Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Swamy Nathan Ramalingam vs Ckers Finance Pvt. Ltd
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2294/2026 & CRL.M.A. 9363/2026, CRL.M.A.SWAMY NATHAN RAMALINGAM .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Atul Kumar, AdvocateversusCKERS FINANCE PVT. LTD .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 27.03.2026 CRL.M.A. 9364/2026 (exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 2294/2026 and CRL.M.A. 9363/2026 (stay)1. By way of the present petition, the petitioner seeks quashing ofComplaint Case No. CC NI Act 1753/2023, instituted by the respondent under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [NI Act].2. The petitioner was a Director of a company named M/s. GreensolRenewable Power Pvt. Ltd. [the Company], which has been arrayed as Accused No. 1 in the aforesaid complaint case. The petitioner has been arrayed as Accused No. 4.3. The complaint case is based upon the alleged dishonour of chequebearing No. 143795 dated 13...
Sh Kapil Kashyap vs Central Bank of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3961/2026&CM APPL. 19338/2026 SH KAPIL KASHYAP .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Naginder Benipal, Mr. Udit Vaghela, Mr. Jaskaran Singh, Mr. Arjun Baliyan, Advs.versusCENTRAL BANK OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar Rout, SC forR-1Mr. Brijesh Yadav, SPC with Mr. Nikita, Mr. Sandeep Yadav, Mr. Anirudh Nagar, Mr. Rahul Yadav, Mr. Kunal Chaudhary, Mr. Amarjeet Singh, Advs. for R-2/UOICORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 27.03.2026CM APPL. 19337/2026Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of.W.P.(C) 3961/20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia seeking the following prayers:- A. Issue a writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction calling for the records and quashing the freeze instructions/liens issued by Respondent No. 3 and executed by Respondent No. 1 inrespect of the Petit...
Mayur Rathour vs Shweta Rathour
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.REV.P.(MAT.) 164/2026 & CRL.M.As. 9257-9258/2026 MAYUR RATHOUR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhinav Sharma, Mr. Ashish Sharma and Mr. Mahender Shukla, Advocates.versusSHWETA RATHOUR .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 27.03.20261. The present petition is directed against the order dated 10.09.2025passed by the learned Family Court, whereby ad interim maintenance of Rs. 40,000/- has been granted in favour of the respondent. I am, however, informed that the application under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is still pending consideration before the learned Family Court.2. Mr. Abhinav Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitsthat the petitioner shall approach the learned Family Court for an expeditious decision on the application for interim maintenance.3. In view of the above submission, the present petition, alongwithpending applications, is disposed ...
Hari Prasad Gupta & Ors. vs State Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
$~88 & 104* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2244/2026 & CRL.M.As. 9193-9194/2026ANOOP GAUR AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Sumit Mishra and Mr. Udath Singh, Advocates with petitionersversusSTATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State with SI Ram Singh PS Govind Puri and SI Raghuraj Singh PS Sangam Vihar Mr. Pawan Gupta and Mr. Anmol Sharma, Advocates for complainant.+ CRL.M.C. 2297/2026 & CRL.M.As. 9368-9369/2026HARI PRASAD GUPTA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Pawan Gupta and Mr. Anmol Sharma, AdvocatesversusSTATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State with SI Ram Singh PS Govind Puri and SI Raghuraj Singh PS Sangam Vihar Mr. Sumit Mishra and Mr. Udath Singh, Advocates for ComplainantCORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANCRL.M.C. 2244/2026 & connected matters Page 1 of 11ORDER% 27.03.2026 CRL.M.A. No. 9194/2026 (for exemption) in CRL.M.C. No. 2244/...
Dt College vs National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3959/2026 & CM APPL. 19314/2026 DT COLLEGE .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sumit Kishore, Ms. Jyoti Jyotsana, Advs.versusNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR......Respondents Through: Mr. Anuj Kapoor, Mr. Nandeesh Nanda, Mr. Shivom Sethi, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 27.03.20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia seeking the following prayers:- (a) Pass an appropriate order, direction or writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ quashing the impugned withdrawal order File No. NCTE/2025/ NRC/ PAR/ ORDER/NRCAPP-5051 dated 29.05.2025 issued by the respondent No.2/NRC, NCTE in the interest of justice and in the facts and circumstances of the present case; and(b) Pass an appropriate order, direction or writ in thenature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ directing the Respondent No. 2 to restore the Recognitionorder d...
Aveena Milk Products vs Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3830/2026 & CM APPL. 18708/2026 Date of Decision: 27.03.2026 AVEENA MILK PRODUCTS .....Petitioner Through: Mr Arun Batta, Mr Abdul Vahid Advocates.versusUNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, SPCCORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVJUDGEMENTPURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J. (ORAL)1. The petition is for setting aside the communication dated 04.12.2025issued by the respondent, whereby, the petitioner has been informed that its case for release of third installment of grant-in-aid under the Integrated Cold Chain Project Scheme (Scheme) has been treated as closed.2. As per the case set up by the petitioner, in the year 2015, it had beensanctioned financial assistance of Rs. 10,00,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Crore only) by the respondent under the Scheme for setting up an integrated cold- chain project in the State of Uttarakhand. However, on 08.11.2019, the respondent issued communication declining ...
M/S Shanti Refrigeration Ind. Pvt.Ltd. vs M/S Rajasthan Metals & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2288/2026M/S SHANTI REFRIGERATION IND. PVT.LTD......Petitioner Through: Mr. Lalit Kumar and Ms. Manisha Ranjan, Advocates.versusM/S RAJASTHAN METALS & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Sougata Ganguly, Mr. Deepak K Bansal, Mr. Rukban Tyagi and Ms. Yogita Bansal, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 27.03.2026 CRL.M.A. 9335/2026 (exemption) Exemption granted, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CRL.M.A. 9336/2026 (condonation of 04 days delay in re-filing) For the reasons stated in the application, which is duly supported by affidavit, the delay is condoned.2. The application is allowed and disposed-of.CRL.M.C. 2288/2026 & CRL.M.A. 9334/2026 (stay)3. By way of the present petition filed under section 528 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioner impugns the proceedings in Criminal Complaint bearing No. 16395/2019 filed under secti...
Prof Quddus Khan vs Jamia Millia Islamia University & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ Date of Decision: 27.03.2026% LPA 162/2026 & CM APPL. 19169/2026PROF QUDDUS KHAN .....Appellant Through: Mr. K.K. Tyagi, Adv. with Mr.Iftekhar Ahmad & Ms. Garima Tyagi, Advs.versusJAMIA MILLIA ISLAMIA UNIVERSITY & ANR......Respondents Through: Mr. Pritish Sabharwal, Adv. with Ms.Shweta Singh & Mr. Sanjeet Kumar, Advs. for JMI.CORAM:HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIADEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ. (ORAL)CM APPL. 19170/2026 (for exemption)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The application stands disposed of.LPA 162/2026 & CM APPL. 19169/2026 (for stay)3. This intra-court appeal challenges the order dated 04.02.2026 passedby learned Single Judge, whereby W.P.(C) 1278/2026 instituted by the appellant, has been dismissed.Signature Not Verified LPA 162/2026 Page 1 of 94. The underlying writ petition was filed by the appellant with theprayer to quash the order ...
Sistla Vamsi Krishna vs Wapcos Limited
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3970/2026 & CM APPLs. 19439/2026, 19440/2026, SISTLA VAMSI KRISHNA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nachiketa Vajpayee, Advocate.versusWAPCOS LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, SC with Mr. Mohit Bhardwaj and Mr. Pulak Gupta Joshi, Advocates with Mr. Rajat Jain, AR of WAPCOS.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAORDER% 27.03.20261. The Petitioner seeks to place the matter on a larger plane by urgingthat the writ petition raises an important question as to whether an instrumentality of the State can effect the transfer of a sole caregiver of a person with benchmark disability and high support needs, without disclosing any compelling administrative necessity, and in the process defeat the protection said to arise under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016.1 Reliance is also placed on the Office Memorandum dated 2 nd February, 2024 issued by the Department of Personnel and Training, which ...
Nec Corporation India Private Limited vs Directorate of Health Service
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 277/2026 NEC CORPORATION INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Pallavi Kumar, Adv.versusDIRECTORATE OF HEALTH SERVICE .....Respondent Through: Appearance not given.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 27.03.20261. This petition is filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration &Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of period for concluding the arbitration proceedings.2. Learned counsel for the respondent has no serious objection to theprayer made.3. In view of the above, the time period for conclusion of theproceedings is extended by six months.4. This petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.AVNEESH JHINGAN, JMARCH 27, 2026/PaThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/03/2026 at 17:32:25...
- ‹ Prev
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- Next ›
- Last »