Skip to content

Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Mar 30 2026

Mukesh Kumar Pandey vs Union of India and Anr

Court: Delhi Orders

Decided on: Mar-30-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4134/2026, CM APPL. 20155-20157/2026 MUKESH KUMAR PANDEY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manish Pratap Singh, Mr. Ajay Singh, Mr. Himanshu Shukla, Advocates.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Arti Bansal, CGSC for UOI with Ms. Shruti Goel, Advocate along with Ms. Shambhavi Sharma, GP. Mr. Ravinder Agarwal, Mr. Manish Kumar Singh, Mr. Vasu Agarwal, Advocates for R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAORDER% 30.03.20261. This writ petition seeks the following reliefs:a) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing and setting aside the arbitrary and illegal action of the Respondents whereby the Petitioner has been treated as a Non-EWS candidate and denied allocation of service in the Civil Services Examination, 2024, despite his valid EWS certificate and inclusion in the Reserve List dated 28.10.2025.b) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction direct...


Mar 30 2026

Devyani International Limited vs Airports Authority of India

Court: Delhi Orders

Decided on: Mar-30-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 285/2026 & I.A. 8563/2026 DEVYANI INTERNATIONAL LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Jai Allagh, Mr. Abhinav Agarwal, Mr. Pulkit Dahiya & Mr. Aman Sharma, Advs. (through VC)versusAIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Udit Gupta Mr. Vyom Chaturvedi & Ms. Pragya Gupta, Advs. (throughVC)CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 30.03.20261. This petition is filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration &Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of period for concluding the arbitration proceedings.2. Learned counsel for the respondent has no serious objection to theprayer made.3. In view of the above, the time period for conclusion of theproceedings is extended by three months as prayed for.4. This petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.AVNEESH JHINGAN, JMARCH 30, 2026haThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re...


Mar 30 2026

Venus Education Trust& Ors. vs State Through Joint Commissioner of Pol ...

Court: Delhi Orders

Decided on: Mar-30-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2352/2026 VENUS EDUCATION TRUST& ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. V. K. Pandey with Mr. Abhigyan, Mr. Murari Tiwari, Mr. Chaitanya Sharma and Mr. Akash Pandey, Advocates.versusSTATE THROUGH JOINT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE TECH,CYBER AND LICENSING & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Shubhi Gupta, APP for the State with SI Shankar, P.S.: Dwarka South. Mr. Jogender Kumar, Advocate forR-4.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 30.03.2026CRL.M.A. 9544/2026Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed-of.CRL.M.C. 2352/2026By way of the present petition filed under section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 (BNSS), the petitioners inter-alia seek quashing of an acknowledgment registered on the Cyber Portal of the Delhi Police.2. Mr. V. K. Pandey, learned counsel appearing for the petitionerssubmits, that the money that is subject matter of the complaint made...


Mar 30 2026

Indusind Gen Ins Co Ltd vs Baby Sristhi and Orhers

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-30-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of decision: 30th March 2026+ MAC.APP. 220/2026 & CM APPL. 19842-19844/2026 INDUSIND GEN INS CO LTD .....Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Adv.versusBABY SRISTHI AND OTHERS .....Respondent Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYALJUDGMENTANISH DAYAL, J (ORAL)1. This appeal has been filed against impugned award dated 03 rdDecember 2025 passed by Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal [MACT], North-West, Rohini Courts in MACT No.288/2022 whereby Rs. 74,54,467.4/-alongwith interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of filing of detailed accident report (DAR) was awarded.2. The accident in question occurred on 18th September 2021 whenrespondent no.1/injured claimant, who was a minor child aged 2 years on the date of the accident, went with her mother to a nearby Hanuman Mandir and when they were returning home, a vehicle bearing registration no. DL-1ZD-Digitally Signed MAC.APP. 220/2026 1 of 91980 (hereinafter,...


Mar 30 2026

Insp Exe Manoj Kumar Yadav & Ors vs Union of India & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-30-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4123/2026 CM APPL. 20134-20135/2026 INSP EXE MANOJ KUMAR YADAV & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Abhay Kumar Bhargava, Mr. Satyaarth Sinha and Mr. Ajinkya Dhalwade, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAORDER% 30.03.20261. This petition is a second round of litigation, the first being theW.P.(C) 363/2026 titled Insp/Exe Manoj Kumar Yadav & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors., wherein we have in paragraphs 2 to 5 stated as under: 2. In effect, the petitioners are praying for the benefit as has been granted by this Court in the case of Harjinder Singh & Ors. v. Union of India, W.P. (C) 9256/2020 decided on 06.01.2021 wherein, this Court by referring to the judgment of this Court in the case of Brahma Prakash & Ors. v. Union of India, W.P. (C) 3636/2016, has granted pay fixation upon pro...


Mar 30 2026

Galaxie Agritech Pvt Ltd vs Union of India & Ors.

Court: Delhi Orders

Decided on: Mar-30-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4081/2026 & CM APPL. 20004/2026GALAXIE AGRITECH PVT LTD.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Dewan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sidharth Chopra, Mr. Aditya Awasthi, Mr. Anish Dewan, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS......Respondent Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar Rout, SC for R-2/ SIDBIMr. Sumit Sharma, Adv. for R-3CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 30.03.2026CM APPL. 20003/2026Exemption granted, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of.W.P.(C) 4081/20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia seeking the following prayers: 1) Issue a Writ in the nature of mandamus, or any other No.3 to enforce the guidelines issued by the RBI vide notification/circular dated 17.03.2016 bearing number RBI/2015- "Framework for Revival and Rehabilitation of MSMEs". and/or by placing the Petitioner before the Corrective Action Plan Committee.2) Issue a Writ in the nat...


Mar 30 2026

Dr Vikas Shivajirao Mahalkar vs Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limite ...

Court: Delhi Orders

Decided on: Mar-30-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4140/2026 & CM APPLs. 20232-20233/2026 DR VIKAS SHIVAJIRAO MAHALKAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankur Khandelwal, Mr. Chirag Sharma, Mr. Nikhil Saurabh and Ms. Phallya Jain, Advocates.versusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LIMITED & ORS......Respondents Through: Mr. Abhishek Puri, Mr. Sahil Grewal and Ms. Surbhi Gupta, Advocates forR-1.Mr. T. Singhdev, Mr. Abhijit Chakravarty, Mr. Tanishq Srivastav, Ms. Yamini Singh, Mr. Vedant Sood and Ms. Ramanpreet Kaur, Advocates for R-3. Mr. Sriharsha Peechara, SC forNBEMS.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAORDER% 30.03.20261. At the request of counsel for the Petitioner, National Board ofExamination Medical Science is impleaded as Respondent No. 5. Amended memo of parties be filed within a period of one week from today.2. The Petitioner is a medical officer employed with Respondent No. 1since 23rd November, 2015. It is asserted that he has rendered continuo...


Mar 30 2026

Balwan Khokhar vs State of Nct of Delhi

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-30-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 1018/2026 BALWAN KHOKHAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Vignaraj Pasayat, DHCLSC, with Mr.Naman Aggarwal and Mr.Eishan, AdvocatesversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr.Rahul Tyagi, ASC with Inspector Sandeep PS Delhi Cantt.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 30.03.20261. The petitioner was convicted for offences under Section 302 of theIndian Penal Code, 1860, alongwith other offences, by a judgment of the learned Sessions Court dated 30.04.2013, followed by an order on sentence dated 09.05.2013, whereby he was sentenced to life imprisonment. His appeal, being Criminal Appeal No. 861/2013, was dismissed by this Court vide judgment dated 17.12.2018 upholding thejudgment of conviction and order on sentence. The appeal before theSupreme Court, being Criminal Appeal Nos. 16651666/2019, is stated to be pending.2. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking release on the secondspell of furlo...


Mar 30 2026

Avaada Energy Private Limited vs Central Transmission Utility of India ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-30-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4088/2026 with CM APPL. 20024/2026 AVAADA ENERGY PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Mr. Nived Veerapaneni, Ms. Shubham Mudgil, Mr. Jagdish Agarwal, Mr. Ravi Verma, Mr. Ashish Anand, Mr. Abhinav Kapoor and Ms. Radhika Yadav, Advocates.versusCENTRAL TRANSMISSION UTILITY OF INDIA LIMITED &ANR. .....Respondents Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 30.03.20261. The present writ petition has been filed seeking stay of the impugnednotice dated 3rd March, 2026, passed by the respondent no.1/ Central Transmission Utility of India Ltd. (CTUIL) and maintaining of status quo till the respondent no.2/ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC) decides the interim relief application filed by the petitioner against the impugned notice.2. The petitioner is setting up a 50 MW wind power project at DevbhumiDwarka, Gujarat. A Power Pu...


Mar 30 2026

Vashudev and Ors vs the State of Nct of Delhi and Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-30-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2353/2026, CRL.M.A. 9545/2026 VASHUDEV AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr.Kamal Kumar, AdvocateversusTHE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondent Through: Mr.Hitesh Vali, APP for State with ASI Raj Kishor, PS GTB Enclave and SI Nagendra Singh Ms.Meenu Sharma, Advocate forR-2CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 30.03.2026 CRL.M.A. No. 9545/2026 (for exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. No. 2353/20261. The petitioners have filed this petition under Section 528 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS] (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC]) seeking quashing of FIR No. 1378/2021 dated 06.11.2021, registered at Police Station Mahendra Park, under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [IPC], and all proceedings emanating therefrom, on the ground of settlement.CRL.M.C. 2353/2026 ...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial