.4. It is clarified that this Court has not made any obser...
Maharaja College of Pharmacy vs Pharmacy Council of India
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4082/2026 & CM APPL. 20005/2026MAHARAJA COLLEGE OF PHARMACY.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mayank Manish, Mr. Ravi Kant, Mr. Vineet Upadhyay, Mr. Ayush Aanand, Advs.versusPHARMACY COUNCIL OF INDIA.....Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Mr. Divyansh Singh, Advs. Mr. Yatharth, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 30.03.20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia seeking the following prayers :- (a) quash the decision letter dated 30.09.2025 issued by the PCI, whereby it has rejected the Petitioners Application seeking approval to the D. Pharm and B. Pharm courses; and(b) consequently, direct the Respondent, to restore thePetitioners Application and process the same for grant of approval to Petitioner for running the D. Pharm and B. Pharm courses, from the academic session 2026-27, interms of the scheduled fixed by the Honble Supreme Court vide its Order dated...
Anmol & Ors. vs the State Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 1022/2026 & CRL.M.A. 9614/2026 ANMOL & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Saksham Kathuria, Advocate.versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC with Mr. Sangeet Sibou, Mr. Aniket Kumar Singh, Advocates. SI Bhoopendra Singh, PS-Cyber Rohini. Mr. Raj Kumar, Advocate for R-2.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 30.03.20261. The petitioners have filed this petition under Article 226 of theConstitution, seeking quashing of FIR No. 13/2023 dated 29.03.2023, registered under Sections 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, [IPC] at Cyber Police Station Rohini, District Rohini, Delhi, and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom, on the ground of settlement.2. Issue notice. Mr. Rahul Tyagi, learned Additional StandingCounsel (Criminal), accepts notice on behalf of the State. Mr. Raj Kumar, learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No. 2.3. ...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »